Adjacent Segment Disease FollowingLumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

Study Design. Retrospective radiographic outcomes analysis. Objective. We had 3 hypotheses: 1) a longer fusion; 2) a more proximal instrumented vertebra, and 3) circumferential fusion versus posterior-only fusion would increase the likelihood of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Summary of Background Data. The literature analyzing risk factors, prevalence, and presentation of patients with ASD is varied and without clear consensus. Methods. A total of 188 patients with minimum 5-year follow-up who had lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation for degenerative disorders were included. Radiographic ASD was defined by: 1) development of spondylolisthesis >4 mm, 2) segmental kyphosis >10°, 3) complete collapse of disc space, or 4) more than 2 grades worsening of Weiner classification. Clinical ASD was defined as 1) symptomatic spinal stenosis, 2) intractable back pain, or 3) subsequent sagittal or coronal imbalance. Results. Radiographic ASD occurred in 42.6% (80 of 188) of patients. Patients with radiographic ASD had worse Oswestry scores (20.3 vs. 12.5; P = 0.001) at ultimate follow-up than those without ASD. Clinical ASD developed in 30.3% (57 of 188) of patients. Clinical ASD manifested as spinal stenosis (n = 47), instability-type back pain (n = 5), and sagittal or coronal imbalance (n = 5). Age at surgery over 50 years and length of fusion were significant risk factors for the development of ASD in the lumbar spine. Fusion to L1–L3 proximally increased the risk of ASD when compared with L4 and L5. Circumferential fusion versus posterior fusion was not a significant factor in the development of ASD. Conclusion. Patients over the age of 50 were at higher risk of developing clinical ASD than those 50 years old or younger. Length of fusion was a significant risk factor in the development of ASD in the lumbar spine. Fusion up to L1–L3 increased the risk of ASD when compared with L4 and L5. Circumferential fusion, as opposed to posterolateral fusion, was not a statistically significant risk factor for the development of ASD.

[1]  D. Weiner,et al.  Does Radiographic Osteoarthritis Correlate with Flexibility of the Lumbar Spine? , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  T. Whitecloud,et al.  Operative treatment of the degenerated segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. , 1994, Spine.

[3]  N. Langrana,et al.  Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. , 1984, Spine.

[4]  Philippe Gillet,et al.  The Fate of the Adjacent Motion Segments After Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[5]  S Etebar,et al.  Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  K. Kumano,et al.  Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.

[7]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  CASEY K. LEE,et al.  Accelerated Degeneration of the Segment Adjacent to a Lumbar Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[9]  J. Schlegel,et al.  Lumbar Motion Segment Pathology Adjacent to Thoracolumbar, Lumbar, and Lumbosacral Fusions , 1996, Spine.

[10]  L. Wiltse,et al.  Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[11]  Long-Term Anatomic and Functional Changes in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Harrington Rod Fusion , 1983, Spine.

[12]  E. Wai,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging 20 Years After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2006, Spine.

[13]  R. Fraser,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Disc Degeneration 10 Years After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 1995, Spine.