Comparing the classification performance of Bayesian linear discriminate analysis (BLDA) and support vector machine (SVM) in BCI P300-speller with familiar face paradigm

P300-speller which relies on P300-event related potential (ERP) is an important application of the BCI system. However, the accuracy and information transmission rate were relatively low for practical use. To solve the problem, researchers focused on two aspects of paradigms and classifiers. P300-speller with familiar face paradigm achieved a better performance. In addition, Bayesian linear discriminate analysis (BLDA) was successfully applied to classifier in the P300-speller with familiar face paradigm. However, BLDA needed the large scale of training set to ensure the accuracy of classification. Subjects gradually got sleepy during the period of training set collection, which resulted in an ambiguous unobvious difference between the attended and unattended characters, and affected the accuracy of classification. Support vector machine (SVM) is a strong classification method which achieves a very good classification in the case of small training set. However, whether SVM has a good performance on a familiar face paradigm or not remains unclear. In this study, we compared the classification performance of BLDA and SVM in BCI P300-speller with familiar face paradigm. In the condition in which the size of the training set is very small, P300-speller achieved a better performance using SVM classifier than using BLDA classifier. Along with gradually increasing of the size of the training set, the difference of classification performance between SVM and BLDA becomes small. Our results demonstrated the classification performance of SVM is better than that of BLDA in P300-speller with familiar face paradigm using a small training set.

[1]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A P300 event-related potential brain–computer interface (BCI): The effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[2]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  A. Cichocki,et al.  The Changing Face of P300 BCIs: A Comparison of Stimulus Changes in a P300 BCI Involving Faces, Emotion, and Movement , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Michael Snodgrass,et al.  Subliminal visual oddball stimuli evoke a P300 component , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Guido Sanguinetti,et al.  Single-trial classification of EEG in a visual object task using ICA and machine learning , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  M Salvaris,et al.  Visual modifications on the P300 speller BCI paradigm , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  B.Z. Allison,et al.  ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Alain Rakotomamonjy,et al.  BCI Competition III: Dataset II- Ensemble of SVMs for BCI P300 Speller , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Olga Sourina,et al.  Real-time EEG-based user's valence monitoring , 2015, 2015 10th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS).

[11]  Olga Sourina,et al.  Real-time EEG-based emotion monitoring using stable features , 2015, The Visual Computer.

[12]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  BCI competition 2003-data set IIb: support vector machines for the P300 speller paradigm , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Matthias Kaper P300 based brain computer interfacing , 2006 .

[16]  M. Eimer Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Characterization of four-class motor imagery EEG data for the BCI-competition 2005 , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  G.F. Inbar,et al.  An improved P300-based brain-computer interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  H. Ritter,et al.  Progress in P300-based brain-computer interfacing , 2004, IEEE International Workshop on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 2004..

[21]  J. Touryan,et al.  Real-Time Measurement of Face Recognition in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[22]  Olga Sourina,et al.  Neurofeedback games for the enhancement of cognitive abilities related to multitasking , 2014 .

[23]  Shuai Liu,et al.  Use of a Green Familiar Faces Paradigm Improves P300-Speller Brain-Computer Interface Performance , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  J. Cohen,et al.  P300, stimulus intensity, modality, and probability. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[25]  B. Blankertz,et al.  (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[26]  A. Kübler,et al.  Flashing characters with famous faces improves ERP-based brain–computer interface performance , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  Brendan Z Allison,et al.  Effects of SOA and flash pattern manipulations on ERPs, performance, and preference: implications for a BCI system. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[28]  D J McFarland,et al.  An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[30]  Jonathan B Freeman,et al.  The face-sensitive N170 encodes social category information , 2010, Neuroreport.

[31]  E. W. Sellers,et al.  Toward enhanced P300 speller performance , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Olga Sourina,et al.  EEG Based Stress Monitoring , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.