Leaf Movements of Indoor Plants Monitored by Terrestrial LiDAR

Plant leaf movement is induced by some combination of different external and internal stimuli. Detailed geometric characterization of such movement is expected to improve understanding of these mechanisms. A metric high-quality, non-invasive and innovative sensor system to analyze plant movement is Terrestrial LiDAR (TLiDAR). This technique has an active sensor and is, therefore, independent of light conditions, able to obtain accurate high spatial and temporal resolution point clouds. In this study, a movement parameterization approach of leaf plants based on TLiDAR is introduced. For this purpose, two Calathea roseopicta plants were scanned in an indoor environment during 2 full-days, 1 day in natural light conditions and the other in darkness. The methodology to estimate leaf movement is based on segmenting individual leaves using an octree-based 3D-grid and monitoring the changes in their orientation by Principal Component Analysis. Additionally, canopy variations of the plant as a whole were characterized by a convex-hull approach. As a result, 9 leaves in plant 1 and 11 leaves in plant 2 were automatically detected with a global accuracy of 93.57 and 87.34%, respectively, compared to a manual detection. Regarding plant 1, in natural light conditions, the displacement average of the leaves between 7.00 a.m. and 12.30 p.m. was 3.67 cm as estimated using so-called deviation maps. The maximum displacement was 7.92 cm. In addition, the orientation changes of each leaf within a day were analyzed. The maximum variation in the vertical angle was 69.6° from 12.30 to 6.00 p.m. In darkness, the displacements were smaller and showed a different orientation pattern. The canopy volume of plant 1 changed more in the morning (4.42 dm3) than in the afternoon (2.57 dm3). The results of plant 2 largely confirmed the results of the first plant and were added to check the robustness of the methodology. The results show how to quantify leaf orientation variation and leaf movements along a day at mm accuracy in different light conditions. This confirms the feasibility of the proposed methodology to robustly analyse leaf movements.

[1]  R. Lindenbergh,et al.  Morphological Changes Along a Dike Landside Slope Sampled by 4d High Resolution Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2016 .

[2]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Fast Automatic Precision Tree Models from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[3]  E. Tobin,et al.  All in good time: the Arabidopsis circadian clock. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[4]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[5]  Nico Blodow,et al.  Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[6]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Graphical Representation of Data Using Principal Components , 1986 .

[7]  Dick Vreugdenhil,et al.  Plants under continuous light. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[8]  M. Homer,et al.  Impact of plant shoot architecture on leaf cooling: a coupled heat and mass transfer model , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Quantification of Overnight Movement of Birch (Betula pendula) Branches and Foliage with Short Interval Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[10]  R. Dutton,et al.  Delaunay triangulation and 3D adaptive mesh generation , 1997 .

[11]  S. Manel,et al.  Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence , 2001 .

[12]  George Vosselman,et al.  Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[13]  H. Spiecker,et al.  EVALUATION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING FOR STANDARDIZED FOREST INVENTORIES , 2004 .

[14]  Jun Zhou,et al.  Maximizing spectral radius of unoriented Laplacian matrix over bicyclic graphs of a given order , 2008 .

[15]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Optimum design of chamfer distance transforms , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  A. Walter,et al.  Aberrant temporal growth pattern and morphology of root and shoot caused by a defective circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2012, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[17]  Boris Jutzi,et al.  Semantic 3D scene interpretation: A framework combining optimal neighborhood size selection with relevant features , 2014 .

[18]  I. Xenarios,et al.  Measuring the diurnal pattern of leaf hyponasty and growth in Arabidopsis - a novel phenotyping approach using laser scanning. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[19]  W. K. Purves Life: The Science of Biology , 1985 .

[20]  M. Sobrado,et al.  Significance of leaf orientation for leaf temperature in an amazonian sclerophyll vegetation , 1978, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[21]  H. Mooney,et al.  Modeling the Exchanges of Energy, Water, and Carbon Between Continents and the Atmosphere , 1997, Science.

[22]  F. Chapin,et al.  Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology , 2002, Springer New York.

[23]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  Differentially Phased Leaf Growth and Movements in Arabidopsis Depend on Coordinated Circadian and Light Regulation[W] , 2014, Plant Cell.

[24]  Malia A. Gehan,et al.  Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. , 2015, Current opinion in plant biology.

[25]  Marco Attene,et al.  A lightweight approach to repairing digitized polygon meshes , 2010, The Visual Computer.

[26]  M. Stitt,et al.  Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in growth. , 2012, Current opinion in plant biology.

[27]  K. Nishitani,et al.  Light Quality-Mediated Petiole Elongation in Arabidopsis during Shade Avoidance Involves Cell Wall Modification by Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylase/Hydrolases1[C][W][OA] , 2010, Plant Physiology.

[28]  A. Gruen,et al.  Least squares 3D surface and curve matching , 2005 .

[29]  Semyung Wang,et al.  A new segmentation method for point cloud data , 2002 .

[30]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. I. Leaf model parametrization , 1995 .

[31]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. , 2013, Annual review of plant biology.

[32]  M. Fournier,et al.  The use of terrestrial LiDAR technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[33]  Lutz Plümer,et al.  Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping , 2014, Sensors.

[34]  H. Pretzsch Forest Dynamics, Growth, and Yield , 2010 .

[35]  R. Hangarter,et al.  The "sensational" power of movement in plants: A Darwinian system for studying the evolution of behavior. , 2009, American journal of botany.

[36]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[37]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  CHANGES IN LEAF CHARACTERISTICS OF SPECIES ALONG ELEVATIONAL GRADIENTS IN THE WASATCH FRONT, UTAH. , 1988, American journal of botany.

[38]  E. M. Farré,et al.  The regulation of plant growth by the circadian clock. , 2012, Plant biology.

[39]  Marina I. Sysoeva,et al.  Plants under Continuous Light: A Review , 2010 .