Wind Tunnel Testing of the NASA-DFRC Flutterometer using a Two DOF Wing Section

Flutter of an aeroelastic structure is potentially destructive aeroelastic instability. This phenomenon has motivated research within the aeroelastic community to develop methods that can accurately predict aeroelastic instabilities. The Flutterometer method used herein, and as developed by NASA DFRC, is based upon the mu method which has been coupled with wavelet filtering processes in estimating aeroelastic models from flight data. The approach leads to a methodology to predict the occurrence of flutter boundaries, and may prove to reliably predict flutter boundaries during flight tests. An analytical model is used as the first estimate of the aeroelastic structural dynamics, and uncertainty operators are introduced into the system to model variations between the theoretical system and the physical system. The modelling uncertainties are then updated from experimental data. Although the model used did not work well with this particular experiment, a sensitivity analysis was additionally performed and improvements suggested.

[1]  Yuji Matsuzaki,et al.  Estimation of flutter boundary from random responses due to turbulence at subcritical speeds , 1981 .

[2]  Andrew J. Kurdila,et al.  Nonlinear Control of a Prototypical Wing Section with Torsional Nonlinearity , 1997 .

[3]  Andrew J. Kurdila,et al.  Identification and Control of Limit Cycle Oscillations in Aeroelastic Systems , 1999 .

[4]  T. Theodorsen.  General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[5]  Marty Brenner,et al.  Incorporating Flight Data into a Robust Aeroelastic Model , 1998 .

[6]  Y. Matsuzaki,et al.  Divergence boundary prediction from random responses - NAL's method , 1984 .

[7]  Richard J. Prazenica,et al.  Multiresolution Methods for Reduced-Order Models for Dynamical Systems , 2001 .

[8]  Marty Brenner,et al.  Robust aeroservoelastic stability analysis , 1999 .

[9]  Theodore Theodorsen,et al.  Mechanism of flutter: A theoretical and experimental investigation of the flutter problem , 1938 .

[10]  Marty Brenner,et al.  Robust Flutter Margins of an F/A-18 Aircraft from Aeroelastic Flight Data , 1997 .

[11]  A. Kurdila,et al.  Adaptive Feedback Linearization for the Control of a Typical Wing Section with Structural Nonlinearity , 1997, 4th International Symposium on Fluid-Structure Interactions, Aeroelasticity, Flow-Induced Vibration and Noise: Volume III.

[12]  Robert V. Doggett,et al.  Evaluation of four subcritical response methods for on-line prediction of flutter onset in wind-tunnel tests , 1982 .

[13]  Jeffrey S. Vipperman,et al.  Comparison of π- and H 2 -Synthesis Controllers on an Experimental Typical Section , 1999 .

[14]  Heather Gilliatt,et al.  Active control of an aeroelastic structure , 1997 .

[15]  Marty Brenner,et al.  Flutterometer: An On-Line Tool to Predict Robust Flutter Margins , 2000 .

[16]  Marty Brenner,et al.  Wavelet Filtering to Reduce Conservatism in Aeroservoelastic Robust Stability Margins , 1998 .

[17]  N. H. Zimmerman,et al.  Prediction of flutter onset speed based on flight testing at subcritical speeds , 1963 .

[18]  K. Kadrnka.  Multimode instability prediction method , 1985 .

[19]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[20]  Yuan-Cheng Fung,et al.  An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity , 1955 .

[21]  S. Price,et al.  Development and analysis of flight flutter prediction methods , 1992 .

[22]  Michael W. Kehoe,et al.  A historical overview of flight flutter testing , 1995 .

[23]  S. J. Price,et al.  Evaluation and Extension of the Flutter-Margin Method for Flight Flutter Prediction , 1993 .

[24]  Rick Lind,et al.  A Worst-Case Approach for On-Line Flutter Prediction , 1998 .