Evaluation of the Energy Expenditure in Competitive Swimming Strokes

The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the total energy expenditure of the four competitive swimming strokes. Twenty-six swimmers of international level were submitted to an incremental set of 200-m swims (5 swimmers at Breaststroke, 5 swimmers at Backstroke, 4 swimmers at Butterfly and 12 swimmers at Front Crawl). The starting velocity was approximately 0.3 m x s (-1) less than a swimmer's best performance and thereafter increased by 0.05 m x s (-1) after each swim until exhaustion. Cardio-pulmonary and gas exchange parameters were measured breath-by-breath (BxB) for each swim to analyze oxygen consumption (VO2) and other energetic parameters by portable metabolic cart (K4b(2), Cosmed, Rome, Italy). A respiratory snorkel and valve system with low hydrodynamic resistance was used to measure pulmonary ventilation and to collect breathing air samples. Blood samples from the ear lobe were collected before and after each swim to analyze blood lactate concentration (YSI 1500 L, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA). Total energy expenditure (E(tot)), was calculated for each 200-m stage. E (tot) differed significantly between the strokes at all selected velocities. At the velocity of 1.0 m x s (-1) and of 1.2 m x s (-1) the E(tot) was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.4 m x s (-1), the E(tot) was significantly higher in Breaststroke than in Backstroke, in Backstroke than in Freestyle, in Breaststroke than in Freestyle and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. At the velocity of 1.6 m x s (-1), the E(tot) was significantly higher in Breaststroke and in Butterfly than in Freestyle. As a conclusion, E(tot) of well-trained competitive swimmers was measured over a large range of velocities utilising a new BxB technique. Freestyle was shown to be the most economic among the competitive swimming strokes, followed by the Backstroke, the Butterfly and the Breaststroke.

[1]  I. Holmér Physiology of swimming man. , 1979, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[2]  Joan D. Werner,et al.  Swimming Medicine IV , 1979 .

[3]  R Fielding,et al.  Energy Expenditure During Front Crawl Swimming: Predicting Success in Middle-Distance Events , 1985, International journal of sports medicine.

[4]  J. Paulo Vilas-Boas,et al.  Comparison of Swimming Economy in Three Breaststroke Techniques , 1994 .

[5]  K Wakayoshi,et al.  Relationship between oxygen uptake, stroke rate and swimming velocity in competitive swimming. , 1995, International journal of sports medicine.

[6]  H. Thys,et al.  An Evaluation of the Maximal Anaerobic Capacity in Man , 1991, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[7]  C. Maiolo,et al.  Physical activity energy expenditure measured using a portable telemetric device in comparison with a mass spectrometer , 2003, British journal of sports medicine.

[8]  宮下 充正,et al.  Medicine and science in aquatic sports , 1994 .

[9]  Peter V. Karpovich,et al.  Energy expenditure in swimming. , 1944 .

[10]  Kari L. Keskinen,et al.  Intracycle variation in force, velocity and power as a measure of technique performance during front crawl swimming , 1994 .

[11]  Tiago M. Barbosa,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF BUTTERFLY AVERAGE RESULTANT IMPULSE PER PHASE , 2002 .

[12]  Brian J. Gordon,et al.  Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Competitive Swimmers of Different Genders and Performance Levels , 1997 .

[13]  J. Gomes-Pereira,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SWIMMING VELOCITY ON THE KINEMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF BACKSTROKE SWIMMING , 1998 .

[14]  H. Perrault,et al.  The aerobic demand of backstroke swimming, and its relation to body size, stroke technique, and performance , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[15]  A. P. Hollander,et al.  Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VII , 1996 .

[16]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 Portable Metabolic System , 2001, International journal of sports medicine.

[17]  K. Keskinen,et al.  Respiratory snorkel and valve system for breath‐by‐breath gas analysis in swimming , 2003, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports.

[18]  J. Juchmes,et al.  Equivalent énergétique de la production du lactate plasmatique dans la course d'intensité supramaximale , 1984 .

[19]  P. Zamparo,et al.  Effects of body size, body density, gender and growth on underwater torque , 1996, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[20]  T Yanai,et al.  Rotational effect of buoyancy in frontcrawl: Does it really cause the legs to sink? , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  C. Hausswirth,et al.  The Cosmed K4 Telemetry System as an Accurate Device for Oxygen Uptake Measurements during Exercise , 1997, International journal of sports medicine.

[22]  Klaus Reischle,et al.  Swimming science V , 1988 .

[23]  F. Alves,et al.  AVERAGE RESUlTANT IMPULSE PER PHASE IN SWIMMING: A TOOl FOR TECHNICAl ANALYSIS , 1996 .

[24]  J. Chatard,et al.  Analysis of determinants of swimming economy in front crawl , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[25]  J. Lavoie,et al.  Applied Physiology of Swimming , 1986, Sports medicine.