Variation in target and distractor heterogeneity impacts performance in the centroid task.

In a selective centroid task, the participant views a brief cloud of items of different types-some of which are targets, the others distractors-and strives to mouse-click the centroid of the target items, ignoring the distractors. Advantages of the centroid task are that multiple target types can appear in the same display and that influence functions, which estimate the weight of each stimulus type in the cloud on the perceived centroid for each participant, can be obtained easily and efficiently. Here we document the strong, negative impact on performance that results when the participant is instructed to attend to target dots that consist of two or more levels of a single feature dimension, even when those levels differ categorically from those of the distractor dots. The results also show a smaller, but still observable decrement in performance that results when there is heterogeneity in the distractor dots.

[1]  Deborah A. Cronin,et al.  Towards a better understanding of parallel visual processing in human vision: Evidence for exhaustive analysis of visual information. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Michael Felsberg,et al.  Convolutional Features for Correlation Filter Based Visual Tracking , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW).

[3]  George Sperling,et al.  The centroid paradigm: Quantifying feature-based attention in terms of attention filters , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[4]  G. Sperling,et al.  How do the S-, M- and L-cones contribute to motion luminance assessed using minimum motion? , 2013 .

[5]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  Standard errors and confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: Generalizing Loftus and Masson (1994) and avoiding the biases of alternative accounts , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[6]  George Sperling,et al.  Precise attention filters for Weber contrast derived from centroid estimations. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[7]  Songmei Han,et al.  Object attention sharpens the tuning of the perceptual template and interacts with task precision , 2010 .

[8]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[10]  Allen L. Nagy,et al.  Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target , 2005, Vision Research.

[11]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Learning a classification model for segmentation , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[12]  Allen L. Nagy,et al.  Distractor heterogeneity, attention, and color in visual search , 2003, Vision Research.

[13]  J. Friedenberg,et al.  Perception of two-body center of mass , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Z L Lu,et al.  Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Visual localization of the center of mass of compact, asymmetric, two-dimensional shapes. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  M. Moia,et al.  Subcutaneous heparin for deep venous thrombosis. , 1999, Annals of internal medicine.

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of random dot targets , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Sagi,et al.  Isolating Excitatory and Inhibitory Nonlinear Spatial Interactions Involved in Contrast Detection * * Part of this paper was presented at the 17th ECVP conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (September 1994). , 1996, Vision Research.

[20]  W. Cowan,et al.  Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[22]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[23]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[26]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[27]  C Bundesen,et al.  Color segregation and visual search , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  V. Nizet,et al.  OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , 113 ( 34 ) ISSN 0027-8424 , 2016 .

[29]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance , 1983 .