Speech Perception and Localization With Adults With Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implants

This investigation reports measures of binaural hearing of all of our seven adults who have received sequential bilateral cochlear implants (range of time between implantation of 6 yr/8 mo and 17 yr). All subjects used both devices in everyday life. The internal array, number of channels, rate, and signal processing strategies were usually quite different between devices. Speech recognition was tested by using words in quiet and sentences in noise with the sentence stimuli presented from the front and the noise presented from the front, the right, or the left at a 90° angle. Bilateral localization was tested by using an everyday sounds test with stimuli presented from one of eight loudspeakers. Results showed that all subjects received a significant bilateral improvement on at least one speech perception test compared to either implant alone. Four of seven subjects with bilateral devices demonstrated some (root-mean-square error below 30°) localization abilities. The two subjects tested unilaterally before receiving a second implant showed a bilateral improvement on localization after implantation of the second side. We conclude that sequential implants can be beneficial even after many years of monaural use and even with very different cochlear implants.

[1]  Richard S Tyler,et al.  Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  J. Müller,et al.  Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[4]  Shelley Witt,et al.  Some benefits and limitations of binaural cochlear implants and our ability to measure them , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[5]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Arthur Boothroyd,et al.  A sentence test of speech perception: reliability, set equivalence, and short term learning , 1985 .

[7]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[8]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Localization Acuity Measured with Minimum Audible Angle , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Speech Understanding by Cochlear-Implant Patients with Different Left- and Right-Ear Electrode Arrays , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[10]  R Carhart,et al.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. , 1966, [Technical report] SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

[11]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Three-Month Results with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[12]  R. V. van Hoesel Exploring the Benefits of Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[13]  Richard S Tyler,et al.  Update on bilateral cochlear implantation , 2003, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[14]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.