A Moth to a Flame? Fulfilling Connectedness Needs Through Romantic Relationships Protects Conspiracy Theorists Against COVID-19 Misinformation

[1]  S. Murray,et al.  Pursuing safety in social connection regulates the risk-regulation, social-safety, and behavioral-immune systems. , 2023, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  F. Righetti,et al.  Factors that contribute to the maintenance or decline of relationship satisfaction , 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology.

[3]  L. Robertson.  Association of COVID-19 mortality with politics and on-demand testing in 217 U.S. counties , 2021, BMC Public Health.

[4]  D. Oyserman,et al.  Seeing meaning even when none may exist: Collectivism increases belief in empty claims. , 2021, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Conspiracy beliefs and the individual, relational, and collective selves , 2021, Social and Personality Psychology Compass.

[6]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  Pro‐vaccination subjective norms moderate the relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions , 2021, British journal of health psychology.

[7]  D. Griffin,et al.  Looking for Safety in All the Right Places: When Threatening Political Reality Strengthens Family Relationship Bonds , 2021, Social Psychological and Personality Science.

[8]  C. Kaltwasser,et al.  Populist attitudes and conspiratorial thinking , 2021, Party Politics.

[9]  G. Echterhoff,et al.  Shared Reality: From Sharing-Is-Believing to Merging Minds , 2021, Current Directions in Psychological Science.

[10]  J. Jost,et al.  The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking , 2021 .

[11]  S. Gosling,et al.  Small Effects: The Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science , 2021, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[12]  Balázs Kovács,et al.  Social Networks and Loneliness During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World.

[13]  M. Hornsey.  Why Facts Are Not Enough: Understanding and Managing the Motivated Rejection of Science , 2020 .

[14]  Debbie S. Ma,et al.  Chicago Face Database: Multiracial expansion , 2020, Behavior research methods.

[15]  S. Phadke,et al.  What Makes People Join Conspiracy Communities? , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  W. Hofmann,et al.  Do people realize how their partners make them feel? Relationship enhancement motives and stress determine the link between implicitly assessed partner attitudes and relationship satisfaction. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Martin Bruder,et al.  The conspiracy hoax? Testing key hypotheses about the correlates of generic beliefs in conspiracy theories during the COVID‐19 pandemic , 2020, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[18]  N. Bolger,et al.  Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Igor Mikloušić,et al.  Beliefs in COVID-19 conspiracy theories predict lower level of compliance with the preventive measures both directly and indirectly by lowering trust in government medical officials , 2020 .

[20]  P. Newcomb,et al.  Effect of social distancing on COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the US , 2020, medRxiv.

[21]  S. Delouvée,et al.  Conspiracy Beliefs, Rejection of Vaccination, and Support for hydroxychloroquine: A Conceptual Replication-Extension in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[22]  D. Griffin,et al.  The social-safety system: Fortifying relationships in the face of the unforeseeable. , 2020, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Yan Bai,et al.  Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. , 2020, JAMA.

[24]  Zhansheng Chen,et al.  Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Following Ostracism , 2020, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[25]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Creating the sacred from the profane: Collective effervescence and everyday activities , 2020, The Journal of Positive Psychology.

[26]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Understanding Conspiracy Theories , 2019, Political Psychology.

[27]  T. Joiner,et al.  Implicit interpersonal evaluations as a risk factor for suicidality: Automatic spousal attitudes predict changes in the probability of suicidal thoughts. , 2019, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  S. Murray,et al.  Romantic relationships as shared reality defense. , 2018, Current opinion in psychology.

[29]  Geoffrey Wetherell,et al.  Social devaluation of African Americans and race-related conspiracy theories , 2018, European Journal of Social Psychology.

[30]  W. Hofmann,et al.  Speech Is Silver, Nonverbal Behavior Is Gold: How Implicit Partner Evaluations Affect Dyadic Interactions in Close Relationships , 2018, Psychological science.

[31]  Taylor W. Brown,et al.  Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain , 2018, European journal of social psychology.

[33]  O. Klein,et al.  Stigmatized beliefs: Conspiracy theories, anticipated negative evaluation of the self, and fear of social exclusion , 2018, European Journal of Social Psychology.

[34]  James K. McNulty,et al.  A Dual-Process Perspective on How Sexual Experiences Shape Automatic Versus Explicit Relationship Satisfaction: Reply to Brody, Costa, Klapilová, and Weiss (2018) , 2018, Psychological science.

