Design and Testing of a Prosthetic Foot Prototype With Interchangeable Custom Rotational Springs to Adjust Ankle Stiffness for Evaluating Lower Leg Trajectory Error, an Optimization Metric for Prosthetic Feet

A prosthetic foot prototype intended for evaluating a novel design objective for passive prosthetic feet, the Lower Leg Trajectory Error (LLTE), is presented. This metric enables the optimization of prosthetic feet by modeling the trajectory of the lower leg segment throughout a step for a given prosthetic foot and selecting design variables to minimize the error between this trajectory and target physiological lower leg kinematics. Thus far, previous work on the LLTE has mainly focused on optimizing conceptual foot architectures. To further study this metric, extensive clinical testing on prototypes optimized using this method has to be performed. Initial prototypes replicating the LLTE-optimal designs in previous work were optimized and built, but at 1.3 to 2.1 kg they proved too heavy and bulky to be considered for testing. A new, fully-characterized foot design reducing the weight of the final prototype while enabling ankle stiffness to be varied is presented and optimized for LLTE. The novel merits of this foot are that it can replicate a similar quasi-stiffness and range of motion of a physiological ankle, and be tested with variable ankle stiffnesses to test their effect on LLTE. The foot consists of a rotational ankle joint with interchangeable U-shaped constant stiffness springs ranging from 1.5 Nm/deg to 16 Nm/deg, a rigid structure extending 0.093 m from the ankle-knee axis, and a cantilever beam forefoot with a bending stiffness of 16 Nm2. The prototype was built using machined acetal resin for the rigid structure, custom nylon springs for the ankle, and a nylon beam forefoot. In preliminary * Address all correspondence to this author. testing, this design performed as predicted and its modularity allowed us to rapidly change the springs to vary the ankle stiffness of the foot. Qualitative feedback from preliminary testing showed that this design is ready to be used in larger-scale studies. In future work, extensive clinical studies with testing different ankle stiffnesses will be conducted to validate the optimization method using the LLTE as a design objective. INTRODUCTION Despite many studies comparing different prosthetic feet, multiple literature reviews have reached the same conclusion: there is little understanding of how a passive prosthetic foot design affects the gait of an amputee [1–4]. In previous work by the authors, a novel prosthetic foot design objective was proposed, the Lower Leg Trajectory Error (LLTE) [5]. This metric enables the optimization of prosthetic feet by modeling the trajectory of the lower leg segment throughout a step for a given prosthetic foot and selecting design variables values to minimize the error between this trajectory and target physiological lower leg kinematics. This method was previously used to optimize simple analytical prosthetic foot models including (i) a pinned ankle and metatarsal joint with constant rotational stiffnesses as design variables, and (ii) a pinned ankle joint and cantilever beam forefoot, where rotational ankle stiffness and the forefoot bending stiffness where varied [6]. Thus far, all work regarding LLTE has been purely theoretical. The next step in moving towards using LLTE to Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2017 August 6-9, 2017, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

[1]  A. Dollar,et al.  Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness of the Human Hip in the Stance Phase of Walking , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  Amos G. Winter,et al.  Design and Qualitative Testing of a Prosthetic Foot With Rotational Ankle and Metatarsal Joints to Mimic Physiological Roll-Over Shape , 2015 .

[3]  Amos G. Winter,et al.  Lower Leg Trajectory Error: A novel optimization parameter for designing passive prosthetic feet , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[4]  K. Postema,et al.  Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  Amos G. Winter,et al.  Design and Preliminary Testing of a Prototype for Evaluating Lower Leg Trajectory Error as an Optimization Metric for Prosthetic Feet , 2016 .

[6]  Elliott J. Rouse,et al.  Estimation of Human Ankle Impedance During the Stance Phase of Walking , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Klaas Postema,et al.  A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Eitan Kimmel,et al.  Parameter estimation for a prosthetic ankle , 1995, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Brian J. Hafner,et al.  Clinical Prescription and Use of Prosthetic Foot and Ankle Mechanisms: A Review of the Literature , 2005 .

[11]  Torsten Bumgarner,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .