Bar Coding and Tracking in Pathology.

Bar coding and specimen tracking are intricately linked to pathology workflow and efficiency. In the pathology laboratory, bar coding facilitates many laboratory practices, including specimen tracking, automation, and quality management. Data obtained from bar coding can be used to identify, locate, standardize, and audit specimens to achieve maximal laboratory efficiency and patient safety. Variables that need to be considered when implementing and maintaining a bar coding and tracking system include assets to be labeled, bar code symbologies, hardware, software, workflow, and laboratory and information technology infrastructure as well as interoperability with the laboratory information system. This article addresses these issues, primarily focusing on surgical pathology.

[1]  David W. Bates,et al.  Effect of Bar-code Technology on the Safety of Medication Administration , 2010 .

[2]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Causes, consequences, detection, and prevention of identification errors in laboratory diagnostics , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[3]  Mislabeling of Cases, Specimens, Blocks, and Slides: A College of American Pathologists Study of 136 Institutions , 2012 .

[4]  Jerry J. Lou,et al.  Tolerance testing of passive radio frequency identification tags for solvent, temperature, and pressure conditions encountered in an anatomic pathology or biorepository setting , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[5]  Elisa Eiseman,et al.  Handbook of Human Tissue Sources , 1999 .

[6]  L. Pantanowitz,et al.  Tracking in anatomic pathology. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  L. Layfield,et al.  Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  Michael J Becich,et al.  Pathology and patient safety: the critical role of pathology informatics in error reduction and quality initiatives. , 2004, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[9]  Peter Gershkovich,et al.  Custom software development for use in a clinical laboratory , 2012, Journal of pathology informatics.

[10]  R. Nakhleh,et al.  Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  Ruan C. Varney,et al.  The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  Paul M. Seelinger,et al.  ASHP Statement on bar-code-enabled medication administration technology. , 2009, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[13]  M. G. Bissell.  Patient Misidentification in Laboratory Medicine: A Qualitative Analysis of 227 Root Cause Analysis Reports in the Veterans Health Administration , 2011 .

[14]  W. Mayr,et al.  Best paper prize of Vox Sanguinis for 2008 , 2010 .

[15]  P. Pagliaro,et al.  Patients' positive identification systems. , 2009, Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue.

[16]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Contemporary issues in transfusion medicine informatics , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[17]  Daniel F. Cowan,et al.  Bar Coding in the Laboratory , 2005 .

[18]  L Richmond,et al.  Barcoding in the lab: achieving error-free efficiencies. , 1994, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[19]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Patient misidentifications caused by errors in standard bar code technology. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  Rodeina Davis,et al.  RFID in the blood supply chain--increasing productivity, quality and patient safety. , 2009, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[21]  Jerry Holcombe,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of RFID Technology in Transfusion Medicine , 2010, Vox sanguinis.

[22]  Raouf E Nakhleh,et al.  Patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology. , 2008, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[23]  Robert H Christenson,et al.  Effectiveness of barcoding for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Clinical biochemistry.

[24]  I. Slaper-Cortenbach,et al.  ISBT 128 implementation plan for cellular therapy products , 2007, Journal of clinical apheresis.

[25]  Stuart R Lipsitz,et al.  Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[26]  P. Valenstein,et al.  Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine. , 2004, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[27]  Abha Agrawal.  Medication errors: prevention using information technology systems. , 2009, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[28]  Rajesh C. Dash,et al.  Biospecimens and biorepositories for the community pathologist. , 2012, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[29]  S. Freedland,et al.  Adiponectin and prostate cancer mortality: to be or not to be skinny? , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[30]  Jerry J. Lou,et al.  A review of radio frequency identification technology for the anatomic pathology or biorepository laboratory: Much promise, some progress, and more work needed , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.