Systems biology meets toxicology

In this issue of the Archives of Toxicology, Hans Westerhoff and colleagues present a comprehensive review on how systems biology tools can be applied to toxicology (Geenen et al. 2012; this issue). For decades, scientists in the field of toxicology have taken advantage of available mathematical models. Typical examples include physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models used to predict in vivo concentrations of xenobiotics and to identify the concentration ranges for in vitro testing that are relevant to the in vivo situation (Jonsson et al. 2001; Mielke et al. 2011; Heise et al. 2012). Moreover, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modelling has been successfully applied to predict, for example, mutagenic or irritating compounds (Lilienblum et al. 2008; Rupp et al. 2010; Dorn et al. 2008; Hengstler et al. 2006). Combinations of classical biostatistics, classification algorithms and modelling have also been applied to predict toxic pathways and patient prognosis from complex OMICS data (Ellinger-Ziegelbauer et al. 2008; Zellmer et al. 2010; Kammers et al. 2011; Hellwig et al. 2010). More recently, spatial-temporal modelling has been introduced to predict how tissues respond to toxic damage and how the damage and repair processes compromise the tissue function (Hohme et al. 2007, 2010). However, with the advent of systems biology, a multitude of novel technologies also became available, and although many are quite promising, none have been sufficiently integrated into toxicological research. Therefore, the editors are happy that Hans Westerhoff and colleagues have contributed a review that can easily be described as a ‘‘Manual of systems biology for Toxicologists’’ (Geenen et al. 2012; this issue). For their focus, they have chosen a topic that is familiar to every toxicologist: glutathione metabolism. When toxic metabolites exceed a threshold where glutathione synthesis cannot compensate, toxicity is a likely end point.. Hans Westerhoff and colleagues use this example to illustrate the currently available systems biology tools and how they can be used to predict critical disruption of the glutathione network. Examples are.

[1]  J. G. Hengstler,et al.  Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH) , 2008, Archives of Toxicology.

[2]  Marc Brulport,et al.  Mathematical modelling of liver regeneration after intoxication with CCl(4). , 2007, Chemico-biological interactions.

[3]  J. Hengstler,et al.  The REACH concept and its impact on toxicological sciences. , 2006, Toxicology.

[4]  Jan G. Hengstler,et al.  A physiologically based toxicokinetic modelling approach to predict relevant concentrations for in vitro testing , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[5]  Jos P. M. Lommerse,et al.  Some molecular descriptors for non-specific chromosomal genotoxicity based on hydrophobic interactions , 2008, Archives of Toxicology.

[6]  H Mielke,et al.  In vitro - in vivo correlation of gene expression alterations induced by liver carcinogens. , 2012, Current medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Frédéric Y. Bois,et al.  Assessing the reliability of PBPK models using data from methyl chloride-exposed, non-conjugating human subjects , 2001, Archives of Toxicology.

[8]  Michel Lang,et al.  Survival models with preclustered gene groups as covariates , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Transcription factors ETF, E2F, and SP‐1 are involved in cytokine‐independent proliferation of murine hepatocytes , 2010, Hepatology.

[10]  H. Westerhoff,et al.  Systems biology tools for toxicology , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.

[11]  H. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer,et al.  Prediction of a carcinogenic potential of rat hepatocarcinogens using toxicogenomics analysis of short-term in vivo studies. , 2008, Mutation research.

[12]  Matthias Hermes,et al.  Prediction and validation of cell alignment along microvessels as order principle to restore tissue architecture in liver regeneration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Bernd Rupp,et al.  Chronic oral LOAEL prediction by using a commercially available computational QSAR tool , 2010, Archives of Toxicology.