Morphological characterization of microspheres, films and implants prepared from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and ABA triblock copolymers: is the erosion controlled by degradation, swelling or diffusion?

Erosion of biodegradable parenteral delivery systems (PDS) based on ABA copolymers consisting of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) A-blocks attached to polyethylene oxide (PEO) B-blocks, or PLGA is important for the release of macromolecular drugs. The degradation behavior of four types of PDS, namely extruded rods, tablets, films and microspheres, was studied with respect to molecular weight, mass, polymer composition and shape and microstructure of the PDS. For each device the onset time of bulk erosion (t(on)) and the apparent rate of mass loss (k(app)) were calculated. In the case of PLGA, the t(on) was 16.2 days for microspheres, 19.2 days for films and 30.1 days for cylindrical implants and tablets. The k(app) was 0.04 days(-1) for microspheres, 0.09 days(-1) for films, 0.11 days(-1) for implants and 0.10 days(-1) for tablets. The degradation rates were in the same range irrespective of the geometry and the micrographs of eroding PDS demonstrated pore formation; therefore, a complex pore diffusion mechanism seems to control the erosion of PLGA devices. In contrast, PDS based on ABA copolymers showed swelling, followed by a parallel process of molecular weight degradation and polymer erosion, independent of the geometry. The contact angles of ABA films increased either with decreasing PEO content or with increasing chain length of the PEO B-blocks. In summary, the insertion of a hydrophilic B-block leads to an erosion controlled by degradation of ABA copolymers, whereas for PLGA a complex pore diffusion of degradation products controls the rate of bulk erosion.

[1]  M. Lück,et al.  Plasma protein adsorption on biodegradable microspheres consisting of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(L-lactide) or ABA triblock copolymers containing poly(oxyethylene). Influence of production method and polymer composition. , 1998, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[2]  T. Kissel,et al.  Synthesis and properties of biodegradable ABA triblock copolymers consisting of poly(l-lactic acid) or poly (l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) A-blocks attached to central poly ( oxyethylene ) B-blocks , 1993 .

[3]  Donald E. Chickering,et al.  Morphological characterization of bioerodible polymers. 3. Characterization of the erosion and intact zones in polyanhydrides using scanning electron microscopy , 1993 .

[4]  T. Kissel,et al.  In-vitro degradation and bovine serum albumin release of the ABA triblock copolymers consisting of poly (L(+) lactic acid), or poly(L(+) lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) A-blocks attached to central polyoxyethylene B-blocks , 1994 .

[5]  T. Kissel,et al.  The degradation, swelling and erosion properties of biodegradable implants prepared by extrusion or compression moulding of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and ABA triblock copolymers. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[6]  R Langer,et al.  Erosion kinetics of hydrolytically degradable polymers. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  R. Arshady Preparation of biodegradable microspheres and microcapsules: 2. Polyactides and related polyesters , 1991 .

[8]  J. Kreuter,et al.  Contact angles of surfactants with a potential to alter the body distribution of colloidal drug carriers on poly(methyl methacrylate) surfaces , 1988 .

[9]  D. Crommelin,et al.  Controlled release of bioactive agents from lactide/glycolide polymers , 1990 .

[10]  C. G. Pitt,et al.  Poly (glycolic acid-co-dl-lactic acid): diffusion or degradation controlled drug delivery? , 1992 .

[11]  Jean-Pierre Benoit,et al.  Bovine serum albumin release from poly(α-hydroxy acid) microspheres: effects of polymer molecular weight and surface properties , 1997 .

[12]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Effect of in vivo and in vitro degradation on molecular and mechanical properties of various low-molecular-weight polylactides. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  E. Doelker,et al.  Residual solvents in pharmaceutical products: acceptable limits, influences on physicochemical properties, analytical methods and documented values , 1997 .

[14]  Stephen E. Harding,et al.  Polylactide−Poly(ethylene glycol) Copolymers as Drug Delivery Systems. 1. Characterization of Water Dispersible Micelle-Forming Systems , 1996 .

[15]  M. Davies,et al.  Microencapsulation using emulsification/solvent evaporation: an overview of techniques and applications. , 1990, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.

[16]  S. Li,et al.  Further investigations on the hydrolytic degradation of poly (DL-lactide). , 1999, Biomaterials.

[17]  T. Kissel,et al.  Degradation and protein release properties of microspheres prepared from biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and ABA triblock copolymers: influence of buffer media on polymer erosion and bovine serum albumin release. , 1999, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[18]  A. Goepferich,et al.  An Approach to Classify Degradable Polymers , 1998 .

[19]  R. Linhardt,et al.  Degradation of poly(ester) microspheres. , 1990, Biomaterials.

[20]  Suming Li,et al.  Hydrolytic degradation of devices based on poly(DL-lactic acid) size-dependence. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[21]  M. Davies,et al.  XPS and SSIMS Analysis Revealing Surface Segregation and Short-Range Order in Solid Films of Block Copolymers of PEO and PLGA , 1997 .

[22]  R. Kenley,et al.  Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) decomposition kinetics in vivo and in vitro , 1987 .

[23]  A. Göpferich,et al.  Polymer Bulk Erosion , 1997 .

[24]  David R. Pichora,et al.  A mechanistic study of antibiotic release from biodegradable poly(d,1-lactide) cylinders , 1994 .

[25]  T. Kissel,et al.  Parenteral protein delivery systems using biodegradable polyesters of ABA block structure, containing hydrophobic poly(lactide-co-glycolide) A blocks and hydrophilic poly(ethylene oxide) B blocks , 1996 .