Irradiation of the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes with an adaptive algorithm.

PURPOSE The simultaneous treatment of pelvic lymph nodes and the prostate in radiotherapy for prostate cancer is complicated by the independent motion of these two target volumes. In this work, the authors study a method to adapt intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans so as to compensate for this motion by adaptively morphing the multileaf collimator apertures and adjusting the segment weights. METHODS The study used CT images, tumor volumes, and normal tissue contours from patients treated in our institution. An IMRT treatment plan was then created using direct aperture optimization to deliver 45 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes and 50 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles. The prostate target volume was then shifted in either the anterior-posterior direction or in the superior-inferior direction. The treatment plan was adapted by adjusting the aperture shapes with or without re-optimizing the segment weighting. The dose to the target volumes was then determined for the adapted plan. RESULTS Without compensation for prostate motion, 1 cm shifts of the prostate resulted in an average decrease of 14% in D-95%. If the isocenter is simply shifted to match the prostate motion, the prostate receives the correct dose but the pelvic lymph nodes are underdosed by 14% ± 6%. The use of adaptive morphing (with or without segment weight optimization) reduces the average change in D-95% to less than 5% for both the pelvic lymph nodes and the prostate. CONCLUSIONS Adaptive morphing with and without segment weight optimization can be used to compensate for the independent motion of the prostate and lymph nodes when combined with daily imaging or other methods to track the prostate motion. This method allows the delivery of the correct dose to both the prostate and lymph nodes with only small changes to the dose delivered to the target volumes.

[1]  Yoshiya Yamada,et al.  Long-term outcome of high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[2]  H. Lindsey Positive long-term outcomes for IMRT in prostate cancer. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  P. Xia,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Targeting Pelvic Lymph Nodes , 2008 .

[5]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  M. Flentje,et al.  Does Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) prevent additional toxicity of treating the pelvic lymph nodes compared to treatment of the prostate only? , 2008, Radiation oncology.

[7]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Mapping of nodal disease in locally advanced prostate cancer: rethinking the clinical target volume for pelvic nodal irradiation based on vascular rather than bony anatomy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. Buatti,et al.  Analysis of interfraction prostate motion using megavoltage cone beam computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Sreeram Narayanan,et al.  An on-line replanning scheme for interfractional variationsa). , 2008, Medical physics.

[10]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Ping Xia,et al.  An algorithm for shifting MLC shapes to adjust for daily prostate movement during concurrent treatment with pelvic lymph nodesa). , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  Eugene Wong,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of daily rigid and nonrigid geometric correction strategies during on-line image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate cancer. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  Ping Xia,et al.  Comparison of three strategies in management of independent movement of the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. , 2010, Medical physics.

[14]  R K Valicenti,et al.  Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.