Automated quantification of myocardial tissue characteristics from native T1 mapping using neural networks with uncertainty-based quality-control
暂无分享,去创建一个
Christian F. Baumgartner | E. Konukoglu | M. Sinclair | R. Razavi | A. King | B. Ruijsink | E. Puyol-Antón
[1] D. Levy,et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. , 1998, Circulation.
[2] O. Simonetti,et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.
[3] Hilde van der Togt,et al. Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..
[4] Guido Gerig,et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.
[5] Skipper Seabold,et al. Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python , 2010, SciPy.
[6] Theodore P Abraham,et al. The diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[7] S. K. White,et al. Normal variation of magnetic resonance T1 relaxation times in the human population at 1.5 T using ShMOLLI , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[8] M. Robson,et al. Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and CMR Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology consensus statement , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[9] S. K. White,et al. Identification and Assessment of Anderson-Fabry Disease by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Noncontrast Myocardial T1 Mapping , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.
[10] Stefan Neubauer,et al. Myocardial Tissue Characterization by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2014, Journal of thoracic imaging.
[11] R. Peshock,et al. Fully automated tool to identify the aorta and compute flow using phase‐contrast MRI: Validation and application in a large population based study , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[12] Andreas Greiser,et al. Normal diastolic and systolic myocardial T1 values at 1.5-T MR imaging: correlations and blood normalization. , 2014, Radiology.
[13] Thomas Brox,et al. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.
[14] P. Matthews,et al. UK Biobank’s cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[15] Andrew Zisserman,et al. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.
[16] Eike Nagel,et al. T1 Mapping in Characterizing Myocardial Disease: A Comprehensive Review. , 2016, Circulation research.
[17] Richard B. Thompson,et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[18] Stefan K. Piechnik,et al. Measurement of myocardial native T1 in cardiovascular diseases and norm in 1291 subjects , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[19] P. Kellman,et al. Blood correction reduces variability and gender differences in native myocardial T1 values at 1.5 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance – a derivation/validation approach , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[20] Charles Blundell,et al. Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles , 2016, NIPS.
[21] Amit R. Patel,et al. Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[22] Daniel S. Knight,et al. Diagnosis and assessment of dilated cardiomyopathy: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography , 2017, Echo research and practice.
[23] Alex Kendall,et al. What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision? , 2017, NIPS.
[24] A. Greiser,et al. Blood T1* correction increases accuracy of extracellular volume measurements using 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Comparison of T1 and T1* maps , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[25] Nicholas Zabaras,et al. Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..
[26] M. Markl,et al. Variability of native T1 values: implication for defining regional myocardial changes using MRI , 2018, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[27] U. Reiter,et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping. Part 1: Aspects of acquisition and evaluation. , 2018, European journal of radiology.
[28] Klaus H. Maier-Hein,et al. A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images , 2018, NeurIPS.
[29] Ben Glocker,et al. Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[30] Ben Glocker,et al. Automated quality control in image segmentation: application to the UK Biobank cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study , 2019, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[31] Bishesh Khanal,et al. Confident Head Circumference Measurement from Ultrasound with Real-time Feedback for Sonographers , 2019, MICCAI.
[32] Ender Konukoglu,et al. PHiSeg: Capturing Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation , 2019, MICCAI.
[33] Reza Nezafat,et al. Automated analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial native T1 mapping images using fully convolutional neural networks , 2019, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
[34] Wenjia Bai,et al. Fully Automated, Quality-Controlled Cardiac Analysis From CMR: Validation and Large-Scale Application to Characterize Cardiac Function , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.