Scientific realism: what it is, the contemporary debate, and new directions

First, I answer the controversial question ’What is scientific realism?’ with extensive reference to the varied accounts of the position in the literature. Second, I provide an overview of the key developments in the debate concerning scientific realism over the past decade. Third, I provide a summary of the other contributions to this special issue.

[1]  Fabio Sterpetti,et al.  Scientific Realism, the Semantic View and Evolutionary Biology , 2016 .

[2]  Anjan Chakravartty Scientific Realism and Ontological Relativity , 2011 .

[3]  M. Nye Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism ‐ by Hasok Chang , 2013 .

[4]  Stathis Psillos,et al.  The present state of the scientific realism debate , 2000, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[5]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  Extending the argument from unconceived alternatives: observations, models, predictions, explanations, methods, instruments, experiments, and values , 2019, Synthese.

[6]  Stephen Leeds,et al.  Constructive empiricism , 2005, Synthese.

[7]  Gideon Rosen,et al.  What is constructive empiricism? , 1994 .

[8]  Donnchadh O’Conaill Ontic Structural Realism and Concrete Objects , 2014 .

[9]  G. Cevolani,et al.  Progress as Approximation to the Truth: A Defence of the Verisimilitudinarian Approach , 2013 .

[10]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  Scientific progress without increasing verisimilitude: In response to Niiniluoto. , 2015, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[11]  Stephan Hartmann,et al.  The no miracles argument without the base rate fallacy , 2016, Synthese.

[12]  E. Board,et al.  LVIII. On the Masses of the Ions in Gases at Low Pressures , 1997 .

[13]  Stathis Psillos,et al.  Living with the abstract: realism and models , 2011, Synthese.

[14]  Ilkka Niiniluoto,et al.  Optimistic realism about scientific progress , 2017, Synthese.

[15]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  Approximations, idealizations and 'experiments' at the physics-biology interface. , 2011, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[16]  Mark Newman,et al.  Beyond Structural Realism: pluralist criteria for theory evaluation , 2010, Synthese.

[17]  Steven French,et al.  Shifting to structures in physics and biology: a prophylactic for promiscuous realism. , 2011, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[18]  S. Psillos Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth , 1999 .

[19]  P. Stanford Catastrophism, Uniformitarianism, and a Scientific Realism Debate That Makes a Difference , 2015, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  M. Egg Expanding Our Grasp: Causal Knowledge and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives , 2016, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[21]  Darrell P. Rowbottom Popper's Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation , 2010 .

[22]  Richard N. Boyd On the current status of the issue of scientific realism , 1983 .

[23]  P. Forrest Why Most of us Should be Scientific Realists: A Reply to Van Fraassen , 1994 .

[24]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science: a resolution at the group level , 2011 .

[25]  T. Lyons Toward a Purely Axiological Scientific Realism , 2005 .

[26]  Moti Mizrahi,et al.  What is Scientific Progress? Lessons from Scientific Practice , 2013 .

[27]  Peter Vickers,et al.  Towards a realistic success-to-truth inference for scientific realism , 2019, Synthese.

[28]  L. Laudan A Confutation of Convergent Realism , 1981, Philosophy of Science.

[29]  Christian Wüthrich,et al.  No Categorial Support for Radical Ontic Structural Realism , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[30]  Peter Vickers,et al.  A Confrontation of Convergent Realism , 2013, Philosophy of Science.

[31]  Catherine Z. Elgin Nominalism, realism and objectivity , 2016, Synthese.

[32]  G. Belot Down to Earth Underdetermination , 2015 .

[33]  Darrell P. Rowbottom Aimless science , 2013, Synthese.

[34]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  The Instrumentalist’s New Clothes , 2011, Philosophy of Science.

[35]  Bence Nanay,et al.  Entity realism and singularist semirealism , 2016, Synthese.

[36]  Johanna Wolff Naturalistic quietism or scientific realism? , 2015, Synthese.

[37]  P. Magnus,et al.  Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy* , 2004, Philosophy of Science.

