Mass Reconstruction of Galaxy-scale Strong Gravitational Lenses Using a Broken Power-law Model
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Massey,et al. Automated galaxy-galaxy strong lens modelling: No lens left behind , 2022, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[2] R. Massey,et al. Systematic Errors Induced by the Elliptical Power-law model in Galaxy–Galaxy Strong Lens Modeling , 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics.
[3] S. Suyu,et al. SHARP – VIII. J 0924+0219 lens mass distribution and time-delay prediction through adaptive-optics imaging , 2021, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[4] S. Birrer. Gravitational Lensing Formalism in a Curved Arc Basis: A Continuous Description of Observables and Degeneracies from the Weak to the Strong Lensing Regime , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.
[5] P. Schechter,et al. What Makes Quadruply Lensed Quasars Quadruple? , 2021, 2102.08470.
[6] R. B. Barreiro,et al. Planck2018 results , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[7] T. Treu,et al. Dark matter haloes of massive elliptical galaxies at z ∼ 0.2 are well described by the Navarro–Frenk–White profile , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[8] J. Frieman,et al. TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles , 2020, 2007.02941.
[9] G. Meylan,et al. H0LiCOW – XI. A weak lensing measurement of the external convergence in the field of the lensed quasar B1608+656 using HST and Subaru deep imaging , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[10] C. Kochanek,et al. Overconstrained models of time delay lenses redux: how the angular tail wags the radial dog , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[11] F. Courbin,et al. TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of $H_0$ from time-delay cosmography , 2019, 1912.08027.
[12] Y. Shu,et al. An Accurate Analytic Mass Model for Lensing Galaxies , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[13] C. Kochanek,et al. Overconstrained gravitational lens models and the Hubble constant , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[14] D. Gerdes,et al. STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408−5354 , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[15] L. Williams,et al. Galaxy-lens determination of H0: constraining density slope in the context of the mass sheet degeneracy , 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.
[16] Stefan Hilbert,et al. H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early- and late-Universe probes , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[17] J. Brownstein,et al. SDSS-IV MaNGA: the inner density slopes of nearby galaxies , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[18] D. Gerdes,et al. Erratum: Is every strong lens model unhappy in its own way? Uniform modelling of a sample of 13 quadruply+ imaged quasars , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[19] R. Nichol,et al. A precise extragalactic test of General Relativity , 2018, Science.
[20] F. Bellagamba,et al. SEAGLE – I. A pipeline for simulating and modelling strong lenses from cosmological hydrodynamic simulations , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[21] A. Sonnenfeld. On the choice of lens density profile in time delay cosmography , 2017, 1710.05925.
[22] L. Simard,et al. Galaxies in the Illustris simulation as seen by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - II. Size-luminosity relations and the deficit of bulge-dominated galaxies in Illustris at low mass , 2017, 1701.08206.
[23] J. Wagner. Generalised model-independent characterisation of strong gravitational lenses I: Theoretical foundations , 2016, 1612.01793.
[24] P. Schneider,et al. The inner structure of early-type galaxies in the Illustris simulation , 2016, 1610.07605.
[25] A. Bolton,et al. THE BOSS EMISSION-LINE LENS SURVEY. IV. SMOOTH LENS MODELS FOR THE BELLS GALLERY SAMPLE , 2016, 1608.08707.
[26] G. Meylan,et al. H0LiCOW - V. New COSMOGRAIL time delays of HE 0435-1223: H0 to 3.8 per cent precision from strong lensing in a flat ΛCDM model , 2016, 1607.01790.
[27] Peter Schneider,et al. Ambiguities in gravitational lens models: the density field from the source position transformation , 2016, 1606.04321.
[28] P. Schneider,et al. Lens galaxies in the Illustris simulation: power-law models and the bias of the Hubble constant from time delays , 2015, 1507.07937.
[29] R. Metcalf,et al. The elliptical power law profile lens , 2015, 1507.01819.
[30] Gregory F. Snyder,et al. The illustris simulation: Public data release , 2015, Astron. Comput..
[31] Shy Genel,et al. The Illustris simulation: the evolving population of black holes across cosmic time , 2014, 1408.6842.
