Comparison of the Palindrome vs. Step‐Tip Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Numerous designs for tunneled hemodialysis catheter have been developed in an effort to improve catheter function and survival. In this prospective randomized controlled study, 97 patients were randomized into the palindrome catheter group (PC, n = 47) and step‐tip catheter group (SC, n = 50). Demographic characteristics were not different between the two groups. The effective blood flow rates at different pump speeds were comparable between the two groups. The recirculation was low within acceptable range in both types of catheter, and hemodialysis adequacy was not different between the two groups. However, when arterial and venous blood lines were reversed, while the recirculation was significantly increased in SC, it was not increased at all in PC. The catheter dysfunction‐free survival rate was significantly higher in PC than in SC (78.9% vs. 54.4% at 2 months, p = 0.008). The overall catheter survival rate was also higher in PC than in SC (90.6% vs. 68.8% at 2 months, p = 0.015). We conclude that both catheters are equally effective on the adequate hemodialysis and low recirculation. However, the PCs have advantages over the SCs in terms of lower catheter dysfunction rate, lower recirculation with reversed blood lines, higher short‐term catheter survival rate.

[1]  T. Vachharajani,et al.  Palindrome Dialysis Catheter with or without Peel-Away Sheath , 2010, Journal of Vascular Access.

[2]  R. Foley,et al.  Hemodialysis access at initiation in the United States, 2005 to 2007: Still “Catheter First” , 2009, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[3]  J. Bui,et al.  A review of evolving dialysis catheter technologies. , 2009, Seminars in interventional radiology.

[4]  Chul-woo Yang,et al.  Status of Initiating Pattern of Hemodialysis: A Multi-center Study , 2009, Journal of Korean medical science.

[5]  S. Ash.  Advances in Tunneled Central Venous Catheters for Dialysis: Design and Performance , 2008, Seminars in dialysis.

[6]  M. Tal,et al.  Selecting optimal hemodialysis catheters: material, design, advanced features, and preferences. , 2008, Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology.

[7]  S. Kakkos,et al.  Effectiveness of a new tunneled catheter in preventing catheter malfunction: a comparative study. , 2008, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[8]  T. Vachharajani,et al.  Retrospective Analysis of Catheter Recirculation in Prevalent Dialysis Patients , 2008, Seminars in dialysis.

[9]  T. Ikizler,et al.  Balancing Fistula First with Catheters Last. , 2007, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[10]  S. Ash.  Fluid Mechanics and Clinical Success of Central Venous Catheters for Dialysis—Answers to Simple but Persisting Problems , 2007, Seminars in dialysis.

[11]  C. Wanner,et al.  EBPG on Vascular Access. , 2007, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[12]  Marcello Tonelli,et al.  Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[13]  T. Greene,et al.  Effect of change in vascular access on patient mortality in hemodialysis patients. , 2006, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[14]  M. Tal.  Comparison of recirculation percentage of the palindrome catheter and standard hemodialysis catheters in a swine model. , 2005, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[15]  Matthew S. Johnson,et al.  Randomized comparison of split tip versus step tip high-flow hemodialysis catheters. , 2002, Kidney international.

[16]  B. Bastani,et al.  Effect of Reversal of Catheter Ports on Recirculation: Comparison of the PermCath with Tesio Twin Catheter , 2002, ASAIO journal.

[17]  B. Lucey,et al.  A prospective study of complications associated with cuffed, tunnelled haemodialysis catheters. , 2001, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[18]  E W Young,et al.  Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients. , 2001, Kidney international.

[19]  A. Tsai,et al.  Morbidity and cost implications of inadequate hemodialysis. , 2001, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[20]  H. Richard,et al.  A randomized, prospective evaluation of the Tesio, Ash split, and Opti-flow hemodialysis catheters. , 2001, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[21]  W. Owen,et al.  Dose of hemodialysis and survival: differences by race and sex. , 1998, JAMA.

[22]  N M Krivitski,et al.  Theory and validation of access flow measurement by dilution technique during hemodialysis. , 1995, Kidney international.

[23]  J. Daugirdas.  Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[24]  Z. Twardowski,et al.  Blood recirculation in intravenous catheters for hemodialysis. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.