[38]  Greg Frost-Arnold Should a historically motivated anti-realist be a Stanfordite? , 2016, Synthese.

[39]  Darrell P. Rowbottom Information versus knowledge in confirmation theory , 2014 .

[40]  Samuel Ruhmkorff Global and Local Pessimistic Meta-inductions , 2013 .

[41]  H. Nagaoka LV. Kinetics of a system of particles illustrating the line and the band spectrum and the phenomena of radioactivity , 1904 .

[42]  Milena Ivanova Conventionalism about what? Where Duhem and Poincaré part ways. , 2015, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[43]  S. Freytag Image And Logic A Material Culture Of Microphysics , 2016 .

[44]  Greg Frost-Arnold Can the Pessimistic Induction be Saved from Semantic Anti-Realism about Scientific Theory? , 2014, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[45]  R. Clausius On the relation of the work performed by diffusion to the second proposition of the mechanical theory of heat , 1878 .

[46]  Alexander J Bird,et al.  What Is Scientific Progress , 2007 .

[47]  P. Kyle Stanford,et al.  Exceeding Our Grasp , 2006 .

[48]  Milena Ivanova Conventionalism, structuralism and neo-Kantianism in Poincaré's philosophy of science , 2015 .

[49]  H. Poincaré Science and Hypothesis , 1906 .

[50]  U. Mäki Reglobalizing Realism by Going Local, or (How) Should Our Formulations of Scientific Realism be Informed about the Sciences? , 2005 .

[51]  Bryan W. Roberts,et al.  Group Structural Realism , 2011, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[52]  Darrell P. Rowbottom N-rays and the semantic view of scientific progress , 2008 .

[53]  Michael Devitt,et al.  Are Unconceived Alternatives a Problem for Scientific Realism? , 2011 .

[54]  J. Mearsheimer Structural Realism , 2006 .

[55]  P. Kyle Stanford,et al.  Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously? , 2001, Philosophy of Science.

[56]  M. Esfeld,et al.  The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1957, Nature.

[57]  D. Rickles,et al.  Structural Realism: Structure, Object, and Causality , 2012 .

[58]  Moti Mizrahi Historical Inductions: New Cherries, Same Old Cherry-picking , 2015 .

[59]  O. Bueno,et al.  Structural realism and the nature of structure , 2015 .

[60]  Darrell P. Rowbottom What Scientific Progress Is Not: Against Bird’s Epistemic View , 2010 .

[61]  John Divers,et al.  Realism and Truth. , 1995 .

[62]  Van Fraassen,et al.  The Agnostic Subtly Probabilified , 1998 .

[63]  Kerry McKenzie Priority and Particle Physics: Ontic Structural Realism as a Fundamentality Thesis , 2014, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[64]  S. French The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation , 2014 .

[65]  K. B. Wray,et al.  Method and Continuity in Science , 2016 .

[66]  Ioannis Votsis Perception and observation unladened , 2015 .

[67]  K. Brad Wray Discarded theories: the role of changing interests , 2016, Synthese.

[68]  Jonathan Bain,et al.  Category-theoretic structure and radical ontic structural realism , 2013, Synthese.

[69]  M. Suárez Scientific Realism, the Galilean Strategy, and Representation , 2011 .

[70]  Juha Saatsi,et al.  What is theoretical progress of science? , 2019, Synthese.

[71]  Greg Frost-Arnold The No‐Miracles Argument for Realism: Inference to an Unacceptable Explanation* , 2010, Philosophy of Science.

[72]  K. Popper Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[73]  Bence Nanay Singularist Semirealism , 2013, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[74]  Anjan Chakravartty,et al.  A metaphysics for scientific realism , 2007 .

[75]  Jamin Asay,et al.  Going local: a defense of methodological localism about scientific realism , 2019, Synthese.

[76]  R. Frigg,et al.  Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask , 2011 .

[77]  Juha Saatsi,et al.  Historical inductions, Old and New , 2019, Synthese.

[78]  Ilkka Niiniluoto,et al.  Scientific progress , 2005, Synthese.

