Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry

The organizational literature on emerging industries has emphasized the need for institutional entrepreneurs - actors who give the new activity legitimacy and determine its patterns of behaviour. However, little empirical research has been carried out on the strategies that institutional entrepreneurs employ in order to achieve legitimacy for their activity. In this article, we suggest that an institutional entrepreneur can use the development of measurement tools as a strategy to develop its own legitimacy and power. By looking at a French entrepreneurial company’s development of tools to measure corporate social performance, we analyse how measurement tools influence the legitimacy of an industry and the systemic power within it. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for research into measurement tools in the areas of management or business and society.

[1]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Social Enterprise Series No. 19 -- Misery Loves Companies: Whither Social Initiatives by Business , 2001 .

[2]  Heather A. Haveman,et al.  Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Caveat Emptor: The Construction of Nonprofit Consumer Watchdog Organizations1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[5]  M. Callon.  Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics , 1998 .

[6]  M. Lounsbury.  INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION AND STATUS MOBILITY: THE PROFESSIONALIZATION OF THE FIELD OF FINANCE , 2002 .

[7]  D. Wood,et al.  STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[8]  Jonathon E. Mote,et al.  The laws of the markets , 2000 .

[9]  Monika I. Winn,et al.  The Temporal Dynamics of Institutionalization , 2001 .

[10]  Theodore M. Porter,et al.  Making Things Quantitative , 1994, Science in Context.

[11]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Institutional Sources of Boundary-Spanning Structures: the Establishment of Investor Relations Departments in the Fortune 500 Industrials , 1999 .

[12]  C. Cowton.  Playing by the rules: ethical criteria at an ethical investment fund , 1999 .

[13]  Olivier Boiral,et al.  ISO 9000: Outside the Iron Cage , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[15]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance , 2000 .

[16]  B. Husted.  A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance , 2000 .

[17]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[18]  M. Power.  Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason , 1996 .

[19]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[20]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[21]  Bradley R. Agle,et al.  Ensuring Validity in the Measurement of Corporate Social Performance: Lessons from Corporate United Way and PAC Campaigns , 2001 .

[22]  Barry M. Mitnick.  Commitment, Revelation, and the Testaments of Belief: The Metrics of Measurement of Corporate Social Performance , 2000 .

[23]  Arieh A. Ullmann.  Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .

[24]  R. Sparkes,et al.  Ethical investment: whose ethics, which investment? , 2001 .

[25]  Paul DiMaggio.  Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[26]  Bradley R. Agle,et al.  The Relationship between Social and Financial Performance , 1999 .

[27]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  People and profits? : the search for a link between a company's social and financial performance , 2001 .

[28]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity , 2001 .

[29]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[30]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance , 1999 .

[31]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[32]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[33]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[34]  D. Wood.  Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[35]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory , 1998 .

[36]  Barbara Townley,et al.  FOUCAULT, POWER/KNOWLEDGE, AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[37]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[38]  Herbert Kalthoff,et al.  Figures, writing and calculation thoughts on the representation of economic practices , 2002 .

[39]  B. Carruthers,et al.  Making Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street , 1999 .

[40]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life , 1996 .