Economics, adoption determinants, and impacts of micro-irrigation technologies: empirical results from India

Micro-irrigation technologies are promoted for various reasons in India. Despite the reported significant economic advantages, and the concerted support of the government and NGOs, the current micro-irrigation area in India remains an insignificant proportion of its potential. This paper analyzes: (1) the economics of alternative micro-irrigation technologies, (2) the determinants of adoption, (3) the poverty outreach of the different micro-irrigation systems, and (4) the sustainability implications of micro-irrigation adoption. In line with the findings of other studies, this study indicates that micro-irrigation technologies result in a significant productivity and economic gains. The most important determinants of micro-irrigation adoption include access to groundwater, cropping pattern, availability of cash, and level of education, the social status and poverty status of the farmer. Contrary to the expectations, the majority of the current adopters of low-cost micro-irrigation systems are the better-off farmers. The study indicates that the impact of micro-irrigation systems on the sustainability of groundwater resources depends upon the magnitude of the overall productivity gain following the shift from traditional irrigation method to micro-irrigation system, the pattern of use of the saved water, and the type and potential number of adopters.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[2]  R. Barker,et al.  Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement , 2003 .

[3]  R. Skaggs.  Predicting drip irrigation use and adoption in a desert region , 2001 .

[4]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .

[5]  Upadhyay.  Gender aspects of smallholder irrigation technology: Insights from Nepal Upadhyay, B. 2004 , 2002 .

[6]  R. K. Sivanappan,et al.  Prospects of micro-irrigation in India , 1994 .

[7]  David R. Lee,et al.  Explaining the Adoption and Disadoption of Sustainable Agriculture: The Case of Cover Crops in Northern Honduras* , 2001, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[8]  Ramaswamy Sakthivadivel,et al.  A water-productivity framework for understanding and action , 2003 .

[9]  Shilp Verma,et al.  Pepsee systems: grassroots innovation under groundwater stress , 2004 .

[10]  D. Whittington.  Visions of Nile basin development , 2004 .

[11]  M. Caswell.  The Adoption Of Low-Volume Irrigation Technologies As A Water Conservation Tool , 1989 .

[12]  T. Shah,et al.  Micro-irrigation and the poor: A marketing challenge in smallholder irrigation development , 2002 .

[13]  B. D. Dhawan.  Technological change in Indian irrigated agriculture: a study of water saving methods. , 2002 .

[14]  T. Amemiya.  QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[15]  Manohar P. Sharma,et al.  Microfinance Poverty Assessment Tool , 2003 .

[16]  A. Sarkar,et al.  Financial Viability of Drip-Irrigation System for Sugarcane and Grape Cultivation in Maharashtra , 2002 .

[17]  David Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey , 1985, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[18]  C. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Adoption and Diffusion of Drip Irrigation Technology: An Econometric Analysis , 1993, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[19]  Regassa E. Namara,et al.  Prospects for adopting system of rice intensification in Sri Lanka: a socioeconomic assessment , 2003 .

[20]  Gilbert W. Gillespie,et al.  The Sociology Of Agriculture , 1990 .

[21]  S. Archibald,et al.  Agricultural Production Economics , 1986 .

[22]  D. Adhikari,et al.  A LOW COST DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR SMALL FARMERS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 1 , 1997 .