Using Organizational Philosophy to Create a Self-Sustaining Compensation Plan Without Harming Academic Missions

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

[1]  Nancy Pandhi,et al.  Development and Impact of a Novel Academic Primary Care Compensation Model , 2015, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  E. Akl,et al.  Assessment of faculty productivity in academic departments of medicine in the United States: a national survey , 2014, BMC medical education.

[3]  B. Aliarzadeh,et al.  Family physician satisfaction with two different academic compensation schemes. , 2013, Family medicine.

[4]  P. Davis,et al.  Integration of academic and clinical performance-based faculty compensation plans: a system and its impact on an anaesthesiology department. , 2013, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  E. Akl,et al.  Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review , 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[6]  A. Scott,et al.  The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  R. Holcombe,et al.  Mission-focused, productivity-based model for sustainable support of academic hematology/oncology faculty and divisions. , 2010, Journal of oncology practice.

[8]  B. Mets,et al.  Faculty incentive plans: clinical or academic productivity or both? , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  Ronald D. Miller,et al.  The Impact of Productivity-Based Incentives on Faculty Salary-Based Compensation , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  E. A. Reece,et al.  Adapting industry-style business model to academia in a system of Performance-based Incentive Compensation. , 2008, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.