Sustained involvement of a frontal–parietal network for spatial response selection with practice of a spatial choice–reaction task

With practice, performance on a task typically becomes faster, more accurate, and less prone to interference from competing tasks. Some theories of this performance change suggest it reflects a qualitative reorganization of the cognitive processing required for successful task performance. Other theories suggest this change in performance reflects a more quantitative change in the amount of processing required to perform the task. Neuroimaging research results provide some support for both of these broad theories. This inconsistency may reflect the complex nature of the effect of practice on cognitive and neural processing. Our current experiment addresses this issue by investigating the effect of practice of a relatively easy perceptual-motor task on the frontal-parietal brain network for a specific cognitive process (viz. spatial response selection). Participants were scanned during three functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions on separate days within 4 days while they performed a relatively easy spatial perceptual-motor task. We found sustained activity with practice in right dorsal prefrontal cortex; and sustained but decreasing activity in bilateral dorsal premotor, left superior parietal, and precuneus cortices, supporting a quantitative decrease in difficulty of response selection with practice. Conversely, we found a qualitative change in activity with practice in left dorsal prefrontal cortex. This brain region is outside the response selection network for this task and showed activity only during novel task performance. These results suggest that practice produces both qualitative and quantitative changes in processing. The particular effect of practice depends on the cognitive process in question.

[1]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[2]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical Analyses of BOLD fMRI Statistics , 1997, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  John R. Anderson Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge Compilation: Mechanisms for the Automatization of Cognitive Skills. , 1980 .

[6]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[7]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus–response compatibility on brain activation , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice. , 1992 .

[9]  E. R. Crossman A THEORY OF THE ACQUISITION OF SPEED-SKILL∗ , 1959 .

[10]  J. Flavell Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .

[11]  M. Hallett,et al.  Frontal and parietal networks for conditional motor learning: a positron emission tomography study. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Petersen,et al.  The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[14]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[15]  Addie Dutta,et al.  Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Dissociable Contributions of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices to Response Selection , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  Carol L. Colby,et al.  Stimulus–Response Incompatibility Activates Cortex Proximate to Three Eye Fields , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  H. Pashler,et al.  Procedural learning. I, Locus of practice effects in speeded choice tasks , 1991 .

[20]  J. Ashe,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus–Response Compatibility on Cortical Motor Activation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[21]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[22]  A. Newell,et al.  An integrated computational model of stimulus-response compatibility and practice , 1988 .

[23]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[24]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Practice‐related functional activation changes in a working memory task , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[25]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[27]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Learning-related neuronal responses in prefrontal cortex studied with functional neuroimaging. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  E Ruthruff,et al.  Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  B Horwitz Functional Interactions in the Brain: Use of Correlations between Regional Metabolic Rates , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[32]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[33]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  R. Passingham,et al.  Neural correlates of visuomotor associations. Spatial rules compared with arbitrary rules. , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[35]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries and individual differences in visual concept learning as measured by functional MRI , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  B. Hommel Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  John D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  J. Duncan Response Selection Errors in Spatial Choice Reaction Tasks , 1977 .

[39]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  A functional MRI study of the influence of practice on component processes of working memory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[40]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[41]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[43]  R. Passingham,et al.  Changes of cortico-striatal effective connectivity during visuomotor learning. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Common Neural Substrates for Response Selection across Modalities and Mapping Paradigms , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  C. Curtis,et al.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[47]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  S-R compatibility and response selection , 1995 .

[48]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Human Prefrontal Cortex Is Not Specific for Working Memory: A Functional MRI Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[49]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural Evidence for Representation-Specific Response Selection , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[51]  J. Desmond,et al.  The neural basis of visual skill learning: an fMRI study of mirror reading. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  H. Pashler,et al.  Procedural Learning : 1 . Locus of Practice Effects in Speeded Choice Tasks , 1991 .

[53]  G. S. Snoddy Learning and stability: a psychophysiological analysis of a case of motor learning with clinical applications. , 1926 .

[54]  A. T. Welford,et al.  Skilled performance : perceptual and motor skills , 1976 .

[55]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.