Path curvature in workspace and in joint space: evidence for coexisting coordinative rules in aiming.

In this study we tried to establish whether point-to-point aiming movements are planned in workspace, joint space, or both. Eight right-handed subjects performed horizontal, vertical, and diagonal aiming movements on a transversal plane. Movements were performed at several speeds. Curvature variations of the hand and corresponding joint-space paths were investigated as a function of position, direction, and speed. Straightness of hand paths predominated for vertical movements but was systematically violated for horizontal and top-right to bottom-left movements. Furthermore, the hand-path curvature of the latter movements increased with speed. Joint-space paths showed more deviation from a straight line than hand paths except for top-left to bottom-right movements in which the paths were equally curved. A comparison of normalized path curvatures at the hand and joint level indicated that in aiming, the coordinative rule of straight-line production seems to apply to both workspace and joint-space planning. The present findings confirm Kawato's (1996) views that optimization processes operate concurrently at the two control levels of arm-trajectory formation under study.

[1]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  M Hallett,et al.  Kinematics of Initiating a Two-Joint Arm Movement in Patients with Cerebellar Ataxia , 1996, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[4]  J Richardson,et al.  Spatial patterns in the control of human arm movement. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Lambert Schomaker,et al.  Limb-Segment Selection in Drawing Behaviour , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  E. Poulton Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Stroke-direction preferences in drawing and handwriting , 1991 .

[8]  R Osu,et al.  Possible explanations for trajectory curvature in multijoint arm movements. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Planning Reaches by Evaluating Stored Postures. , 1995 .

[11]  T. Flash,et al.  Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Controlling multijoint motor behavior. , 1987, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.