A linguistic group decision-making framework for bid evaluation in mega public projects considering carbon dioxide emissions reduction

Green construction is to conserve the resources and reduce the negative impact of construction activities on the environment to the maximum extent, with scientific management and technological progress under the premise of ensuring the quality, safety and other basic requirements. Recent years, accompanied by the rapid development of construction industry, a considerable proportion of energy and resources, particularly high-carbon materials, is consumed in the construction activities, emitting mass greenhouse gases, which have a damaging impact on the environment. This is especially for the mega public projects. Therefore, under the green and sustainable perspective, actions to control carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the construction industry are imperative. In this case, if CO2 emissions reduction can be considered beforehand during the bid evaluation stage, contractors will be guided by bid evaluation indicators and therefore improve their construction schemes, enabling the construction phase to be green, energy saving and sustainable. This is because bid evaluation indicators can serve as guiding effect on the contractors. Given that CO2 emissions are rarely given sufficient consideration in traditional bid evaluation, this study conducts a systematic analysis to identify major sources of CO2 in construction phase and attempts to develop a conceptual computational model in terms of CO2 emission. Then, a linguistic group decision-making framework for bid evaluation in mega public projects considering CO2 emissions reduction is developed. In this framework, entropy, relative entropy, the standard deviation method and weighted aggregation operators are applied to determine the indicator weights, the expert weights and the information aggregation in bid evaluation decision-making. Finally, a scenario comparison between the proposed linguistic group decision-making bid evaluation framework and the traditional framework is made through a case study, and the scientific basis and reliability of this new framework are validated. The establishment of this framework can enrich the decision-making methods in construction management field. And it can provide meaningful reference for owners to choose the most qualified contractors and spur contractors to improve their construction schemes, enabling construction phase to be green, energy saving and sustainable.

[1]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[2]  Abdullah M. Alsugair Framework for Evaluating Bids of Construction Contractors , 1999 .

[3]  Bin Xue,et al.  A Group Decision-Making Aggregation Model for Contractor Selection in Large Scale Construction Projects Based on Two-Stage Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling , 2015 .

[4]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Assessment and evaluation of contractor data against client goals using PERT approach , 1997 .

[5]  Chunlu Liu,et al.  Malmquist indices of total factor productivity changes in the Australian construction industry , 2010 .

[6]  Ekambaram Palaneeswaran,et al.  Recent advances and proposed improvements in contractor prequalification methodologies , 2001 .

[7]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[8]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting , 2007, Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  J. Merigó,et al.  Linguistic power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making , 2012 .

[10]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Contractor selection criteria: a cost-benefit analysis , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[11]  B. Kayis,et al.  The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria , 2010 .

[12]  R. Lal,et al.  Carbon emission from farm operations. , 2004, Environment international.

[13]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[14]  W. Parton,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[16]  Sin-Jin Lin,et al.  Construction method selection for green building projects to improve environmental sustainability by using an MCDM approach , 2013 .

[17]  Yejun Xu,et al.  A consensus reaching model for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information , 2016, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[18]  Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan,et al.  Multi-million construction contractor selection: a comparative study , 2016 .

[19]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Standard and mean deviation methods for linguistic group decision making and their applications , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Dongping Fang,et al.  GHG emission reduction performance of state-of-the-art green buildings: Review of two case studies , 2016 .

[21]  Zhenliang Liao,et al.  Case study on initial allocation of Shanghai carbon emission trading based on Shapley value , 2015 .

[22]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  CO2 emissions of China's commercial and residential buildings: Evidence and reduction policy , 2015 .

[23]  Lei Zhu,et al.  How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? , 2014 .

[24]  Justo Garcia Navarro,et al.  Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact , 2006 .

[25]  Gregg Marland,et al.  CO2 emissions from the production and combustion of fuel ethanol from corn , 1991 .

[26]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Identification of Key Contractor Characteristic Factors That Affect Project Success under Different Project Delivery Systems: Empirical Analysis Based on a Group of Data from China , 2016 .

[28]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Incorporating sustainability into contractor evaluation and team formation in the built environment , 2012 .

[29]  H. W. Hunt,et al.  Management options for reducing CO2 emissions from agricultural soils , 2000 .

[30]  Dong Sun,et al.  Minimizing Energy Consumption of Wheeled Mobile Robots via Optimal Motion Planning , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[31]  Wen-Hsien Tsai,et al.  Incorporating life cycle assessments into building project decision-making: An energy consumption and CO2 emission perspective , 2011 .

[32]  Tengfei Huo,et al.  Key Factors of Project Characteristics Affecting Project Delivery System Decision Making in the Chinese Construction Industry: Case Study Using Chinese Data Based on Rough Set Theory , 2016 .

[33]  Simulation study on dynamic formation mechanism about competitiveness of China's construction industry based on the combination of SEM and SD , 2010 .

[34]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[35]  Jingfeng Yuan,et al.  A special Partial Least Squares (PLS) path decision modeling for bid evaluation of large construction projects , 2017 .

[36]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Key performance indicators for measuring construction success , 2004 .

[37]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Some methods to deal with unacceptable incomplete 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations in group decision making , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[38]  B. Kayis,et al.  Identifying key factors in the evaluation of tenders for projects and services , 2009 .

[39]  K. Lai,et al.  A method used for evaluating bids in the chinese construction industry , 2004 .

[40]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Carbon implications of end-of-life management of building materials. , 2009 .

[41]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Which Owner Characteristics Are Key Factors Affecting Project Delivery System Decision Making? Empirical Analysis Based on the Rough Set Theory , 2015 .

[42]  Michael Riley,et al.  A multi‐criteria approach to contractor selection , 2002 .

[43]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  “Turning green into gold”: a framework for energy performance contracting (EPC) in China's real estate industry , 2015 .

[44]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Optimal consensus models for group decision making under linguistic preference relations , 2016, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[45]  Yejun Xu,et al.  A conflict-eliminating approach for emergency group decision of unconventional incidents , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[46]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  Uncertainty analysis for measuring greenhouse gas emissions in the building construction phase: a case study in China , 2016 .

[47]  Huiyang Xie The Optimization Decision Model of Sub-contractor Selection in Multiple Subproject and Its Solving Method of Genetic Algorithm , 2016 .

[48]  F. Henry Abanda,et al.  PV-TONS: A photovoltaic technology ontology system for the design of PV-systems , 2013, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[49]  WangXueqing,et al.  The decision model of the intuitionistic fuzzy group bid evaluation for urban infrastructure projects considering social costs , 2013 .

[50]  Hassan Hosseini Nasab,et al.  A fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making model for contractor prequalification , 2015, J. Decis. Syst..

[51]  Yejun Xu,et al.  An incomplete multi-granular linguistic model and its application in emergency decision of unconventional outburst incidents , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[52]  Yan Hong-yan The Construction Project Bid Evaluation Based on Gray Relational Model , 2011 .

[53]  X. Yao,et al.  Regional energy efficiency, carbon emission performance and technology gaps in China: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis , 2015 .