A Theory for Enterprise Coherence Governance

In this chapter, the authors pose a theory for the governance of enterprise coherence. The proposed theory consists of three key ingredients: an Enterprise Coherence-governance Assessment (ECA), an Enterprise Coherence Framework (ECF), and an Enterprise Coherence Governance (ECG) approach. The ECA provides an explicit indication of the degree at which an organisation governs its coherence, while also providing a base to achieve a shared understanding of the level of coherence, and actions needed to improve it. The ECF is a practice-based framework that enables enterprises to make the coherence between key aspects, such as business, finance, culture, IT, etc. explicit. The ECG approach offers the instruments to guard/improve the level of coherence in enterprises during transformations. An important trigger to develop this new theory was the observation that many transformation projects fail. These failures even included projects that used an explicit enterprise architecture to steer the transformation. The theory was developed as part of the GEA (General Enterprise Architecting) research programme, involving twenty client organizations. Based on a survey of the possible causes for the project failures, the requirements for the research programme are identified. In developing the theory on enterprise coherence, the following hypothesis is used as a starting point: the overall performance of an enterprise is positively influenced by a strong coherence among the key aspects of the enterprise, including business processes, organizational culture, product portfolio, human resources, information systems, IT support, etc. The research programme uses a combination of design science-based iterations and case studybased research to develop and iterate the theory for enterprise coherence governance. In this chapter, the authors also discuss one of the conducted (real world) case studies, showing the application of the enterprise coherence theory. Roel Wagter Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands Henderik A. Proper Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands Dirk Witte Logica, The Netherlands DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4518-9.ch004

[1]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1992, IBM Syst. J..

[2]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  Enterprise Architecture: A Strategic Specialism , 2012, 2012 IEEE 14th International Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing.

[3]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  On the Use of GEA at the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment , 2012, 2012 IEEE 14th International Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing.

[4]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  Experience Report: Assessing a Global Financial Services Company on its Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness Using NAOMI , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[5]  T. P. Luken Zijn competenties meetbaar? Dilemma en uitweg bij het werkbaar maken van het competentiebegrip , 2004 .

[6]  Aaldert Hofman,et al.  The Integrated Architecture Framework Explained , 2010 .

[7]  John P. van Gigch,et al.  A Metasystem Approach to Organizational Decision-Making , 1979 .

[8]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[9]  Jan A. P. Hoogervorst,et al.  Enterprise Architecture: Enabling Integration, Agility And Change , 2004, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[10]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  Enterprise Coherence in the Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment , 2012, CAiSE Workshops.

[11]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  Enterprise Coherence Assessment , 2011 .

[12]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information systems development: a problem-solving approach , 1992 .

[13]  R. Slot,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) A method for valuing architecture-based business transformation and measuring the value of solutions architecture , 2010 .

[14]  Ruud Hendrickx,et al.  Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal , 2015 .

[15]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..