Birder Specialization Differences in Conservation Involvement, Demographics, and Motivations

Birders represent a significant component of wildlife users, but birders are not a homogeneous group. This study develops a recreation specialization framework for birders in a non-North American setting, and examines how conservation involvement, demographics, and motivations vary among specialization levels. Using questionnaire data from birders in Doi Inthanon National Park, Thailand, three specialization levels--novice, advanced-active, and advanced-experienced - are described. Specialization level was positively, but weakly, related to conservation involvement. Age, income, and percentage male rose with specialization level. Both advanced birder types were less interested in nonbirding activities than novice birders. Advanced-experienced birders were most interested in birding activities. Management and marketing implications are discussed.

[1]  Hobson Bryan,et al.  Recreation Specialization Revisited , 2000 .

[2]  S. Kellert.  Birdwatching in American Society , 1985 .

[3]  H. Bryan.  Leisure Value Systems and Recreational Specialization: The Case of Trout Fishermen , 1977 .

[4]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Does specialization affect behavioral choices and quality judgments among hunters , 1992 .

[5]  Steven R. Martin.  Specialization and differences in setting preferences among wildlife viewers , 1997 .

[6]  D. Duffus,et al.  Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation: a conceptual framework. , 1990 .

[7]  C. McDonald,et al.  Differential effects of past experience, commitment, and lifestyle dimensions on river use specialization. , 1992 .

[8]  D. Scott,et al.  An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavioral involvement, commitment, and future intentions in the context of birdwatching. , 1997 .

[9]  P. Boxall,et al.  Participation in wildlife Conservation by birdwatchers , 1996 .

[10]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  Characterizing the influence of past experience on recreation behavior. , 1984 .

[11]  Larry Beck,et al.  Interpretation for the 21st Century: Fifteen Guiding Principles for Interpreting Nature and Culture , 1997 .

[12]  L. A. Helfrich,et al.  Recreational Specializations and Motivations of Virginia River Anglers , 1988 .

[13]  Jamie S. Cole,et al.  Segmenting participation in wildlife watching: A comparison of casual wildlife watchers and serious birders , 1999 .

[14]  B. McFarlane,et al.  SPECIALIZATION AND MOTIVATIONS OF BIRDWATCHERS , 1994 .

[15]  Randy J. Virden,et al.  Recreation Specialization As an Indicator of Environmental Preference , 1988 .

[16]  R. Ditton,et al.  Recreation Specialization: Re-conceptualization from a Social Worlds Perspective , 1992 .

[17]  G. Hvenegaard.  Ecotourism: a status report and conceptual framework. , 1994 .

[18]  J. Roggenbuck,et al.  Recreation Specialization and Norms of Depreciative Behavior Among Canoeists , 1982 .

[19]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS for Windows : professional statistics, release 5 , 1992 .

[20]  Robert E. Manning,et al.  Studies in outdoor recreation , 1986 .

[21]  B. Bramwell,et al.  Visitor Attitudes to a Policy Instrument for Visitor Funding of Conservation in a Tourist Area , 1996 .

[22]  Deborah L. Kerstetter,et al.  An Exploration of the Specialization Concept within the Context of Heritage Tourism , 2001 .

[23]  P. Boxall,et al.  Human dimensions of Christmas bird counts: implications for nonconsumptive wildlife recreation programs. , 1993 .

[24]  P. Dearden,et al.  Ecotourism versus tourism in a Thai national park , 1998 .