[35]  L. Littvay,et al.  The Elite Is Up to Something: Exploring the Relation Between Populism and Belief in Conspiracy Theories , 2017 .

[36]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories , 2017, Current directions in psychological science.

[37]  Rachael E. Jones,et al.  Automatic Associations Between One’s Partner and One’s Affect as the Proximal Mechanism of Change in Relationship Satisfaction: Evidence From Evaluative Conditioning , 2017, Psychological science.

[38]  Damaris Graeupner,et al.  The dark side of meaning-making: How social exclusion leads to superstitious thinking , 2017 .

[39]  R. Slatcher,et al.  A Social Psychological Perspective on the Links Between Close Relationships and Health , 2017, Current directions in psychological science.

[40]  Andrea L Meltzer,et al.  Capturing the Interpersonal Implications of Evolved Preferences? Frequency of Sex Shapes Automatic, but Not Explicit, Partner Evaluations , 2016, Psychological science.

[41]  James R. Davis,et al.  Seeing red: How perceptions of social status and worth influence hostile attributions and endorsement of aggression. , 2015, The British journal of social psychology.

[42]  Amanda L. Forest,et al.  Turbulent Times, Rocky Relationships , 2015, Psychological science.

[43]  D. Bates,et al.  Parsimonious Mixed Models , 2015, 1506.04967.

[44]  Zhansheng Chen,et al.  Cold Thermal Temperature Threatens Belonging , 2015 .

[45]  Vivian Zayas,et al.  Social Psychological and Personality Science Love You? Hate You? Maybe It's Both: Evidence That Significant Others Trigger Bivalent-priming on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology Association for Research in Personality European Association of Social Psychology Society of Experim , 2022 .

[46]  E. Finkel,et al.  The Suffocation of Marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow Without Enough Oxygen , 2014 .

[47]  Andrea L Meltzer,et al.  Though They May Be Unaware, Newlyweds Implicitly Know Whether Their Marriage Will Be Satisfying , 2013, Science.

[48]  Christopher C. French,et al.  Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[49]  Debra Mashek,et al.  The Self-Expansion Model of Motivation and Cognition in Close Relationships , 2013 .

[50]  J. Simpson,et al.  The Oxford handbook of close relationships , 2013 .

[51]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[52]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  The dynamics of relationship promotion: controlling the automatic inclination to trust. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  N. Bolger,et al.  Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research , 2013 .

[54]  Jon K. Maner,et al.  Warmth, spatial proximity, and social attachment: The embodied perception of a social metaphor , 2012 .

[55]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  A Smart Unconscious? Procedural Origins of Automatic Partner Attitudes in Marriage. , 2010, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[58]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[59]  Etienne P LeBel,et al.  Implicit partner affect, relationship satisfaction, and the prediction of romantic breakup. , 2009 .

[60]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Advancing formative measurement models , 2008 .

[61]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  More than words: reframing compliments from romantic partners fosters security in low self-esteem individuals. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Optimizing assurance: the risk regulation system in relationships. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[63]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[64]  W. Wood,et al.  Social Influence in Attitudes and Attitude Change. , 2005 .

[65]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[66]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[67]  K. Williams,et al.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[68]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[69]  Jennifer Crocker,et al.  Belief in U.S. Government Conspiracies Against Blacks among Black and White College Students: Powerlessness or System Blame? , 1999 .

[70]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- Tin Chen, Bargh / Consequences of Automatic Evaluation Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus , 2022 .

[71]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[72]  Ted Goertzel,et al.  Belief in Conspiracy Theories , 1994 .

[73]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[74]  S. Epstein,et al.  A procedural note on the measurement of broad dispositions. , 1984, Journal of personality.

[75]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[76]  M. Leary,et al.  The relentless pursuit of acceptance and belonging , 2022, Advances in Motivation Science.

[77]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Social Surrogates, Social Motivations, and Everyday Activities: The Case for a Strong, Subtle, and Sneaky Social Self , 2016 .

[78]  William J. Browne,et al.  A User's Guide To Mlwin , 2015 .

[79]  M. Perugini,et al.  Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  L. Ross,et al.  Subjective Construal, Social Inference, and Human Misunderstanding , 1991 .