Challenging perceptual tasks require more attention: The influence of task difficulty on the N1 effect of temporal orienting

Both filter and resource models of attention suggest an influence of task difficulty on the size of early attention effects. As for temporal orienting, the idea that early effects are modulated by task difficulty has not been tested directly, so far. To fill this empirical gap, the present study used an auditory temporal-orienting task, in which two differently pitched pure tones served as targets. To manipulate perceptual difficulty, the pitch difference between the targets was either small or large. Temporal orienting enhanced the N1 component of the auditory event-related potential. This early, sensory effect tended to be larger in the more difficult condition, particularly over the frontal scalp. Notably, increasing task difficulty affected predominantly the processing of attended stimuli. Hence, temporal orienting may operate by increasing processing resources or gain settings for the attended time point - rather than by withdrawing resources from the unattended time point.

[1]  I. Winkler,et al.  Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Kathrin Lange,et al.  The temporal orienting P3 effect to non-target stimuli: Does it reflect motor inhibition? , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[3]  A. Nobre,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  The distribution of attention across auditory input channels: an assessment using the human evoked potential. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[5]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Kathrin Lange,et al.  The N1 effect of temporal attention is independent of sound location and intensity: implications for possible mechanisms of temporal attention. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Orienting Attention to Points in Time Improves Stimulus Processing Both within and across Modalities , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  B. Milliken,et al.  Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  A. Zador,et al.  Auditory cortex mediates the perceptual effects of acoustic temporal expectation , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Nobre,et al.  The hazards of time , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  Geoffrey M. Ghose,et al.  Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing , 2002, Nature.

[14]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Brain events underlying detection and recognition of weak sensory signals. , 1980, Science.

[15]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials , 2006, Brain Research.

[16]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[17]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  A. Nobre,et al.  Nervous anticipation: Top-down biasing across space and time. , 2012 .

[20]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Attending points in time and space , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  S. Hillyard,et al.  The division of attention and the human auditory evoked potential , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  K. Lange,et al.  Effects of temporal trial-by-trial cuing on early and late stages of auditory processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Anna C. Nobre,et al.  How can temporal expectations bias perception and action , 2010 .

[25]  S Zerlin,et al.  Acoustic relations of the human vertex potential. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Effects of information processing demands on slow negative shift latencies and N100 amplitude in selective and divided attention , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[27]  Pío Tudela,et al.  The attentional mechanism of temporal orienting: determinants and attributes , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Anna C. Nobre,et al.  Synergistic Effect of Combined Temporal and Spatial Expectations on Visual Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  M K Kaiser,et al.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Encoding of Temporal Probabilities in the Human Brain , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  C. C. Wood,et al.  The ɛ-Adjustment Procedure for Repeated-Measures Analyses of Variance , 1976 .

[32]  T. Okita,et al.  Within-channel selection and event-related potentials during selective auditory attention. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[33]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Neural dynamics of attending and ignoring in human auditory cortex , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Anna C Nobre,et al.  Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Claude Alain,et al.  Effects of Attentional Load on Auditory Scene Analysis , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: Event-related potential evidence , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  K. Lange Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  H. Davis,et al.  Relations of the human vertex potential to acoustic input: loudness and masking. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Britt Anderson,et al.  Effects of temporal context and temporal expectancy on neural activity in inferior temporal cortex , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. Effects of signal intensity and masking noise. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Auditory evoked potentials and divided attention. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[43]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: Relation to decision criteria , 1973 .

[44]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Detection and recognition: Concurrent processes in perception , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: an event-related potential study. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[46]  A. Nobre,et al.  Temporal Expectation Improves the Quality of Sensory Information , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.

[48]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  C. Kreitz,et al.  Independent effects of temporal expectation and stimulus intensity in audition , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[50]  M. Shadlen,et al.  A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  H. Pratt,et al.  Correlations between psychophysical magnitude estimates and simultaneously obtained auditory nerve, brain stem and cortical responses to click stimuli in man. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[52]  K. Lange The ups and downs of temporal orienting: a review of auditory temporal orienting studies and a model associating the heterogeneous findings on the auditory N1 with opposite effects of attention and prediction , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[53]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  R A Butler,et al.  The auditory evoked response to stimuli producing periodicity pitch. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[55]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.