Big Health Data and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Challenge for Research, an Opportunity for Clinical Care

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for the majority of death and hospitalization, health care expenditures and loss of productivity in developed country. CVD research, thus, plays a key role for improving patients' outcomes as well as for the sustainability of health systems. The increasing costs and complexity of modern medicine along with the fragmentation in healthcare organizations interfere with improving quality care and represent a missed opportunity for research. The advancement in diagnosis, therapy and prognostic evaluation of patients with CVD, indeed, is frustrated by limited data access to selected small patient populations, not standardized nor computable definition of disease and lack of approved relevant patient-centered outcomes. These critical issues results in a deep mismatch between randomized controlled trials and real-world setting, heterogeneity in treatment response and wide inter-individual variation in prognosis. Big data approach combines millions of people's electronic health records (EHR) from different resources and provides a new methodology expanding data collection in three direction: high volume, wide variety and extreme acquisition speed. Large population studies based on EHR holds much promise due to low costs, diminished study participant burden, and reduced selection bias, thus offering an alternative to traditional ascertainment through biomedical screening and tracing processes. By merging and harmonizing large data sets, the researchers aspire to build algorithms that allow targeted and personalized CVD treatments. In current paper, we provide a critical review of big health data for cardiovascular research, focusing on the opportunities of this largely free data analytics and the challenges in its realization.

[1]  K. Felekkis,et al.  Challenges in Using Circulating Micro-RNAs as Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Diseases , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[2]  F. Piscione,et al.  Predictors of outcome in heart failure patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation undergoing MitraClip treatment. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[3]  Ki-Hyun Jeon,et al.  Deep learning for predicting in‐hospital mortality among heart disease patients based on echocardiography , 2018, Echocardiography.

[4]  G. Musumeci,et al.  Safety and feasibility of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in non‐TAVI centers: The “BAV for life” experience , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  J. Thor,et al.  Quality indicators and their regular use in clinical practice: results from a survey among users of two cardiovascular National Registries in Sweden , 2018, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[6]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Association of dairy intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study , 2018, The Lancet.

[7]  F. Piscione,et al.  Transcatheter Repair of Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure Patients - A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies on MitraClip Implantation. , 2018, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[8]  C. Held,et al.  Relations between implementation of new treatments and improved outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years: experiences from SWEDEHEART registry 1995 to 2014 , 2018, European heart journal.

[9]  Ewout W. Steyerberg,et al.  Big Data and Predictive Analytics: Recalibrating Expectations , 2018, JAMA.

[10]  G. De Luca,et al.  Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2018, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  S. de Servi,et al.  High on-treatment platelet reactivity and outcome in elderly with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome - Insight from the GEPRESS study. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[12]  Harry Hemingway,et al.  Machine learning models in electronic health records can outperform conventional survival models for predicting patient mortality in coronary artery disease , 2018, bioRxiv.

[13]  Kipp W. Johnson,et al.  Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet? , 2018, Heart.

[14]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[15]  Spiros C. Denaxas,et al.  Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential , 2017, European heart journal.

[16]  E. Omerovic,et al.  Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold: data from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  F. Piscione,et al.  Global longitudinal strain predicts outcome after MitraClip implantation for secondary mitral regurgitation , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[18]  C. Held,et al.  Improved outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years are related to implementation of evidence-based treatments: experiences from the SWEDEHEART registry 1995–2014 , 2017, European heart journal.

[19]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[20]  C. Lee,et al.  Medical big data: promise and challenges , 2017, Kidney research and clinical practice.

[21]  A. de Laat,et al.  Network meta-analysis. , 2017, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[22]  Rachel L. Goldfeder,et al.  Feasibility of Obtaining Measures of Lifestyle From a Smartphone App: The MyHeart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[23]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  Kenney Ng,et al.  Early Detection of Heart Failure Using Electronic Health Records: Practical Implications for Time Before Diagnosis, Data Diversity, Data Quantity, and Data Density , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[25]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  The tip of the iceberg: challenges of accessing hospital electronic health record data for biological data mining , 2016, BioData Mining.

[26]  D. Madigan,et al.  Robust empirical calibration of p‐values using observational data , 2016, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  H. Thiele,et al.  1-Year Outcomes With Intracoronary Abciximab in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Ming Tang,et al.  Predictive Big Data Analytics: A Study of Parkinson’s Disease Using Large, Complex, Heterogeneous, Incongruent, Multi-Source and Incomplete Observations , 2016, PloS one.

[29]  J. Dudley,et al.  Cognitive Machine-Learning Algorithm for Cardiac ImagingCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2016 .

[30]  J. Dudley,et al.  Cognitive Machine-Learning Algorithm for Cardiac Imaging: A Pilot Study for Differentiating Constrictive Pericarditis From Restrictive Cardiomyopathy. , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[31]  I. Sim Two Ways of Knowing: Big Data and Evidence-Based Medicine , 2016, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  Natasa Przulj,et al.  Integrative methods for analyzing big data in precision medicine , 2016, Proteomics.

