Function of Positive Charges Following Signal-Anchor Sequences during Translocation of the N-terminal Domain*

In topogenesis of membrane proteins on the endoplasmic reticulum, the orientation of the hydrophobic transmembrane (TM) segment is influenced by the charge of the flanking amino acid residues. We assessed the function of the positive charges downstream of the hydrophobic segment using synaptotagmin II. The positive charges were systematically replaced with non-charged residues. Although the original TM segment translocated the N terminus, the topology was inverted, depending on the mutations. Orientation was affected in mutants in which 6 Lys were shifted downstream, even when the 6 Lys were 25 residues from the hydrophobic segment. The Lys was functionally replaced by Arg, but not by Asp or Glu. The timing of action during polypeptide elongation indicated that the Lys functions at the ribosome exit sites. We suggest that the commitment of the TM segment to a particular orientation is influenced by far downstream parts of the polypeptide chain and that the positive charges are decoded after exiting the ribosome.

[1]  Josep Rizo,et al.  Synaptotagmins: C2-Domain Proteins That Regulate Membrane Traffic , 1996, Neuron.

[2]  K. Mihara,et al.  Mitochondrial porin can be translocated across both endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial membranes. , 1992, Journal of biochemistry.

[3]  V. Goder,et al.  Topogenesis of membrane proteins: determinants and dynamics , 2001, FEBS letters.

[4]  K. Mihara,et al.  Translocation of a long amino‐terminal domain through ER membrane by following signal‐anchor sequence , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[5]  T. Kunkel.  Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  B. Martoglio,et al.  The protein-conducting channel in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum is open laterally toward the lipid bilayer , 1995, Cell.

[7]  K. Mikoshiba,et al.  Inositol-1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate binding to C2B domain of IP4BP/synaptotagmin II. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  G von Heijne,et al.  Topological Rules for Membrane Protein Assembly in Eukaryotic Cells* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  T. Hunt,et al.  Preparation and use of nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte lysates for the translation of eukaryotic messenger RNA. , 1983, Methods in enzymology.

[10]  G. Heijne,et al.  Recognition of transmembrane helices by the endoplasmic reticulum translocon , 2005, Nature.

[11]  G. Blobel,et al.  Preparation of microsomal membranes for cotranslational protein translocation. , 1983, Methods in enzymology.

[12]  M. Weiner,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis of double-stranded DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1994, Gene.

[13]  K. Mikoshiba,et al.  Membrane Topogenesis of a Type I Signal-Anchor Protein, Mouse Synaptotagmin Ii, on the Endoplasmic Reticulum , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  D. Andrews,et al.  The role of the N region in signal sequence and signal-anchor function. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  G. Fischbach,et al.  Neuregulin and ErbB receptor signaling pathways in the nervous system , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  J. Sgouros,et al.  Synaptotagmins: more isoforms than functions? , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  N. Hamasaki,et al.  The tenth membrane region of band 3 is initially exposed to the luminal side of the endoplasmic reticulum and then integrated into a partially folded band 3 intermediate. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[18]  T A Rapoport,et al.  Predicting the orientation of eukaryotic membrane-spanning proteins. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  P. Walter,et al.  Each of the activities of signal recognition particle (SRP) is contained within a distinct domain: Analysis of biochemical mutants of SRP , 1988, Cell.

[20]  Martin Spiess,et al.  Sec61p contributes to signal sequence orientation according to the positive-inside rule. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  G von Heijne,et al.  The COOH-terminal ends of internal signal and signal-anchor sequences are positioned differently in the ER translocase , 1994, Journal of Cell Biology.

[22]  R. Hegde,et al.  Membrane Protein Biogenesis: Regulated Complexity at the Endoplasmic Reticulum , 1997, Cell.

[23]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Formation of helical hairpins during membrane protein integration into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Role of the N and C-terminal flanking regions. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  K. Mihara,et al.  Functions of signal and signal-anchor sequences are determined by the balance between the hydrophobic segment and the N-terminal charge. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Jialing Lin,et al.  Both Lumenal and Cytosolic Gating of the Aqueous ER Translocon Pore Are Regulated from Inside the Ribosome during Membrane Protein Integration , 1997, Cell.

[26]  G von Heijne,et al.  Forced transmembrane orientation of hydrophilic polypeptide segments in multispanning membrane proteins. , 1998, Molecular cell.