On the convergence of data assimilation for the one-dimensional shallow water equations with sparse observations

The shallow water equations (SWE) are a widely used model for the propagation of surface waves on the oceans. In particular, the SWE are used to model the propagation of tsunami waves in the open ocean. We consider the associated data assimilation problem of optimally determining the initial conditions for the one-dimensional SWE in an unbounded domain from a small set of observations of the sea surface height and focus on how the structure of the observation operator affects the convergence of the gradient approach employed to solve the data assimilation problem computationally. In the linear case we prove a theorem that gives sufficient conditions for convergence to the true initial conditions. It asserts that at least two observation points must be used and at least one pair of observation points must be spaced more closely than half the effective minimum wavelength of the energy spectrum of the initial conditions. Our analysis is confirmed by numerical experiments for both the linear and nonlinear SWE data assimilation problems which reveal a relation between the convergence rate of gradient iterations and the number and spacing of the observation points. More specifically, these results show that convergence rates improve with increasing numbers of observation points and that at least three observation points are required for the practically useful results. Better results are obtained for the nonlinear equations provided more than two observation points are used. This paper is a first step in understanding the conditions for observability of the SWE for small numbers of observation points in more physically realistic settings.

[1]  Nicholas K.-R. Kevlahan,et al.  Adaptive wavelet simulation of global ocean dynamics using a new Brinkman volume penalization , 2015 .

[2]  S. McKenna,et al.  Shock Capturing Data Assimilation Algorithm for 1D Shallow Water Equations , 2016 .

[3]  H. Freud Mathematical Control Theory , 2016 .

[4]  Lea Fleischer,et al.  Regularization of Inverse Problems , 1996 .

[5]  Zhiqiang Wang,et al.  Exact boundary observability for nonautonomous quasilinear wave equations , 2009 .

[6]  Takuto Maeda,et al.  Successive estimation of a tsunami wavefield without earthquake source data: A data assimilation approach toward real‐time tsunami forecasting , 2015 .

[7]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[8]  T. Bewley,et al.  A computational framework for the regularization of adjoint analysis in multiscale PDE systems , 2004 .

[9]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[10]  J. Coron Control and Nonlinearity , 2007 .

[11]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability , 2005, Technometrics.

[12]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[13]  Pedro M. A. Miranda,et al.  Tsunami waveform inversion by adjoint methods , 2001 .

[14]  Ionel M. Navon,et al.  Impact of non‐smooth observation operators on variational and sequential data assimilation for a limited‐area shallow‐water equation model , 2012 .

[15]  Ionel M. Navon,et al.  Incomplete observations and control of gravity waves in variational data assimilation , 1992 .

[16]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  Unified Notation for Data Assimilation : Operational, Sequential and Variational , 1997 .

[17]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  POD/DEIM reduced-order strategies for efficient four dimensional variational data assimilation , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  P. García-Navarro,et al.  Calibration of the 1D shallow water equations: a comparison of Monte Carlo and gradient-based optimization methods , 2017 .

[19]  Ionel M. Navon,et al.  Variational Data Assimilation with a Variable Resolution Finite-Element shallow-water Equations Model , 1994 .

[20]  김정기,et al.  Propagation , 1994, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[21]  Alexandre Fortin,et al.  Data Assimilation (4D-VAR) for Shallow-Water Flow: The Case of the Chicoutimi River , 2003 .

[22]  U. Naumann,et al.  Estimation of Data Assimilation Error: A Shallow-Water Model Study , 2014 .

[23]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Optimal Control and Estimation , 1994 .

[24]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Jerzy Zabczyk,et al.  Mathematical control theory - an introduction , 1992, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications.

[26]  A. Maurel,et al.  Determination of the bottom deformation from space- and time-resolved water wave measurements , 2017, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Max Gunzburger,et al.  Perspectives in flow control and optimization , 1987 .

[28]  Vasily Titov,et al.  The Global Reach of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra Tsunami , 2005, Science.

[29]  Enrique Zuazua,et al.  Propagation, Observation, and Control of Waves Approximated by Finite Difference Methods , 2005, SIAM Rev..

[31]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  A New Class of Optimal High-Order Strong-Stability-Preserving Time Discretization Methods , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..