Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.

Frontal and lateral oriented profile photographs of 108 healthy young adults (57 men and 51 women) were taken, and a standardized protocol was used to quantitatively describe the depicted craniofacial soft tissue structure, the relationships among facial structures, and head posture relative to the ground. Pictures were taken in two body positions, standing and sitting. The male faces were, on average, wider and longer than the female faces, in both frontal and lateral views, with greater differences in the mouth and chin regions. Both sexes were generally symmetrical. Persons who were asymmetric compensated for their appearance by changing head posture relative to the ground, so that in the frontal plane, the interpupillary axis and the occlusal plane were parallel to the ground. Measurements can be employed in computer graphic reconstructions used in orthognathic, maxillofacial, and plastic surgery. In the standing position, the Frankfurt plane was directed upward and forward, with a mean angle of 13 degrees relative to the ground. In seated subjects, it was more nearly horizontal (5 degrees in the men, 8 degrees in the women). This result confirms the need for a careful reevaluation of standard cephalometric and photographic protocols.

[1]  F. Yogosawa.  Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Facial morphology and malocclusions. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  Michiels Ly,et al.  Nasion true vertical: a proposed method for testing the clinical validity of cephalometric measurements applied to a new cephalometric reference line. , 1990 .

[4]  P. Vig,et al.  Asymmetry of the human facial skeleton. , 1975, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  B Solow,et al.  Head posture and craniofacial morphology. , 1976, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  P M Sinclair,et al.  Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. , 1991, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  S M Shah,et al.  An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  S. Linder-Aronson,et al.  Posture of the head, the hyoid bone, and the tongue in children with and without enlarged tonsils. , 1990, European journal of orthodontics.

[9]  R. Clark,et al.  Reproducibility of natural head position. , 1991, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  B. Solow,et al.  Intra- and interexaminer variability in head posture recorded by dental auxiliaries. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[11]  B. Solow,et al.  Dentoalveolar morphology in relation to craniocervical posture. , 1977, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  S. Matteson,et al.  Associations between the postural orientation of sella-nasion and skeletodental morphology. , 1987, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  S. Kapila,et al.  Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. , 1991, The Angle orthodontist.

[14]  T. L. Woo,et al.  ON THE ASYMMETRY OF THE HUMAN SKULL , 1931 .

[15]  R. N. Singh.  Changes in the soft tissue chin after orthodontic treatment. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  E. Batschelet.  Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[17]  G. Latta,et al.  The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  L. Claman,et al.  Standardized portrait photography for dental patients. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.