Electronic health records and technical assistance to improve quality of primary care: Lessons for regional extension centers.

BACKGROUND In 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act apportioned $643 million for a Health Information Technology Extension Program, which established Regional Extension Centers (RECs) to support the implementation and use of electronic health records (EHRs). PROBLEM Little is known, however, about how RECs should assist in EHR implementation and how they should structure ongoing support. GOALS The purpose of this paper is to describe physicians' experiences with the Primary Care Information Project (PCIP), an REC run by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. STRATEGY We interviewed 17 physicians enrolled in PCIP to understand the role of the EHRon quality of care and their experience with technical assistance from PCIP. RESULTS All physicians stated that they felt that the EHR improved the quality of care they delivered to their patients particularly because it helped them track patients. All the physicians found technical assistance helpful but most wanted ongoing assistance months or years after they adopted the EHR.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  R. Baron,et al.  Quality Improvement with an Electronic Health Record: Achievable, but Not Automatic , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  N. Archer,et al.  A Comparison of Physician Pre-Adoption and Adoption Views on Electronic Health Records in Canadian Medical Practices , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  C. Goldzweig,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. , 2009, Health affairs.

[5]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. , 2011, Health affairs.

[6]  Ashish K. Jha,et al.  Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Sara Rosenbaum,et al.  Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses. , 2010, Health affairs.

[9]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services.  Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. , 2010, Federal register.

[10]  Sarah Hudson Scholle,et al.  Easing the adoption and use of electronic health records in small practices. , 2010, Health affairs.

[11]  L. Casalino,et al.  Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records. , 2013, Health affairs.

[12]  Mark W Friedberg,et al.  Associations Between Structural Capabilities of Primary Care Practices and Performance on Selected Quality Measures , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Steven R Simon,et al.  Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. , 2009, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[14]  Farzad Mostashari,et al.  A tale of two large community electronic health record extension projects. , 2009, Health affairs.

[15]  Paul L Hebert,et al.  Electronic Health Record Components and the Quality of Care , 2008, Medical care.

[16]  V. Bufalino,et al.  Effectiveness of the Electronic Medical Record in Improving the Management of Hypertension , 2002, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[17]  Jon H. Marvel,et al.  Electronic Health Records: Postadoption Physician Satisfaction and Continued Use , 2012, The health care manager.