Can synergy in Triple Helix relations be quantified? A review of the development of the Triple Helix indicator

Triple Helix arrangements of bi- and trilateral relations can be considered as adaptive ecosystems. During the last decade, we have further developed a Triple Helix indicator of synergy as reduction of uncertainty in niches that can be shaped among three or more sets of relations. Reduction of uncertainty can be generated in correlations among distributions of relations, but this (next-order) effect can be considered as a feedback counterbalancing the uncertainty generated in the localized relations. We first explain the indicator and then review possible results when this indicator is applied to (i) co-author networks of academic, industrial, and governmental authors and (ii) synergies in the distributions of firms over geographical addresses, technological classes, and industrial-size classes for a number of nations. Co-variation is then considered as a measure of relationship. The balance between globalizing and localizing dynamics can be quantified. Too much synergy locally can also be considered as lock-in. Tendencies are different for the globalizing knowledge dynamics versus locally retaining wealth from knowledge in industrial innovations.

[1]  Loet Leydesdorff The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? , 2010 .

[2]  Raymond W. Yeung,et al.  Information Theory and Network Coding , 2008 .

[3]  Raymond Vernon,et al.  The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment , 2009 .

[4]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Can Synergy in Triple-Helix Relations Be Quantified? A Review of the Development of the Triple-Helix Indicator , 2014 .

[5]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  J G Daugman,et al.  Information Theory and Coding , 2005 .

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A simulation model of the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations and the decomposition of the redundancy , 2014, Scientometrics.

[8]  Freiberger Arbeitspapiere,et al.  Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics , 2005 .

[9]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Role of Research Centres in the Collectivisation of Academic Science , 1998 .

[10]  Ulrich Teichler,et al.  University rankings : theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education , 2011 .

[11]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage , 2006 .

[13]  William J. McGill Multivariate information transmission , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[14]  I. Prigogine,et al.  From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences , 1982 .

[15]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[16]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Is Inequality Among Universities Increasing? Gini Coefficients and the Elusive Rise of Elite Universities , 2010, Minerva.

[17]  P Hougaard Statistical decomposition analysis : a conceptual synthesis of a probalistic function , 1982 .

[18]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Mapping university-industry-government relations on the Internet: The construction of indicators for a knowledge-based economy. , 2000 .

[19]  Kevin Grant,et al.  Triple Helix indicators as an emergent area of enquiry: a bibliometric perspective , 2014, Scientometrics.

[20]  Yuan Sun,et al.  Measuring the relationships among university, industry and other sectors in Japan’s national innovation system: a comparison of new approaches with mutual information indicators , 2010, Scientometrics.

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[22]  Matthew A. Shapiro,et al.  Regional development in South Korea: accounting for research area in centrality and networks , 2011, Scientometrics.

[23]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[24]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[25]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Rotational Symmetry and the Transformation of Innovation Systems in a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2012, ArXiv.

[26]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix Model and the Meta-Stabilization of Urban Technologies in Smart Cities , 2010, 1003.3344.

[27]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level , 2009, 0912.3101.

[28]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea , 2011, Scientometrics.

[29]  Sujin Choi,et al.  The triple helix and international collaboration in science , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems: Steps toward a calculus of processing meaning , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Information of interactions in complex systems , 2009, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[32]  Marco Bellandi,et al.  From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research , 2003 .

[33]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Measuring the triple helix on the web: Longitudinal trends in the university-industry-government relationship in Korea , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Mapping election campaigns through negative entropy: Triple and Quadruple Helix approach to South Korea’s 2012 presidential election , 2013, Scientometrics.

[35]  F. Tödtling,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems , 2011 .

[36]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A reply to Etzkowitz’ comments to Leydesdorff and Martin (2010): technology transfer and the end of the Bayh–Dole effect , 2013, Scientometrics.

[37]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Swedish System of Innovation: Regional Synergies in a Knowledge-Based Economy , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  Lock-in & Break-out from Technological Trajectories: Modeling and policy implications , 2009, 0911.1311.

[39]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics , 2003, Scientometrics.

[40]  G. Simmel The Number of Members as Determining the Sociological Form of the Group. I , 1902, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[42]  Matthew A. Shapiro,et al.  Quantifying the national innovation system: inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[43]  Fabio Sforzi,et al.  From Industrial Districts to Local Development , 2003 .

[44]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: The Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations , 2010 .

[45]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[46]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[47]  B. Carlsson Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[48]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The triple helix perspective of innovation systems , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[49]  O. Morgenstern,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. , 1940 .

[50]  Henry Etzkowi,et al.  The Triple Helix of University - Industry - Government , 2002 .

[51]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[52]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action , 2008 .

[53]  Sujin Choi,et al.  Using social media data to explore communication processes within South Korean online innovation communities , 2011, Scientometrics.

