Evaluation of the Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Different Restorative Materials

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and color stability of different restorative materials. Material and Methods: Glass hybrid (Equia Forte), glass carbomer (GCP Glass Fill), resin modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC), compomer (Dyract XP) and microhybride composite (Filtek Z250) materials are used and 150 disc-shaped specimens were prepared. Specimens randomly divided into Mylar strip, aluminum oxide discs and polishing rubber subgroups. Surface roughness is determined by a Profilometer, baseline and after 48 hours immersion in coffee color measurements are made with a spectrophotometer. Statistical analyses are made with two-way ANOVA, Tamhane’s test and Pearson correlation tests. Results: : The highest Ra values are obtained at Equia Forte (1.21) and GCP Glass Fill (1.14), the lowest at Filtek Z250 (0.24) and Dyract XP (0.27) groups. The lowest Ra values of finishing and polishing systems are obtained at control (0.56) and Sof-Lex (0.56) groups, the highest at OneGloss (1.06). The lowest ∆E value is obtained at GCP Glass Fill (1.41) and the highest at Fuji II LC (5.41) and Equia Forte (5.31) groups. The lowest ∆E value of finishing and polishing systems is obtained at Sof-Lex (3.51) and the highest at OneGloss (4.59) group. Conclusion: Polishing rubbers showed more surface roughness and color change than aluminum oxide discs. But the efficiency of finishing and polishing system depends on the restorative materials too.

[1]  G. Kulekci,et al.  Effect of two different polishing systems on fluoride release, surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of newly developed restorative materials , 2017, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[2]  H. Kemaloğlu,et al.  Can Reduced‐Step Polishers Be as Effective as Multiple‐Step Polishers in Enhancing Surface Smoothness? , 2017, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[3]  A. B. Matos,et al.  Influence of Finishing and Polishing Techniques and Abrasion on Transmittance and Roughness of Composite Resins. , 2016, Operative dentistry.

[4]  F. Schwendicke,et al.  Glass hybrid, but not calcium hydroxide, remineralized artificial residual caries lesions in vitro , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[5]  KL Girish Babu,et al.  Evaluation of Solubility and Microleakage of Glass Carbomer Sealant. , 2015, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[6]  P. Beck,et al.  Color and Gloss of Nano-Filled Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers and Resin Composites. , 2015, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[7]  E. Yildiz,et al.  Color stability and surface roughness of polished anterior restorative materials. , 2015, Dental materials journal.

[8]  Hidekazu Takahashi,et al.  Color difference thresholds in dentistry. , 2015, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[9]  N. Taher,et al.  Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  Ruchi Gupta,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the effect of two finishing and polishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials , 2013, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[11]  G. La Torre,et al.  Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for uncooperative patients according to surface protection treatment. , 2013, Annali di stomatologia.

[12]  E. Yıldız,et al.  Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials , 2013 .

[13]  K. Ginjupalli,et al.  Profilometric study to compare the effectiveness of various finishing and polishing techniques on different restorative glass ionomer cements , 2013 .

[14]  F. Yılmaz,et al.  The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  M. Huysmans,et al.  Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system. , 2011, Operative dentistry.

[17]  L. S. Türkün,et al.  Color changes of dental resin composites before and after polymerization and storage in water. , 2011, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[18]  A. Güler,et al.  EFFECTS OF POLISHING PROCEDURES ON COLOR STABILITY OF COMPOSITE RESINS , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[19]  Z. Ergücü,et al.  Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems. , 2008, Operative dentistry.

[20]  Steven R Jefferies,et al.  Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. , 2007, Dental clinics of North America.

[21]  F. Demarco,et al.  Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[22]  A. Ritter Direct resin-based composites: current recommendations for optimal clinical results. , 2005, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[23]  M F Burrow,et al.  Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[24]  A. Yap,et al.  Effect of prophylaxis regimens on surface roughness of glass ionomer cements. , 2005, Operative dentistry.

[25]  M. Türkün,et al.  Effect of bleaching and repolishing procedures on coffee and tea stain removal from three anterior composite veneering materials. , 2004, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[26]  A. Yap,et al.  Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. , 2004, Operative dentistry.

[27]  A. Yap,et al.  Surface finish of resin-modified and highly viscous glass ionomer cements produced by new one-step systems. , 2004, Operative dentistry.

[28]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Analysis of surface roughness of glass-ionomer cements and compomer. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[29]  M. Giannini,et al.  Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[30]  A. Yap,et al.  Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[31]  G. Rumi,et al.  3-D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[32]  C. Turssi,et al.  Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[33]  M. Toledano,et al.  Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[34]  S. Wei,et al.  Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: a review. , 1999, Australian dental journal.

[35]  N. Ruse What is a "compomer"? , 1999, Journal.

[36]  S R Okubo,et al.  Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[37]  A. Yap,et al.  Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. , 1997, Operative dentistry.

[38]  W. H. Tate,et al.  Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers. , 1996, Operative dentistry.

[39]  J. Meyer,et al.  Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. , 1994, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[40]  C. Canalda,et al.  Surface roughness of finished composite resins. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.