[33]  Fred Kusumoto,et al.  The application of Big Data in medicine: current implications and future directions , 2016, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[34]  V. Fuster,et al.  Global burden of CVD: focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[35]  R. Nuzzo How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop , 2015, Nature.

[36]  Spiros C. Denaxas,et al.  Big biomedical data and cardiovascular disease research: opportunities and challenges. , 2015, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[37]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[38]  J. Piccini,et al.  The Relationship Between Level of Adherence to Automatic Wireless Remote Monitoring and Survival in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Patients. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  S. de Servi,et al.  Effect of an invasive strategy on outcome in patients ≥75 years of age with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[40]  F. Piscione,et al.  Early stent thrombosis with bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention , 2015, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[41]  M. Biddle,et al.  A report from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. , 2015, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[42]  A. Grey,et al.  Results of Observational Studies: Analysis of Findings from the Nurses’ Health Study , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  I. Kohane,et al.  Finding the missing link for big biomedical data. , 2014, JAMA.

[44]  Harry Hemingway,et al.  Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people , 2014, The Lancet.

[45]  P. Heuschmann,et al.  Supplementary Appendix , 2015 .

[46]  Daniel Levy,et al.  The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective , 2014, The Lancet.

[47]  E. Krishnan,et al.  Big Data and Clinicians: A Review on the State of the Science , 2014, JMIR medical informatics.

[48]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  Cardiovascular Events Associated With Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapies: A Network Meta-Analysis , 2014, Circulation.

[49]  Spiros Denaxas,et al.  Prognostic models for stable coronary artery disease based on electronic health record cohort of 102 023 patients , 2013, European heart journal.

[50]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Quarterly vs. yearly clinical follow-up of remotely monitored recipients of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the REFORM trial , 2013, European heart journal.

[51]  T. Lash,et al.  Determinants and patterns of utilization of primary percutaneous coronary intervention across 12 European countries: 2003-2008. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[52]  F. Piscione,et al.  Polymorphisms of the antiapoptotic protein bag3 may play a role in the pathogenesis of tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[53]  J. Ware,et al.  Cardiovascular Safety of Varenicline: Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trials , 2013, American journal of therapeutics.

[54]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[55]  Bernadette A. Thomas,et al.  Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[56]  Bernadette A. Thomas,et al.  Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[57]  Hsin-Chieh Yeh,et al.  Effect of the 2011 vs 2003 duty hour regulation-compliant models on sleep duration, trainee education, and continuity of patient care among internal medicine house staff: a randomized trial. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[58]  R. Sacco,et al.  Our time: a call to save preventable death from cardiovascular disease (heart disease and stroke). , 2012, Global heart.

[59]  Ramon Luengo-Fernandez,et al.  European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017 , 2012 .

[60]  H. Svanström,et al.  Use of varenicline for smoking cessation and risk of serious cardiovascular events: nationwide cohort study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[61]  Mulugeta Gebregziabher,et al.  Fitting parametric random effects models in very large data sets with application to VHA national data , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[62]  David Gamper Challenges and opportunities , 2012 .

[63]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[64]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[65]  E. Omerovic,et al.  Lower risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis with unrestricted use of 'new-generation' drug-eluting stents: a report from the nationwide Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). , 2012, European heart journal.

[66]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[67]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Extracting Diagnoses and Investigation Results from Unstructured Text in Electronic Health Records by Semi-Supervised Machine Learning , 2012, PloS one.

[68]  C. Furberg,et al.  Risk of serious adverse cardiovascular events associated with varenicline: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[69]  Dealing with data. Challenges and opportunities. Introduction. , 2011, Science.

[70]  Weng Kee Wong,et al.  Handling missing data issues in clinical trials for rheumatic diseases. , 2011, Contemporary clinical trials.

[71]  P. Heidenreich,et al.  Long-Term Outcome After ICD and CRT Implantation and Influence of Remote Device Follow-Up: The ALTITUDE Survival Study , 2010, Circulation.

[72]  B. Lagerqvist,et al.  Patent coronary artery and myocardial infarction in the era of primary angioplasty: assessment of an old problem in a new setting with data from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[73]  Bradley Malin,et al.  Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[74]  N. Rigotti,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Varenicline for Smoking Cessation in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Randomized Trial , 2010, Circulation.

[75]  V. Preedy,et al.  Prospective Cohort Study , 2010 .

[76]  Johan Lindbäck,et al.  Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[77]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Large Datasets in Biomedicine: A Discussion of Salient Analytic Issues , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[78]  S. Allender,et al.  European cardiovascular disease statistics , 2008 .

[79]  Johan Lindbäck,et al.  Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[80]  David E Newby,et al.  Acute coronary syndromes in Europe: 1-year costs and outcomes , 2007, Current medical research and opinion.

[81]  A. Alavi,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges , 1998, In Vitro Diagnostic Industry in China.

[82]  Mark Woodward,et al.  Imputations of missing values in practice: results from imputations of serum cholesterol in 28 cohort studies. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[83]  S. Lange,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[84]  Jeremy Fairbank,et al.  Historical Perspective , 1987, Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?.

[85]  M. Aickin,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods. , 1996, American journal of public health.