Poisson-Boltzmann-Nernst-Planck model.

The Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) model is based on a mean-field approximation of ion interactions and continuum descriptions of concentration and electrostatic potential. It provides qualitative explanation and increasingly quantitative predictions of experimental measurements for the ion transport problems in many areas such as semiconductor devices, nanofluidic systems, and biological systems, despite many limitations. While the PNP model gives a good prediction of the ion transport phenomenon for chemical, physical, and biological systems, the number of equations to be solved and the number of diffusion coefficient profiles to be determined for the calculation directly depend on the number of ion species in the system, since each ion species corresponds to one Nernst-Planck equation and one position-dependent diffusion coefficient profile. In a complex system with multiple ion species, the PNP can be computationally expensive and parameter demanding, as experimental measurements of diffusion coefficient profiles are generally quite limited for most confined regions such as ion channels, nanostructures and nanopores. We propose an alternative model to reduce number of Nernst-Planck equations to be solved in complex chemical and biological systems with multiple ion species by substituting Nernst-Planck equations with Boltzmann distributions of ion concentrations. As such, we solve the coupled Poisson-Boltzmann and Nernst-Planck (PBNP) equations, instead of the PNP equations. The proposed PBNP equations are derived from a total energy functional by using the variational principle. We design a number of computational techniques, including the Dirichlet to Neumann mapping, the matched interface and boundary, and relaxation based iterative procedure, to ensure efficient solution of the proposed PBNP equations. Two protein molecules, cytochrome c551 and Gramicidin A, are employed to validate the proposed model under a wide range of bulk ion concentrations and external voltages. Extensive numerical experiments show that there is an excellent consistency between the results predicted from the present PBNP model and those obtained from the PNP model in terms of the electrostatic potentials, ion concentration profiles, and current-voltage (I-V) curves. The present PBNP model is further validated by a comparison with experimental measurements of I-V curves under various ion bulk concentrations. Numerical experiments indicate that the proposed PBNP model is more efficient than the original PNP model in terms of simulation time.

[1]  W. Im,et al.  Theoretical and computational models of biological ion channels , 2004, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[2]  Guo-Wei Wei,et al.  On the fictitious-domain and interpolation formulations of the matched interface and boundary (MIB) method , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[3]  M. Sanner,et al.  Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[4]  C. D. Cole,et al.  Noncontact dipole effects on channel permeation. I. Experiments with (5F-indole)Trp13 gramicidin A channels. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Shan Zhao,et al.  High order matched interface and boundary method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  Serdar Kuyucak,et al.  Models of permeation in ion channels , 2001 .

[7]  M. Bazant,et al.  Steric effects in the dynamics of electrolytes at large applied voltages. I. Double-layer charging. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  L. Beda Thermal physics , 1994 .

[9]  Duan Chen,et al.  Modeling and simulation of electronic structure, material interface and random doping in nano-electronic devices , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Comparison of the Nernst-Planck model and the Poisson-Boltzmann model for electroosmotic flows in microchannels. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[11]  J. A. Dani,et al.  An introduction to molecular architecture and permeability of ion channels. , 1987, Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry.

[12]  Barry Honig,et al.  Calculating total electrostatic energies with the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation , 1990 .

[13]  Guo-Wei Wei,et al.  Quantum Dynamics in Continuum for Proton Transport I: Basic Formulation. , 2013, Communications in computational physics.

[14]  H. Gummel A self-consistent iterative scheme for one-dimensional steady state transistor calculations , 1964 .

[15]  Weihua Geng,et al.  Treatment of geometric singularities in implicit solvent models. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  Shan Zhao,et al.  High-order FDTD methods via derivative matching for Maxwell's equations with material interfaces , 2004 .

[17]  Weihua Geng,et al.  Treatment of charge singularities in implicit solvent models. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Finite‐difference solution of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation: Complete elimination of self‐energy , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  Zhan Chen,et al.  Differential geometry based solvation model II: Lagrangian formulation , 2011, Journal of mathematical biology.

[20]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Differential geometry based solvation model I: Eulerian formulation , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  Benzhuo Lu,et al.  Solutions to a reduced Poisson-Nernst-Planck system and determination of reaction rates. , 2010, Physica A.

[22]  Benzhuo Lu,et al.  A computational study of ion conductance in the KcsA K(+) channel using a Nernst-Planck model with explicit resident ions. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[24]  Duan Chen,et al.  MIBPB: A software package for electrostatic analysis , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  Robert S. Eisenberg,et al.  Two- and Three-Dimensional Poisson–Nernst–Planck Simulations of Current Flow Through Gramicidin A , 2002, J. Sci. Comput..

[26]  D. Levitt Interpretation of biological ion channel flux data--reaction-rate versus continuum theory. , 1986, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[27]  F. G. Ball,et al.  Stochastic models for ion channels: introduction and bibliography. , 1992, Mathematical biosciences.

[28]  Jongyoon Han,et al.  Molecular sieving using nanofilters: past, present and future. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[29]  G. R. Smith,et al.  Simulation approaches to ion channel structure–function relationships , 2001, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[30]  I-Liang Chern,et al.  Accurate Evaluation of Electrostatics for Macromolecules in Solution , 2003 .

[31]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  Federico Fogolari,et al.  On the variational approach to Poisson–Boltzmann free energies , 1997 .

[33]  M. Kurnikova,et al.  Three-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory studies: influence of membrane electrostatics on gramicidin A channel conductance. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[34]  G. Wei Differential Geometry Based Multiscale Models , 2010, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[35]  Serdar Kuyucak,et al.  Recent advances in ion channel research. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[36]  B. Hille Ionic channels of excitable membranes , 2001 .

[37]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[38]  Robert S. Eisenberg,et al.  Coupling Poisson–Nernst–Planck and density functional theory to calculate ion flux , 2002 .

[39]  Guo-Wei Wei,et al.  Matched interface and boundary (MIB) method for elliptic problems with sharp-edged interfaces , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[40]  George C Schatz,et al.  Incorporation of inhomogeneous ion diffusion coefficients into kinetic lattice grand canonical monte carlo simulations and application to ion current calculations in a simple model ion channel. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[41]  Sining Yu,et al.  Three-dimensional matched interface and boundary (MIB) method for treating geometric singularities , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[42]  H. Park,et al.  Electroosmotic flow driven by oscillating zeta potentials: Comparison of the Poisson–Boltzmann model, the Debye–Hückel model and the Nernst–Planck model , 2009 .

[43]  Shin-Ho Chung,et al.  Dielectric self-energy in Poisson-Boltzmann and Poisson-Nernst-Planck models of ion channels. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[44]  D. Levitt,et al.  Modeling of Ion Channels , 1999, The Journal of general physiology.

[45]  Qiong Zheng,et al.  Second-order Poisson-Nernst-Planck solver for ion transport , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[46]  Sung Jae Kim,et al.  Direct seawater desalination by ion concentration polarization. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[47]  M. Bazant,et al.  Steric effects in the dynamics of electrolytes at large applied voltages. II. Modified Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.