Visual Stimulus Background Effects on SSVEP-Based BCI Towards a Practical Robot Car Control

Flickering source is an indispensable component in steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs)-based brain–computer interface (BCI), and its background severely influences the potentials evoked by the repetitive stimuli. In this paper, we investigated the problem under three different backgrounds in the context of the SSVEP-BCI-based robot car control, including black screen, static scene and dynamic scene of the environment. In the ten subjects experiment, we found significant decrease in SSVEP amplitude in dynamic scene condition compared to the reference condition black screen (p < 0.05), which resulted in classification accuracy decrease as evaluated by 10-fold cross validation. However, our proposed experiment paradigm has shown that training with static scene or dynamic scene condition could well compensate this performance drop and improve the online robot car control with real-time video feedback. The addressed problem in our application would provide some valuable suggestions when translating the SSVEP-BCI from laboratory exploration into practical usages.

[1]  A. Snyder,et al.  The Stiles-Crawford effect--explanation and consequences. , 1973, Vision research.

[2]  Arun Khosla,et al.  Influence of stimuli colour in SSVEP-based BCI wheelchair control using support vector machines , 2014, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[3]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[4]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A P300 event-related potential brain–computer interface (BCI): The effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[5]  John R. Smith,et al.  Steady-State VEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface Control in an Immersive 3D Gaming Environment , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[6]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Visual Evoked Potentials , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[7]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  A Self-Paced and Calibration-Less SSVEP-Based Brain–Computer Interface Speller , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A BCI-based environmental controller for the motion-disabled , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Simultaneous EEG and fMRI of the alpha rhythm , 2002, Neuroreport.

[11]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  C. Herrmann.  Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design and implementation of a brain-computer interface with high transfer rates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[15]  Chia-Wei Sun,et al.  An SSVEP-Actuated Brain Computer Interface Using Phase-Tagged Flickering Sequences: A Cursor System , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[18]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[19]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  Effect of competing stimuli on SSVEP-based BCI , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  D. Regan,et al.  An Effect of Stimulus Colour on Average Steady-state Potentials evoked in Man , 1966, Nature.

[21]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional ‘eye’ rivalry and interocular ‘percept’ rivalry , 2009, Brain Research.

[22]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[23]  Lin Yao,et al.  Effect of duty cycle in different frequency domains on SSVEP based BCI: A preliminary study , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  A practical VEP-based brain-computer interface. , 2006, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  Christian Mandel,et al.  Navigating a smart wheelchair with a brain-computer interface interpreting steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.