Willingness to pay for personalised nutrition across Europe.

BACKGROUND Personalised nutrition (PN) may promote public health. PN involves dietary advice based on individual characteristics of end users and can for example be based on lifestyle, blood and/or DNA profiling. Currently, PN is not refunded by most health insurance or health care plans. Improved public health is contingent on individual consumers being willing to pay for the service. METHODS A survey with a representative sample from the general population was conducted in eight European countries (N = 8233). Participants reported their willingness to pay (WTP) for PN based on lifestyle information, lifestyle and blood information, and lifestyle and DNA information. WTP was elicited by contingent valuation with the price of a standard, non-PN advice used as reference. RESULTS About 30% of participants reported being willing to pay more for PN than for non-PN advice. They were on average prepared to pay about 150% of the reference price of a standard, non-personalised advice, with some differences related to socio-demographic factors. CONCLUSION There is a potential market for PN compared to non-PN advice, particularly among men on higher incomes. These findings raise questions to what extent personalized nutrition can be left to the market or should be incorporated into public health programs.

[1]  Comparative price levels , 2018, Main Economic Indicators.

[2]  T. Hurt,et al.  Developing Effective Diabetes Programming for Black Men , 2015, Global qualitative nursing research.

[3]  A. Fischer,et al.  Consumer adoption of personalised nutrition services from the perspective of a risk–benefit trade-off , 2015, Genes & Nutrition.

[4]  E. Crimmins Physiological Differences Across Populations Reflecting Early Life and Later Life Nutritional Status and Later Life Risk for Chronic Disease , 2015, Journal of population ageing.

[5]  B. Bunting,et al.  Psychological Determinants of Consumer Acceptance of Personalised Nutrition in 9 European Countries , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  A. Fischer,et al.  Understanding Consumer Evaluations of Personalised Nutrition Services in Terms of the Privacy Calculus: A Qualitative Study , 2014, Public Health Genomics.

[7]  D. Rehkopf,et al.  Educational attainment and obesity: a systematic review , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[8]  J. Goossens,et al.  Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model? , 2013, Genes & Nutrition.

[9]  M. Walsh,et al.  Conference on ‘ Translating nutrition : integrating research , practice and policy ’ Symposium 2 : Intervention study design and personalised nutrition The future direction of personalised nutrition : my diet , my phenotype , my genes , 2013 .

[10]  Klaus Miller,et al.  How Should Consumers’ Willingness to Pay be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches , 2011 .

[11]  M. Mckee,et al.  The burden of disease attributable to nutrition in Europe , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[12]  W. R. Aykroyd Nutrition in Europe , 1960, Nature.

[13]  A. Fischer,et al.  Newcastle University Eprints Date Deposited: 10 Results of a Qualitative Analysis. 2 , 2022 .