Differentiating Stakeholder Theories

Following on from work on stakeholder identification, this paper constructs a typology of stakeholder theories based on the extent to which serving the interests of non-shareholders relative to those of shareholders is accepted as a responsibility of companies. A typology based on the division of stakeholder theories into normative, descriptive, and instrumental is rejected on the grounds that the latter two designations refer to second order theories rather than divisions within stakeholder theory and the first is a designation which, for the purposes of business ethics, applies to all stakeholder theories. The crucial distinction between stockholder and stakeholder theory is argued to be their respective rejection and acceptance of role-specific responsibilities toward non-shareholders that are `ultimate objective fulfilling'. From this starting point, a typology is constructed using a division of stakeholder theories into those which do and do not give priority to the interests of shareholders over those of non-shareholders, do and do not posit perfect duties towards non-shareholders as well as shareholders, do and do not accept accountability to non-shareholders as well as shareholders.

[1]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[2]  R. Atkinson.  Conduct: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy , 1969 .

[3]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[4]  K. Goodpaster.  Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis , 1991, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[5]  J. Boatright.  Ethics and the conduct of business , 1992 .

[6]  George D. Chryssides,et al.  An Introduction to Business Ethics , 1993 .

[7]  Bruce Langtry,et al.  Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[8]  R. Freeman.  The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[9]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[10]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[11]  Geoff Moore,et al.  Tinged shareholder theory: or what’s so special about stakeholders? , 1999 .

[12]  A. Wicks,et al.  Getting Real: Stakeholder Theory, Managerial Practice, and the General Irrelevance of Fiduciary Duties Owed to Shareholders , 1999, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[13]  What's the Good of Ethical Theory? , 1999 .

[14]  J. Kaler.  Discussion: Putting ethical theory in its place , 2000 .

[15]  Ian H Maitland.  Distributive Justice in Firms: Do the Rules of Corporate Governance Matter? , 2001, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[16]  John Hendry,et al.  Missing the Target: Normative Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Governance Debate , 2001, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[17]  John Kaler,et al.  Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder identification , 2002 .

[18]  Eric W. Orts,et al.  The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory , 2002, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[19]  W. Cragg.  Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory , 2002, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[20]  J. Kaler.  Responsibility, accountability and governance , 2002 .