Optimizing sleep/wake schedules in space: Sleep during chronic nocturnal sleep restriction with and without diurnal naps

Abstract Effective sleep/wake schedules for space operations must balance severe time constraints with allocating sufficient time for sleep in order to sustain high levels of neurobehavioral performance. Developing such schedules requires knowledge about the relationship between scheduled “time in bed” (TIB) and actual physiological sleep obtained. A ground-based laboratory study in N = 93 healthy adult subjects was conducted to investigate physiological sleep obtained in a range of restricted sleep schedules. Eighteen different conditions with restricted nocturnal anchor sleep, with and without diurnal naps, were examined in a response surface mapping paradigm. Sleep efficiency was found to be a function of total TIB per 24 h regardless of how the sleep was divided among nocturnal anchor sleep and diurnal nap sleep periods. The amounts of sleep stages 1+2 and REM showed more complex relationships with the durations of the anchor and nap sleep periods, while slow-wave sleep was essentially preserved among the different conditions of the experiment. The results of the study indicated that when sleep was chronically restricted, sleep duration was largely unaffected by whether the sleep was placed nocturnally or split between nocturnal anchor sleep periods and daytime naps. Having thus assessed that split-sleep schedules are feasible in terms of obtaining physiological sleep, further research will reveal whether these schedules and the associated variations in the distribution of sleep stages may be advantageous in mitigating neurobehavioral performance impairment in the face of limited time for sleep.

[1]  A. Rechtschaffen,et al.  A manual of standardized terminology, technique and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects , 1968 .

[2]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Sleep-Dependent Learning and Memory Consolidation , 2004, Neuron.

[3]  D. Dinges,et al.  Individual differences in adult human sleep and wakefulness: Leitmotif for a research agenda. , 2005, Sleep.

[4]  R. Kronauer,et al.  Dose-response relationship between sleep duration and human psychomotor vigilance and subjective alertness. , 1999, Sleep.

[5]  Mark C. Jones PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF SLEEP MEDICINE , 1990 .

[6]  J. Horne Why we sleep , 1988 .

[7]  E. Mignot,et al.  Sleeping with the hypothalamus: emerging therapeutic targets for sleep disorders , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  D.G.M. Dijk,et al.  Contribution of the circadian pacemaker and the sleep homeostat to sleep propensity, sleep structure, electroencephalographic slow waves, and sleep spindle activity in humans , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  P. Achermann,et al.  Sleep Homeostasis and Models of Sleep Regulation , 1999 .

[10]  Thomas E. Scammell,et al.  The sleep switch: hypothalamic control of sleep and wakefulness , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  J. Born,et al.  Declarative memory consolidation: mechanisms acting during human sleep. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[12]  M M Mallis,et al.  Circadian rhythms, sleep, and performance in space. , 2005, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  M. Kryger,et al.  Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine , 1989 .

[14]  M. Orne,et al.  The benefits of a nap during prolonged work and wakefulness , 1988 .

[15]  Erik Olofsen,et al.  Mixed-model regression analysis and dealing with interindividual differences. , 2004, Methods in enzymology.

[16]  D. Dinges,et al.  The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. , 2003, Sleep.