Big Data Characterization of Learner Behaviour in a Highly Technical MOOC Engineering Course

MOOCs attract a large number of users with unknown diversity in terms of motivation, ability, and goals. To understand more about learners in a MOOC, the authors explored clusters of user clickstream patterns in a highly technical MOOC, Nanophotonic Modelling through the algorithm k-means++.  Five clusters of user behaviour emerged: Fully Engaged, Consistent Viewers, One-Week Engaged, Two-Week Engaged, and Sporadic users. Assessment behaviours and scores are then examined within each cluster, and found different between clusters. Nonparametric statistical test, Kruskal-Wallis yielded a significant difference between user behaviour in each cluster. To make accurate inferences about what occurs in a MOOC, a first step is to understand the patterns of user behaviour. The latent characteristics that contribute to user behaviour must be explored in future research.  Keywords: MOOCs, Learning Analytics, Assessment

[1]  Vincent Tinto Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research , 1975 .

[2]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .

[3]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  Student skill and goal achievement in the mapping with google MOOC , 2014, L@S.

[4]  Andrew D. Ho,et al.  Changing “Course” , 2014 .

[5]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  MOOCs From the Viewpoint of the Learner , 2015 .

[6]  F KizilcecRené,et al.  Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners , 2015 .

[7]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.

[8]  Anil K. Jain Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[9]  Katy Jordan,et al.  Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses , 2014 .

[10]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Finding reproducible cluster partitions for the k-means algorithm , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  Joseph Jay Williams,et al.  HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012-Summer 2014 , 2015 .

[12]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years , 2011 .

[13]  Patrick Parslow,et al.  Dropout: MOOC participants’perspective , 2014 .

[14]  Robert F. Boruch,et al.  Moving Through MOOCs , 2014 .

[15]  Justin Reich,et al.  Rebooting MOOC Research , 2015, Science.

[16]  Gayle S. Christensen,et al.  The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? , 2013 .

[17]  Chris Piech,et al.  Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses , 2013, LAK '13.

[18]  Henry Stark,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Random Processes for Engineers , 2011 .

[19]  Heinz Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  Combining social network analysis with semantic relations to support the evolution of a scientific community , 2007, CSCL.

[20]  Justin Reich,et al.  Heroesx: The Ancient Greek Hero: Spring 2013 Course Report , 2014 .

[21]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[22]  Krishna Madhavan,et al.  Learners in Advanced Nanotechnology MOOCs: Understanding their Intention and Motivation , 2016 .

[23]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[24]  Li Yuan,et al.  MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education , 2013 .

[25]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Mining and Visualizing Visited Trails in Web-Based Educational Systems , 2008, EDM.

[26]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Oxytocin increases trust in humans , 2005, Nature.