[32] S. White,et al. The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments , 2014, 1407.7040.
[33] V. Springel,et al. Introducing the Illustris Project: the evolution of galaxy populations across cosmic time , 2014, 1405.3749.
[34] V. Springel,et al. Introducing the Illustris Project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe , 2014, 1405.2921.
[35] J. Surdej,et al. Use of the Fourier transform to derive simple expressions for the gravitational lens deflection angle , 2014 .
[36] P. Schneider,et al. Source-position transformation: an approximate invariance in strong gravitational lensing , 2013, 1306.4675.
[37] P. Schneider,et al. Mass-sheet degeneracy, power-law models and external convergence: Impact on the determination of the Hubble constant from gravitational lensing , 2013, 1306.0901.
[38] L. Ho,et al. Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies , 2013, 1308.6483.
[39] S. D. Rijcke,et al. Lensing degeneracies and mass substructure , 2012, 1207.4692.
[40] P. Marshall,et al. Constraining the dark energy equation of state with double‐source plane strong lenses , 2012, 1203.2758.
[41] Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al. emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.
[42] J. Kneib,et al. Cosmological Constraints from Strong Gravitational Lensing in Clusters of Galaxies , 2010, Science.
[43] D. Sluse,et al. Strong Lensing by Galaxies , 2010, 1003.5567.
[44] A. Bolton,et al. Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE SLOAN LENS ACS SURVEY. V. THE FULL ACS STRONG-LENS SAMPLE 1 , 2022 .
[45] Y. Mellier,et al. Comparisons between Isothermal and NFW Mass Profiles for Strong-Lensing Galaxy Clusters , 2008, 0805.1148.
[46] A. Bolton,et al. Superresolving Distant Galaxies with Gravitational Telescopes: Keck Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics and Hubble Space Telescope Imaging of the Lens System SDSS J0737+3216 , 2007, 0710.0637.
[47] Tony O’Hagan. Bayes factors , 2006 .
[48] UCLA,et al. The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. I. A Large Spectroscopically Selected Sample of Massive Early-Type Lens Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0511453.
[49] A. Graham,et al. Density-potential pairs for spherical stellar systems with Sersic light profiles and (optional) power-law cores , 2005, astro-ph/0506192.
[50] Hans-Walter Rix,et al. On the Black Hole Mass-Bulge Mass Relation , 2004, astro-ph/0402376.
[51] J. Holtzman,et al. Structure of Disk-dominated Galaxies. I. Bulge/Disk Parameters, Simulations, and Secular Evolution , 2002, astro-ph/0208404.
[52] F. Durret,et al. Energy, entropy and mass scaling relations for elliptical galaxies. Towards a physical understanding of their photometric properties , 2000, astro-ph/0009474.
[53] A. Potsdam,et al. The influence of central black holes on gravitational lenses , 2000, astro-ph/0007011.
[54] P. Saha. Lensing Degeneracies Revisited , 2000, astro-ph/0006432.
[55] Ralf Bender,et al. A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion , 2000, astro-ph/0006289.
[56] Iaa Spain,et al. The specific entropy of elliptical galaxies: an explanation for profile‐shape distance indicators? , 1999, astro-ph/9905048.
[57] C. Kochanek,et al. Gravitational Lensing by Spiral Galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9705194.
[58] S. White,et al. A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering , 1996, astro-ph/9611107.
[59] A. Kassiola,et al. Elliptic Mass Distributions versus Elliptic Potentials in Gravitational Lenses , 1993 .
[60] I. Shapiro,et al. Degeneracies in parameter estimates for models of gravitational lens systems , 1988 .
[61] I. Shapiro,et al. On model-dependent bounds on H(0) from gravitational images Application of Q0957 + 561A,B , 1985 .
[62] I. Bray. Spheroidal gravitational lenses , 1984 .
[63] D. S. Kellicott. A. A. A. S. , 1896, The Canadian Entomologist.
[64] Peter Schneider,et al. Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro , 2006 .
[65] R. Kantowski,et al. The theory of transparent gravitational lenses. , 1975 .
[66] R W Hockney,et al. Computer Simulation Using Particles , 1966 .