Comparative analysis of flow patterns in aquaculture rectangular tanks with different water inlet characteristics

The objective of the work is to improve the design rules of rectangular aquaculture tanks in order to achieve better culture conditions and improve water use efficiency. Particle tracking velocimetry techniques (PTV) are used to evaluate the flow pattern in the tanks. PTV is a non-intrusive experimental method for investigating fluid flows using tracer particles and measuring a full velocity field in a slice of flow. It is useful for analysing the effect of tank geometries and water inlet and outlet emplacements. Different water entry configurations were compared, including single and multiple waterfalls and centred and tangential submerged entries. The appearance of dead volumes is especially important in configurations with a single entry. Configuration with a single waterfall entry shows a zone of intense mixing around the inlet occupying a semicircular area with a radius around 2.5 times the water depth. A centred submerged entry generates a poor mixing of entering and remaining water, promoting the existence of short-circuiting streams. When multiple waterfalls are used, the distance between them is shown to have a strong influence on the uniformity of the velocity field, increasing noticeably when the distance between inlets is reduced from 3.8 to 2.5 times the water depth. The average velocities in configurations with multiple waterfalls are very low outside the entrance area, facilitating the sedimentation of biosolids (faeces and non-ingested feed) on the tank bottom. The horizontal tangential inlet allows the achievement of higher and more uniform velocities in the tank, making it easy to prevent the sedimentation of biosolids.

[1]  R. Kamaruddin,et al.  SE—Structures and Environment: Effect of Ventilator Configuration on Wind-driven Ventilation in a Crop Protection Structure for the Tropics , 2001 .

[2]  Dale C. Honeyfield,et al.  Hydraulic characteristics of a rectangular mixed-cell rearing unit , 2000 .

[3]  R. Burley,et al.  Flow distribution studies in fish rearing tanks. Part 2—Analysis of hydraulic performance of 1m square tanks , 1985 .

[4]  Thomas B. Lawson,et al.  Fundamentals of Aquacultural Engineering , 1995, Springer US.

[5]  R. Burley,et al.  Flow distribution studies in fish rearing tanks. Part 1 — Design constraints , 1984 .

[6]  Barnaby J. Watten,et al.  Influence of tank design and hydraulic loading on the behavior, growth, and metabolism of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) , 1995 .

[7]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Sedimentation in Storage Tank Structures , 1994 .

[8]  Michael B. Timmons,et al.  Review of circular tank technology and management , 1998 .

[9]  M. G. Poxton,et al.  A Review of the Design and Performance of Tanks Relevant to Flatfish Culture , 1992 .

[10]  S. J. Cripps,et al.  A method for the quantification and optimization of hydrodynamics in culture tanks , 2004, Aquaculture International.

[11]  Barnaby J. Watten,et al.  Comparative hydraulics and rearing trial performance of a production scale cross-flow rearing unit , 1990 .

[12]  Barnaby J. Watten,et al.  Comparative hydraulics of a rectangular cross-flow rearing unit , 1987 .

[13]  S Skybakmoen Impact of water hydraulics on water quality in fish rearing units , 1989 .

[14]  Octave Levenspiel,et al.  The chemical reactor minibook , 1979 .

[15]  Atle Jensen,et al.  Properties of large-amplitude internal waves , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Atle Jensen,et al.  Measurements of velocity fields in internal gravity waves. Documentation of experimental method , 1998 .