Competing harvesting strategies in a simulated population under uncertainty

We present a case study of the use of simulation modelling to develop and test strategies for managing populations under uncertainty. Strategies that meet a stock conservation criterion under a base case scenario are subjected to a set of robustness trials, including biased and highly variable abundance estimates and poaching. Strategy performance is assessed with respect to a conservation criterion, the revenues achieved and their variability. Strategies that harvest heavily, even when the population is apparently very large, perform badly in the robustness trials. Setting a threshold below which harvesting does not take place, and above which all individuals are harvested, does not provide effective protection against over‐harvesting. Strategies that rely on population growth rates rather than estimates of population size are more robust to biased estimates. The strategies that are most robust to uncertainty are simple, involving harvesting a relatively small proportion of the population each year. The simulation modelling approach to exploring harvesting strategies is suggested as a useful tool for the assessment of the performance of competing strategies under uncertainty.

[1]  E. Leger,et al.  Conservation of Biological Resources , 2001 .

[2]  V Dayal,et al.  Report of the scientific committee. , 2000, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[3]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Marine protected areas for spatially structured exploited stocks , 2000 .

[4]  Murdoch K. McAllister,et al.  Formulating quantitative methods to evaluate fishery-management systems: what fishery processes should be modelled and what trade-offs should be made? , 1999 .

[5]  Mangel.  No‐take areas for sustainability of harvested species and a conservation invariant for marine reserves , 1998 .

[6]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  The ecology and management of the Saiga antelope in Kazakhstan , 1998 .

[7]  Jane Lubchenco,et al.  MARINE RESERVES ARE NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT FOR MARINE CONSERVATION , 1998 .

[8]  R. Lande,et al.  Harvesting Strategies for Fluctuating Populations Based on Uncertain Population Estimates , 1997 .

[9]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  A STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SAIGA ANTELOPE , 1997 .

[10]  C. Roberts.  Ecological advice for the global fisher crisis. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Why fisheries collapse and what to do about it. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  G. P. Kirkwood,et al.  Assessing the precautionary nature of fishery management strategies , 1996 .

[13]  Steinar Engen,et al.  Optimal Harvesting of Fluctuating Populations with a Risk of Extinction , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Justin G. Cook,et al.  The international whaling commission's revised management procedure as an example of a new approach to fishery management , 1995 .

[15]  E. Milner‐Gulland.  A population model for the management of the saiga antelope , 1994 .

[16]  M. Mangel.  Effects of High-Seas Driftnet Fisheries on the Northern Right Whale Dolphin Lissodelphis Borealis. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[18]  C. Walters,et al.  Are age-structured models appropriate for catch-effort data? , 1985 .

[19]  James N. Kremer,et al.  Ecological implications of parameter uncertainty in stochastic simulation , 1983 .