[54]  Marko M. Skoric The implications of big data for developing and transitional economies: Extending the Triple Helix? , 2013, Scientometrics.

[55]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Redundancy Generation in University-Industry-Government Relations: The Triple Helix Modeled, Measured, and Simulated , 2013, ArXiv.

[56]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development , 2005 .

[57]  Werner Ebeling,et al.  Nonlinear stochastic effects of substitution — an evolutionary approach , 1996 .

[58]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography , 2011, 1109.6597.

[59]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  How sub-national conditions affect regional innovation systems: The case of the two Germanys , 2011 .

[60]  Apresentação Paulo Bastos Tigre Bengt-Åke Lundvall - Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation , 2009 .

[61]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[62]  Aleks Jakulin Machine Learning Based on Attribute Interactions , 2005 .

[63]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives , 2009, 0912.3100.

[64]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  A comparison of the Daegu and Edinburgh musical industries: a triple helix approach , 2011, Scientometrics.

[65]  Hareesha Mk,et al.  "Environmentalism and Forest Rights of Tribals in Dakshina Kannada, Udupi and Uttara Kannada Districts of Karnataka " , 2009 .

[66]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Redundancy in Systems which Entertain a Model of Themselves: Interaction Information and the Self-organization of Anticipation , 2010, Entropy.

[67]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Ross Ashby's information theory: a bit of history, some solutions to problems, and what we face today , 2009, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[68]  Helix Dynamics,et al.  Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple , 2005 .

[69]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Knowledge-Generating Efficiency in Innovation Systems: The Relation between Structural and Temporal Effects , 2014, ArXiv.

[70]  R. Ulanowicz Ecology, the ascendent perspective , 1997 .

[71]  W. J. McGill Multivariate information transmission , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[72]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The New Communication Regime of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1997 .

[73]  T. Tsujishita,et al.  On Triple Mutual Information , 1994 .

[74]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix in the context of global change: dynamics and challenges , 2012 .

[75]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications , 2001 .

[76]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Measuring Twitter-based political participation and deliberation in the South Korean context by using social network and Triple Helix indicators , 2011, Scientometrics.

[77]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?: A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology , 2010 .

[78]  C. Wagner,et al.  The New Invisible College , 2009 .

[79]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies , 1994 .

[80]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2014 .

[81]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[82]  Te Sun Han,et al.  Multiple Mutual Informations and Multiple Interactions in Frequency Data , 1980, Inf. Control..

[83]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Technological developments and factor substitution in a complex and dynamic system. , 1998 .

[84]  George A. Agoston,et al.  From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences by Ilya Prigogine (review) , 1982 .

[85]  Mark Deakin,et al.  Smart Cities : Governing, Modelling and Analysing the Transition , 2013 .

[86]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[87]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory' , 2004, 0911.3414.

[88]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Challenges for regional innovation policies in Central and Eastern Europe , 2015 .

[89]  M. Deakin,et al.  The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective , 2011 .

[90]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[91]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh–Dole effect , 2009, Scientometrics.

[92]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  Lock-in and break-out from technological trajectories: Modeling and policy implications , 2009 .

[93]  R. Ulanowicz Growth and development : ecosystems phenomenology , 1988 .

[94]  L. Leydesdorff The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development , 1995 .

[95]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge-based economy of China in terms of synergy among technological, organizational, and geographic attributes of firms , 2013, Scientometrics.

[96]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[97]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009 .

[98]  W. Ashby,et al.  Constraint analysis of many-dimensional relations. , 1965, Progress in biocybernetics.

[99]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change , 2007 .

[100]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The relation between information and variance analyses , 1956 .

[101]  Ashby Wr,et al.  Constraint analysis of many-dimensional relations. , 1965 .

[102]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  International Collaboration within Electronic Government Research Domain , 2011 .

[103]  Henry Etzkowitz Mistaking dawn for dusk: quantophrenia and the cult of numerology in technology transfer analysis , 2013, Scientometrics.

[104]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[105]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[106]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  The Odd Role of Proximity in Knowledge Relations - High-Tech in the Netherlands , 2002 .

[107]  B. Lundvall National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[108]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring triple‐helix synergy in the Russian innovation systems at regional, provincial, and national levels , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[109]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Challenges for Regional Innovation Policies in CEE Countries: Spatial Concentration and Foreign Control of US Patenting , 2013, 1301.1757.

[110]  Ki-Seok KwonHan,et al.  Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea , 2012 .

[111]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  The dual nature of ecosystem dynamics , 2009 .

[112]  Jacqueline E. W. Broerse,et al.  The Triple Helix Enriched with the User Perspective: A View from Bangladesh , 1999 .

[113]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A routine for measuring synergy in university–industry–government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator , 2013, Scientometrics.

[114]  M. Storper The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .