Factors determining authors’ willingness to wait for editorial decisions from economic history journals

In this contribution, we measure how long researchers are willing to wait (WTW) for an editorial decision on the acceptance or rejection of a submitted manuscript. This measure serves as a proxy for the expected value of a publication to a researcher in the field of economic, business and financial history. We analyze how this WTW measure varies with the characteristics of the submitting authors themselves. We distinguish the impact of personal characteristics (including age, gender and geographic location) as well as work-related characteristics (including research discipline, affiliation and academic position). To identify the factors determining economic history authors’ WTW for editorial decisions, we use a valuation technique known as stated choice experiments. Our results show that respondents found the standing of the journal to be at least as important as its ISI impact factor. Moreover, we find differences in publication culture between economic and history departments. Overall, researchers’ willingness to wait is influenced to a greater extent by the research discipline in which the respondents are active (history vs. economics), than by their personal characteristics (e.g. the education or the type of Ph.D. they obtained).

[1]  Tony Becher.  The significance of disciplinary differences , 1994 .

[2]  Leo Egghe,et al.  The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[4]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  On the tips of their tongues: authors and their views on scholarly publishing , 2006, Learn. Publ..

[5]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Developing measures for valuing changes in biodiversity: final report , 2004 .

[6]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[8]  Ronan Van Rossem,et al.  Senior onderzoekers aan het woord: resultaten van de 'survey of senior researchers' aan de Vlaamse universiteiten , 2011 .

[9]  Chi-Kim Cheung,et al.  Audience Matters: A Study of How Authors Select Educational Journals , 2008 .

[10]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell , 2008 .

[11]  Alberto Longo,et al.  Basic Statistical Models for Stated Choice Studies , 2007 .

[12]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Internet and the Velocity of Scholarly Journal Publishing , 2002 .

[13]  Kjetil Søreide,et al.  Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission. , 2010, Surgery.

[14]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[15]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  Is scientists' publishing behaviour rewardseeking? , 1992, Scientometrics.

[16]  Peter Weingart,et al.  Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[17]  C. Bijleveld.  Methoden en technieken van onderzoek in de criminologie , 2005 .

[18]  Karen M. Gibler,et al.  Factors Academic Real Estate Authors Consider When Choosing Where to Submit a Manuscript for Publication , 2000 .

[19]  John P. Conley,et al.  The Effects of Publication Lags on Life‐Cycle Research Productivity in Economics , 2011 .

[20]  D. Alter.  PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC , 2016 .

[21]  Carlos B. Amat,et al.  Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting , 2008, Scientometrics.

[22]  Wolfgang G. Stock.  The inflation of impact factors of scientific journals. , 2009, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[23]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Journal Evaluation: Technical and Practical Issues, , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[24]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[25]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[26]  Eric H. J. Spruyt,et al.  Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[27]  Sandra Rousseau,et al.  Green market expansion by reducing information asymmetries: Evidence for labeled organic food products , 2013 .

[28]  P. Thompson,et al.  How to choose the right journal for your manuscript. , 2007, Chest.

[29]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments , 2005 .

[30]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies , 2012 .

[31]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  A Method for Comparing Scholarly Journals as Service Providers to Authors , 2009 .

[32]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Interactions between journal attributes and authors' willingness to wait for editorial decisions , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  H. A. Abt.  ARE PAPERS BY WELLKNOWN ASTRONOMERS ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION MORE READILY THAN OTHER PAPERS , 1987 .

[34]  Linda V. Knight,et al.  Selecting an Appropriate Publication Outlet: A Comprehensive Model of Journal Selection Criteria for Researchers in a Broad Range of Academic Disciplines , 2008 .

[35]  J. Shogren,et al.  Price Information and Bidding Behavior in Repeated Second‐Price Auctions , 1999 .

[36]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint , 2006, Learn. Publ..

[37]  Glenn Ellison.  The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process , 2000 .

[38]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SIMULATED CHOICE OR ALLOCATION EXPERIMENTS IN TRAVEL CHOICE MODELING , 1982 .

[39]  Seung-Jun Kwak,et al.  Valuing energy-saving measures in residential buildings: A choice experiment study , 2010 .

[40]  J. Habbema,et al.  Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening. , 2010, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[41]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? , 2002 .

[42]  Daren Yu,et al.  The universal expression of periodical average publication delay at steady state , 2004, Scientometrics.

[43]  Gabriel Pinski,et al.  Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics , 1976, Inf. Process. Manag..

[44]  Gary Koop,et al.  Modelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland , 2002 .

[45]  D. Hicks.  The Four Literatures of Social Science , 2004 .

[46]  E Frank,et al.  Authors' criteria for selecting journals. , 1994, JAMA.

[47]  Michael D. Gordon.  How Authors Select Journals: A Test of the Reward Maximization Model of Submission Behaviour , 1984 .

[48]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature , 2006, Scientometrics.