Closing Gaps in Asymptotic Fair Division

We study a resource allocation setting where $m$ discrete items are to be divided among $n$ agents with additive utilities, and the agents' utilities for individual items are drawn at random from a probability distribution. Since common fairness notions like envy-freeness and proportionality cannot always be satisfied in this setting, an important question is when allocations satisfying these notions exist. In this paper, we close several gaps in the line of work on asymptotic fair division. First, we prove that the classical round-robin algorithm is likely to produce an envy-free allocation provided that $m=\Omega(n\log n/\log\log n)$, matching the lower bound from prior work. We then show that a proportional allocation exists with high probability as long as $m\geq n$, while an allocation satisfying envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) is likely to be present for any relation between $m$ and $n$. Finally, we consider a related setting where each agent is assigned exactly one item and the remaining items are left unassigned, and show that the transition from non-existence to existence with respect to envy-free assignments occurs at $m=en$.

[1]  A. B. Kahn,et al.  Topological sorting of large networks , 1962, CACM.

[2]  J. Munkres ALGORITHMS FOR THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSIORTATION tROBLEMS* , 1957 .

[3]  Steven J. Brams,et al.  Fair division - from cake-cutting to dispute resolution , 1998 .

[4]  E. Markakis Approximation Algorithms and Hardness Results for Fair Division with Indivisible Goods , 2017 .

[5]  G. V. Balakin On Random Matrices , 1967 .

[6]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  When Can the Maximin Share Guarantee Be Guaranteed? , 2016, AAAI.

[7]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for Computing Maximin Share Allocations , 2015, ICALP.

[8]  Xin Huang,et al.  Envy-Freeness Up to Any Item with High Nash Welfare: The Virtue of Donating Items , 2019, EC.

[9]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  Asymptotic existence of proportionally fair allocations , 2016, Math. Soc. Sci..

[10]  Lester E. Dubins,et al.  How to Cut a Cake Fairly , 1961 .

[11]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  Multiple birds with one stone: Beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via envy cycle elimination , 2020, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[12]  H. Kuhn The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955 .

[13]  N. Wormald The differential equation method for random graph processes and greedy algorithms , 1999 .

[14]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Maximum Matchings in Sparse Random Graphs , 1981, FOCS 1981.

[15]  Yair Zick,et al.  On Weighted Envy-Freeness in Indivisible Item Allocation , 2020, AAMAS.

[16]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  Approximate maximin shares for groups of agents , 2017, Math. Soc. Sci..

[17]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes , 2019, FAT.

[18]  N. Wormald Differential Equations for Random Processes and Random Graphs , 1995 .

[19]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  Appendix to "Incentives and Stability in Large Two-Sided Matching Markets" , 2009 .

[20]  K. Mehlhorn,et al.  EFX Exists for Three Agents , 2020, EC.

[21]  A. C. Berry The accuracy of the Gaussian approximation to the sum of independent variates , 1941 .

[22]  William Thomson,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Fair Allocation , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

[23]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  On the Number of Almost Envy-Free Allocations , 2020, Discret. Appl. Math..

[24]  Hervé Moulin,et al.  Fair division and collective welfare , 2003 .

[25]  Eric Budish The Combinatorial Assignment Problem: Approximate Competitive Equilibrium from Equal Incomes , 2011, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  H. Moulin,et al.  Random Matching under Dichotomous Preferences , 2004 .

[27]  M. Stephanov,et al.  Random Matrices , 2005, hep-ph/0509286.

[28]  Kurt Mehlhorn,et al.  A Little Charity Guarantees Almost Envy-Freeness , 2019, SODA.

[29]  Erel Segal-Halevi,et al.  Democratic fair allocation of indivisible goods , 2019, Artif. Intell..

[30]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  The Unreasonable Fairness of Maximum Nash Welfare , 2016, EC.

[31]  H. Moulin Fair Division in the Internet Age , 2019, Annual Review of Economics.

[32]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuations , 2020, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[33]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods , 2004, EC '04.

[34]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  Envy-Freeness in House Allocation Problems , 2019, Math. Soc. Sci..

[35]  Warut Suksompong,et al.  Almost envy-freeness in group resource allocation , 2020, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[36]  Pasin Manurangsi,et al.  When Do Envy-Free Allocations Exist? , 2018, AAAI.

[37]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods to Asymmetric Agents , 2017, AAMAS.

[38]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  The Computational Rise and Fall of Fairness , 2014, AAAI.

[39]  Pasin Manurangsi,et al.  Asymptotic existence of fair divisions for groups , 2017, Math. Soc. Sci..

[40]  W. Stromquist How to Cut a Cake Fairly , 1980 .