A demonstration of the effectiveness of a single aberration correction per optical slice in beam scanned optically sectioning microscopes.

In this paper we report the use of adaptive optics to correct for sample induced aberrations in optical microscopy, crucially comparing individual pixel-by-pixel correction against a single correction for an entire optical section. Sample induced optical aberrations in slices of rat brain tissue were corrected with a deformable membrane mirror. Using axial resolution measurements, we demonstrate that a single aberration correction per optical slice achieves around 80% of the maximum possible improvement compared to individual pixel-by-pixel correction in both confocal and multiphoton microscopy. A single aberration correction per depth, compared to pixel-by-pixel aberration correction, significantly decreases scan times and therefore reduces photobleaching and phototoxic effects enabling more rapid microscopy with active aberration correction. The results confirm that the use of a "look-up" table, based upon sample type and depth, may be the most practical way of implementing adaptive optic aberration correction in beam scanning optical sectioning microscopy.

[1]  Amanda J Wright,et al.  Adaptive optics for deeper imaging of biological samples. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[2]  Amanda J Wright,et al.  Exploration of the optimisation algorithms used in the implementation of adaptive optics in confocal and multiphoton microscopy , 2005, Microscopy research and technique.

[3]  Robert M Zucker,et al.  Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance. , 2001, Methods in molecular biology.

[4]  X. Xie,et al.  Adaptive optics for enhanced signal in CARS microscopy. , 2007, Optics express.

[5]  Martin Booth,et al.  Wave front sensor-less adaptive optics: a model-based approach using sphere packings. , 2006, Optics express.

[6]  Masahiko Watanabe,et al.  Large Projection Neurons in Lamina I of the Rat Spinal Cord That Lack the Neurokinin 1 Receptor Are Densely Innervated by VGLUT2-Containing Axons and Possess GluR4-Containing AMPA Receptors , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  W. Denk,et al.  Adaptive wavefront correction in two-photon microscopy using coherence-gated wavefront sensing , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  T Wilson,et al.  Strategies for the compensation of specimen‐induced spherical aberration in confocal microscopy of skin , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  J. Girkin,et al.  Practical implementation of adaptive optics in multiphoton microscopy. , 2003, Optics express.

[10]  Robert K. Tyson.  Principles of Adaptive Optics , 1991 .

[11]  A. Diaspro.  Confocal and two-photon microscopy : foundations, applications, and advances , 2001 .

[12]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Axial imaging through an aberrating layer of water in confocal microscopy , 1992 .

[13]  G. Mourou,et al.  Smart microscope: an adaptive optics learning system for aberration correction in multiphoton confocal microscopy. , 2000, Optics letters.

[14]  Amanda J Wright,et al.  Evaluation of fitness parameters used in an iterative approach to aberration correction in optical sectioning microscopy. , 2008, Applied optics.

[15]  E W Hansen,et al.  Simple binary optical elements for aberration correction in confocal microscopy. , 1995, Optics letters.

[16]  S. Hell,et al.  Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index , 1993 .

[17]  T. Wilson,et al.  Adaptive aberration correction in a confocal microscope , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.