The Cultural Dynamics of Rewarding Honesty and Punishing Deception

Recent research suggests that individuals reward honesty more than they punish deception. Five experiments showed that different patterns of rewards and punishments emerge for North American and East Asian cultures. Experiment 1 demonstrated that Americans rewarded more than they punished, whereas East Asians rewarded and punished in equivalent amounts. Experiments 2 and 3 revealed that these divergent patterns by culture could be explained by greater social mobility experienced by Americans. Experiments 4 and 5 examined how certain consequences of social mobility, approach—avoidance behavioral motivations and trust and felt obligation, can lead to disparate reward and punishment decisions within the two cultures. Moreover, Experiment 4 revealed that Americans exhibited stronger evaluative reactions toward deception but stronger behavioral intentions toward honesty; East Asians did not exhibit this evaluative—behavioral asymmetry. The cross-cultural implications for understanding rewards and punishments in an increasingly globalized world are discussed.

[1]  R. Friedman,et al.  Chinese and American Arbitrators: Examining the Effects of Attributions and Culture on Award Decisions , 2005 .

[2]  Alan S. Miller,et al.  Order by Accident: The Origins and Consequences of Conformity in Contemporary Japan , 2001 .

[3]  J. Christopher.  Situating Psychological Well-Being: Exploring the Cultural Roots of Its Theory and Research , 1999 .

[4]  Deepak Malhotra,et al.  Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity , 2003 .

[5]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[6]  W. Galston.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[7]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[8]  S. Oishi.  The Psychology of Residential Mobility: Implications for the Self, Social Relationships, and Well-Being , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  E. Higgins,et al.  Value From Regulatory Fit , 2005 .

[10]  K. Vohs,et al.  The Strength Model of Self-Control , 2007, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[11]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Armin Falk,et al.  A Theory of Reciprocity , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[13]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[14]  S. Oishi,et al.  Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. Duffy,et al.  The organization man. , 1994, Time.

[16]  Cynthia S. Wang.  Punishing Deception and Rewarding Honesty , 2007 .

[17]  M. Morris,et al.  Blaming leaders for organizational accidents: Proxy logic in collective- versus individual-agency cultures , 2006 .

[18]  A. Tesser,et al.  Some determinants of gratitude. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  T. Offerman.  Hurting hurts more than helping helps , 2002 .

[20]  C. Chiu,et al.  The cultural effects of job mobility and the belief in a fixed world: evidence from performance forecast. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Stephanie V. Rohdieck,et al.  Who Takes the most Revenge? Individual Differences in Negative Reciprocity Norm Endorsement , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Madan M. Pillutla,et al.  Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers , 1996 .

[23]  N. Roese,et al.  Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Ivy Yee-Man Lau,et al.  Culture as common sense: perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Masaki Yuki,et al.  Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: How cross‐societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the USA , 2009 .

[26]  Yoshimichi Sato,et al.  Trust, cooperation, and market formation in the U.S. and Japan , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion , 2001 .

[28]  D. Cohen.  Cultural variation: considerations and implications. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[30]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  Evolution of norms without metanorms , 1984 .

[31]  A. U.S.,et al.  Culture , Emotion , and Well-being : Good Feelings in Japan and the United States , 2010 .

[32]  Laurie L. Levesque,et al.  Social networks and the psychological contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties, and beliefs regarding employer obligations , 2006 .

[33]  M. Brewer,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Relationship- and Group-Based Trust , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[34]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Bad Drives Psychological Reactions, but Good Propels Behavior , 2009, Psychological science.

[35]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[36]  Motoki Watabe,et al.  Uncertainty, Trust, and Commitment Formation in the United States and Japan1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  M. Yuki,et al.  The “Ripple Effect”: Cultural Differences in Perceptions of the Consequences of Events , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[38]  E. Higgins.  Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[39]  K. Abbink,et al.  The Moonlighting Game An Experimental Study On Reciprocity And Retribution , 2000 .

[40]  James K. Harter,et al.  Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Jordi Brandts,et al.  Truth or Consequences: An Experiment , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[42]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan , 1994 .

[43]  M. Yuki,et al.  Relational Mobility Explains Between- and Within-Culture Differences in Self-Disclosure to Close Friends , 2010, Psychological science.

[44]  Thomas F. Denson,et al.  The Roles of Entitativity and Essentiality in Judgments of Collective Responsibility , 2006 .

[45]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Preferences Versus Strategies as Explanations for Culture-Specific Behavior , 2008, Psychological science.

[46]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[47]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.