Measuring accessibility and utilization of public spaces in Famagusta

Abstract Public spaces have a central role, both physically and functionally, in urban planning and development. Many urban theorists state their significant role as one of the principal components of a healthy urban setting. This is in addition to their functional role, when they increase a sense of community when intensive social interaction takes place in these areas. However, recently, they have started to lose significance, when they are neglected in the urban planning process, or when existing spaces are lost. Additionally, accessibility and utilization of these areas decreases, since public spaces are neglected in urban planning and development processes. In this study, public spaces are assessed in terms of accessibility and utilization, regarding the effects of rapid urban growth on their physical and functional structure. This study first evaluates the significance of public spaces in an urban setting; second, determines the variables effective in terms of their accessibility and utilization; third, assesses the factors affecting the accessibility and utilization of public spaces through a questionnaire survey on the role of public spaces in social interaction, and concludes with an evaluation of the results and suggestions for further research.

[1]  L. Bertolini.  Spatial Development Patterns and Public Transport: The Application of an Analytical Model in the Netherlands , 1999 .

[2]  Henri Lefebvre,et al.  The production of space , 1992 .

[3]  A. Helling,et al.  Changing intra-metropolitan accessibility in the U.S.: Evidence from Atlanta , 1998 .

[4]  I Goodman.William,et al.  Principles and practice of urban planning , 1968 .

[5]  Francis Tibbalds,et al.  Making People-Friendly Towns : Improving the Public Environment in Towns and Cities , 2001 .

[6]  A. Duany.  Towns and town-making principles , 1991 .

[7]  Teresa Caldeira,et al.  Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space , 1994 .

[8]  Catherine C. H. Chiu,et al.  Accessibility of low-income workers in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[9]  Ken Worpole.  Towns for People: Transforming Urban Life , 1992 .

[10]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Mobility Environments and Network Cities , 2003 .

[11]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  A Catholic Approach to Organizing What Urban Designers Should Know , 1992 .

[12]  Emily Talen,et al.  Measuring the public realm: A preliminary assessment of the link between public space and sense of community , 2000 .

[13]  Bryan H. Massam,et al.  Location and space in social administration , 1975 .

[14]  H. C. Miller,et al.  Cities Back from the Edge: New Life for Downtown , 1998 .

[15]  F. Erkip,et al.  The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks and recreational services in Ankara , 1997 .

[16]  D. Levinson.  Accessibility and the Journey to Work , 1998 .

[17]  P. Harnik.  The excellent city park system - what makes it great and how to get there. , 2003 .

[18]  Harvey S. Perloff.  The art of planning , 1985 .

[19]  Ali Madanipour,et al.  Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a Socio-Spatial Process , 1996 .

[20]  Philip Langdon,et al.  A Better Place to Live: Reshaping the American Suburb , 1994 .