A Hybrid LDA+gCCA Model for fMRI Data Classification and Visualization

Linear predictive models are applied to functional MRI (fMRI) data to estimate boundaries that predict experimental task states for scans. These boundaries are visualized as statistical parametric maps (SPMs) and range from low to high spatial reproducibility across subjects (e.g., Strother , 2004; LaConte , 2003). Such inter-subject pattern reproducibility is an essential characteristic of interpretable SPMs that generalize across subjects. Therefore, we introduce a flexible hybrid model that optimizes reproducibility by simultaneously enhancing the prediction power and reproducibility. This hybrid model is formed by a weighted summation of the optimization functions of a linear discriminate analysis (LDA) model and a generalized canonical correlation (gCCA) model (Afshin-Pour , 2012). LDA preserves the model's ability to discriminate the fMRI scans of multiple brain states while gCCA finds a linear combination for each subject's scans such that the estimated boundary map is reproducible. The hybrid model is implemented in a split-half resampling framework (Strother , 2010) which provides reproducibility (r) and prediction (p) quality metrics. Then the model was compared with LDA, and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). For simulated fMRI data, the hybrid model outperforms the other two techniques in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, particularly for detecting less predictable but spatially reproducible networks. These techniques were applied to real fMRI data to estimate the maps for two task contrasts. Our results indicate that compared to LDA and GNB, the hybrid model can provide maps with large increases in reproducibility for small reductions in prediction, which are jointly closer to the ideal performance point of (p=1, r=1).

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[2]  Peng Zhao,et al.  On Model Selection Consistency of Lasso , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images , 2004, Machine Learning.

[4]  C. Grady,et al.  The Importance of Being Variable , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Chong-sun Kim Canonical Analysis of Several Sets of Variables , 1973 .

[6]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Effective functional mapping of fMRI data with support‐vector machines , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[7]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[8]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Combining multivariate voxel selection and support vector machines for mapping and classification of fMRI spatial patterns , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  A. E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems , 2000 .

[10]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Entire Regularization Path for the Support Vector Machine , 2004, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Model sparsity and brain pattern interpretation of classification models in neuroimaging , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  Si Wu,et al.  Behavior-Constrained Support Vector Machines for fMRI Data Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[13]  John A. E. Anderson,et al.  A multivariate analysis of age-related differences in default mode and task-positive networks across multiple cognitive domains. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Optimizing the fMRI data-processing pipeline using prediction and reproducibility performance metrics: I. A preliminary group analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  A. Tikhonov On the stability of inverse problems , 1943 .

[16]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Group specific optimisation of fMRI processing steps for child and adult data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  On the Definition of Signal-To-Noise Ratio and Contrast-To-Noise Ratio for fMRI Data , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  John A. Detre,et al.  Support vector machine learning-based fMRI data group analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  P. Robert,et al.  A Unifying Tool for Linear Multivariate Statistical Methods: The RV‐Coefficient , 1976 .

[22]  Jonathan E. Taylor,et al.  Interpretable whole-brain prediction analysis with GraphNet , 2013, NeuroImage.

[23]  Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh,et al.  Enhancing reproducibility of fMRI statistical maps using generalized canonical correlation analysis in NPAIRS framework , 2012, NeuroImage.

[24]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ1 Minimization , 2007, 0711.1612.

[25]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[26]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Implicit reference-based group-wise image registration and its application to structural and functional MRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[27]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Evaluation of spatio-temporal decomposition techniques for group analysis of fMRI resting state data sets , 2014, NeuroImage.

[28]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Sparse logistic regression for whole-brain classification of fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic discrimination analysis: A spatial–temporal SVM , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  The NPAIRS Computational Statistics Framework for Data Analysis in Neuroimaging , 2010, COMPSTAT.

[31]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single‐subject fMRI. I. Standard temporal motion and physiological noise correction methods , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview , 2009, NeuroImage.

[33]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Guillermo A. Cecchi,et al.  Stability and Reproducibility in fMRI Analysis , 2014 .

[35]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  The Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Neuroimaging Experiments: The NPAIRS Data Analysis Framework , 2000, NeuroImage.

[36]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[37]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Support vector machines for temporal classification of block design fMRI data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[38]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Modulation of functional connectivity during the resting state and the motor task , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[40]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The Evaluation of Preprocessing Choices in Single-Subject BOLD fMRI Using NPAIRS Performance Metrics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[41]  V. Haughton,et al.  Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.