Effects of parameter uncertainty on predictions of unsaturated flow

Abstract This study uses first-order first and second moment analysis to evaluate the error in predictions of unsaturated flow models caused by parameter uncertainty, expressed in terms of a mean value for each parameter and an error covariance matrix. These are related to the mean and variance in the model predictions by a first-order Taylor expansion. Two applications of the methodology are presented. The first involves the estimation of parameters and their error covariance matrix from particle size distribution data for a layered field soil. These are used to predict water contents and associated errors for a static retention test and a dynamic drainage experiment. The second case involves parameter estimation using a numerical inversion method from a transient flow experiment for a hypothetical homogeneous soil. Predictions of water contents and their errors for a rainfall-redistribution event using the estimated parameters compare well with predictions corresponding to actual parameters. Uncertainty predictions with the first-order error analysis procedure also agree well with results of a Monte Carlo simulation study.

[1]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Simulation of groundwater flow and mass transport under uncertainty , 1977 .

[2]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers , 1970 .

[3]  James V. Beck,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science , 1977 .

[4]  R. Carsel,et al.  Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[5]  Jack C. Parker,et al.  Estimation of soil hydraulic properties and their uncertainty from particle size distribution data , 1989 .

[6]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty , 1987 .

[7]  Jack C. Parker,et al.  Development and evaluation of closed-form expressions for hysteretic soil hydraulic properties , 1987 .

[8]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow part: 1. Mathematical development , 1981 .

[9]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[10]  Jack F. Paris,et al.  A Physicoempirical Model to Predict the Soil Moisture Characteristic from Particle-Size Distribution and Bulk Density Data 1 , 1981 .

[11]  Lynn W. Gelhar,et al.  Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications , 1986 .

[12]  Carlon S. Land,et al.  Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow From Rock Properties , 1968 .

[13]  M. Th. van Genuchten,et al.  A comparison of numerical solutions of the one-dimensional unsaturated—saturated flow and mass transport equations , 1982 .

[14]  P. Rao,et al.  Estimation of the Spatial Variability of the Soil-Water Flux1 , 1977 .

[15]  Nicholas Kouwen,et al.  Hysteretic effects on net infiltration , 1983 .

[16]  J. Parker,et al.  Analysis of the inverse problem for transient unsaturated flow , 1988 .

[17]  Analysis of mass transport with uncertain physical parameters , 1979 .