The Thiamine diphosphate dependent Enzyme Engineering Database: A tool for the systematic analysis of sequence and structure relations

BackgroundThiamine diphosphate (ThDP)-dependent enzymes form a vast and diverse class of proteins, catalyzing a wide variety of enzymatic reactions including the formation or cleavage of carbon-sulfur, carbon-oxygen, carbon-nitrogen, and especially carbon-carbon bonds. Although very diverse in sequence and domain organisation, they share two common protein domains, the pyrophosphate (PP) and the pyrimidine (PYR) domain. For the comprehensive and systematic comparison of protein sequences and structures the Thiamine diphosphate (ThDP)-dependent Enzyme Engineering Database (TEED) was established.DescriptionThe TEED http://www.teed.uni-stuttgart.de contains 12048 sequence entries which were assigned to 9443 different proteins and 379 structure entries. Proteins were assigned to 8 different superfamilies and 63 homologous protein families. For each family, the TEED offers multisequence alignments, phylogenetic trees, and family-specific HMM profiles. The conserved pyrophosphate (PP) and pyrimidine (PYR) domains have been annotated, which allows the analysis of sequence similarities for a broad variety of proteins. Human ThDP-dependent enzymes are known to be involved in many diseases. 20 different proteins and over 40 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of human ThDP-dependent enzymes were identified in the TEED.ConclusionsThe online accessible version of the TEED has been designed to serve as a navigation and analysis tool for the large and diverse family of ThDP-dependent enzymes.

[1]  G. Barton,et al.  Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: Assignment of global and residue confidence levels , 1992, Proteins.

[2]  D. Enders,et al.  Organocatalysis by N-heterocyclic carbenes. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[3]  A. Schellenberger,et al.  Sixty years of thiamin diphosphate biochemistry. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Elizabeth M. Smigielski,et al.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Sabine Laschat,et al.  Rational Design of a Minimal and Highly Enriched CYP102A1 Mutant Library with Improved Regio‐, Stereo‐ and Chemoselectivity , 2009, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[7]  B. Luisi,et al.  Structure, mechanism and catalytic duality of thiamine-dependent enzymes , 2007, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[8]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  P. Siegert,et al.  Application of α-keto acid decarboxylases in biotransformations , 1998 .

[10]  P. Martin,et al.  A transketolase assembly defect in a Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome patient. , 1997, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[11]  Jürgen Pleiss,et al.  The Lipase Engineering Database: a navigation and analysis tool for protein families , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  K. Zeitler,et al.  Extending mechanistic routes in heterazolium catalysis--promising concepts for versatile synthetic methods. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[14]  Jürgen Pleiss,et al.  The PHA Depolymerase Engineering Database: A systematic analysis tool for the diverse family of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) depolymerases , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[15]  Jing Zhao 赵静,et al.  A review on research progress of transketolase , 2009, Neuroscience Bulletin.

[16]  G. Schneider,et al.  Structure of the branched-chain keto acid decarboxylase (KdcA) from Lactococcus lactis provides insights into the structural basis for the chemoselective and enantioselective carboligation reaction. , 2007, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[17]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[18]  C. Walsh,et al.  Escherichia coli glyoxalate carboligase. Properties and reconstitution with 5-deazaFAD and 1,5-dihydrodeazaFADH2. , 1976, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  E. Feldman.  Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease , 1999 .

[20]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Profile hidden Markov models , 1998, Bioinform..

[21]  Michael Müller,et al.  Thiamin diphosphate in biological chemistry: exploitation of diverse thiamin diphosphate‐dependent enzymes for asymmetric chemoenzymatic synthesis , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[22]  David L. Wheeler,et al.  GenBank , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  P. Dalby,et al.  Evolutionary Analysis of the TPP-Dependent Enzyme Family , 2007, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[24]  R. Duggleby,et al.  Structure and properties of pyruvate decarboxylase and site-directed mutagenesis of the Zymomonas mobilis enzyme. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  I. Longden,et al.  EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[26]  R. Perham,et al.  A common structural motif in thiamin pyrophosphate‐binding enzymes , 1989, FEBS letters.

[27]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  G. Sprenger,et al.  A new perspective on thiamine catalysis. , 2004, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[29]  S. Bornemann,et al.  Stereochemistry of the formation of lactaldehyde and acetoin produced by the pyruvate decarboxylases of yeast (Saccharomyces sp.) and Zymomonas mobilis: different Boltzmann distributions between bound forms of the electrophile, acetaldehyde, in the two enzymatic reactions , 1993 .

[30]  Geoffrey J. Barton,et al.  TarO: a target optimisation system for structural biology , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  P. Nixon,et al.  Identification of the catalytic glutamate in the E1 component of human pyruvate dehydrogenase , 1998, FEBS letters.

[32]  Frank Jordan,et al.  Current mechanistic understanding of thiamin diphosphate-dependent enzymatic reactions. , 2003, Natural product reports.

[33]  Martina Pohl,et al.  Reaction engineering of benzaldehyde lyase from Pseudomonas fluorescens catalyzing enantioselective C-C bond formation , 2006 .

[34]  Jürgen Pleiss,et al.  DWARF – a data warehouse system for analyzing protein families , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[35]  F. Jordan.  Current Mechanistic Understanding of Thiamin Diphosphate-Dependent Enzymatic Reactions , 2003 .

[36]  BMC Biochemistry , 2004 .

[37]  G. Mannaerts,et al.  Alpha-oxidation of 3-methyl-substituted fatty acids and its thiamine dependence. , 2003, European journal of biochemistry.

[38]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  InterProScan - an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro , 2001, Bioinform..

[39]  Alexander Seifert,et al.  Identification of selectivity‐determining residues in cytochrome P450 monooxygenases: A systematic analysis of the substrate recognition site 5 , 2009, Proteins.

[40]  P. Martin,et al.  Aspartate 155 of human transketolase is essential for thiamine diphosphate-magnesium binding, and cofactor binding is required for dimer formation. , 1997, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[41]  K. Mimori,et al.  A single-nucleotide polymorphism of SMARCB1 in human breast cancers. , 2002, Genomics.

[42]  A. Sewell,et al.  4,5-Dimethyl-3-hydroxy-2[5H]-furanone (sotolone) — The odour of maple syrup urine disease , 1999, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[43]  A. Demir,et al.  Thiamine pyrophosphate dependent enzyme catalyzed reactions : Stereoselective C-C bond formations in water , 2007 .

[44]  R. Duggleby.  Domain relationships in thiamine diphosphate-dependent enzymes. , 2006, Accounts of chemical research.