[79]  R. Smithson Newman’s Objection and the No Miracles Argument , 2017 .

[80]  R. Hendry Realism, history and the quantum theory: Philosophical and historical arguments for realism as a methodological thesis. , 1996 .

[81]  II The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research , 2022 .

[82]  Michael Weisberg,et al.  Biology and Philosophy symposium on Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World , 2013 .

[83]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  Evolutionary Epistemology and the Aim of Science , 2010 .

[85]  Darrell P. Rowbottom Which methodologies of science are consistent with scientific realism , 2002 .

[86]  Leah Henderson The no miracles argument and the base rate fallacy , 2015, Synthese.

[87]  Karl Raimund Sir Popper,et al.  Realism and the aim of science , 1983 .

[88]  K. B. Wray,et al.  The methodological defense of realism scrutinized. , 2015, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[89]  J. Sprenger The probabilistic no miracles argument , 2015, European journal for philosophy of science.

[90]  George Dickie,et al.  Philosophy and Scientific Realism. , 1965 .

[91]  Paul M. Churchland,et al.  Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind: Sentential epistemologies and the natural science of epistemic engines , 1979 .

[92]  K. C. K. D.Sc.,et al.  LV. On the acoustics of strings struck by a hard hammer , 1928 .

[93]  A. Musgrave,et al.  The Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism , 1988 .

[94]  C. Sartwell Why Knowledge Is Merely True Belief , 1992 .

[95]  Majid Davoody Beni,et al.  Reconstructing the upward path to structural realism , 2017 .

[96]  A. Bird Scientific progress as accumulation of knowledge: a reply to Rowbottom , 2008 .

[97]  Penelope Maddy,et al.  Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method , 2007 .

[98]  J. Ladyman What is Structural Realism , 1998 .

[99]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  Gideon Rosen on constructive empiricism , 1994 .

[100]  Florian Müller The Pessimistic Meta-induction: Obsolete Through Scientific Progress? , 2015 .

[101]  Ludwig Fahrbach,et al.  How the growth of science ends theory change , 2011, Synthese.

[102]  Ilkka Niiniluoto,et al.  Scientific progress as increasing verisimilitude. , 2014, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[103]  P. Galison Refections on Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics , 1999, Perspectives on Science.

[104]  P. Stanford Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives , 2006 .

[105]  W. W. Bartley The Retreat to Commitment , 1984 .

[106]  John Dupré,et al.  Human nature and the limits of science , 2001 .

[107]  C. Howson Hume's problem: induction and the justification of belief , 2000 .

[108]  Axel Gelfert How to Do Science with Models: A Philosophical Primer , 2015 .

[109]  Moti Mizrahi The Argument from Underconsideration and Relative Realism , 2013 .

[110]  Bas C. Van fraassen Constructive Empiricism Now , 2001 .

[111]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[112]  Jay Odenbaugh,et al.  True Lies: Realism, Robustness, and Models , 2011, Philosophy of Science.

[113]  A. Nounou For or against structural realism? A verdict from high energy physics , 2015 .

[114]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science, part II : how to strike the balance , 2013 .

[115]  Johanna Wolff,et al.  Do Objects Depend on Structures? , 2012, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[116]  K. Brad Wray,et al.  Pessimistic Inductions: Four Varieties , 2015 .

[118]  Stephan Hartmann,et al.  Understanding (with) Toy Models , 2018, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[119]  K. Brad Wray The pessimistic induction and the exponential growth of science reassessed , 2013, Synthese.

[120]  P. M. Ainsworth What is ontic structural realism , 2010 .

[121]  Finnur Dellsén,et al.  Realism and the absence of rivals , 2017, Synthese.

[122]  Finnur Dellsén Scientific progress: Knowledge versus understanding. , 2016, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[123]  Peter J. Lewis,et al.  Why The Pessimistic Induction Is A Fallacy , 2001, Synthese.

[124]  Ian Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science , 1983 .

[125]  S. Hartmann,et al.  The No Alternatives Argument , 2015, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.