Phase transitions in nanoconfined fluids: The evidence from simulation and theory

N anoconfined fluids — that is, fluids confined between surfaces separated by nanometers — play important roles in many natural and man-made processes and products. One example is hard disk drive lubrication where, as data density has increased exponentially, the distance between the read head and rotating platen has been exponentially decreasing for several decades. This distance is now at 10–12 nm, and in the next generation of disk drives will be at 8 nm; currently, monolayers of lubricant are used to protect disk drives in abnormal situations (e.g., power loss), but in the future it is expected that they will be lubricated at all times, including during read/write operations. Additional examples include the lubrication of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), and nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS), and a model for the natural lubrication of synovial joints, all of which can involve moving surfaces separated by distances of the order of nm. The latter exhibit very low-sliding friction at normal pressures up to 5 MPa or more; the model system, consisting of polyzwitterionic brushes polymerized directly onto the mica sheets in a surface force balance (SFB), exhibits very similar low-sliding friction (within a factor of 2 of the natural synovial joints) at pressures as high as 7.55 MPa. These three examples highlight the desirability of being able to lubricate effectively between surfaces moving relative to each other while separated by distances on the order of nm. If the lubricant undergoes a fluid-solid phase transition under nanoconfinement, resulting in a many order of magnitude increase in the effective viscosity and the onset of a nonzero yield stress, then it is clearly not useful as a lubricant. In addition to lubrication at the nanoscale, phase transitions under nanoconfinement are also clearly important in industrial adsorption and catalytic processes (microand mesoporous adsorbents, with pore widths of under 2 nm and 2–50 nm, respectively, are widely used in the chemical, petrochemical, gas processing, and pharmaceutical industries for separations, pollution abatement, and as catalysts and catalyst supports). Additional application areas (e.g., in geology, oil recovery and nanofabrication, including nanotemplating through nanoconfinement) are described in the excellent review article by Gelb et al. Hence, understanding the phase behavior of nanoconfined fluids is key to the rational design and control of many processes and devices, both in the processing industries and in the emerging field of nanotechnology. Specifically, the change in melting temperature as a function of nanoconfinement is an important quantity to understand and predict. Gubbins and coworkers have been leaders in understanding these phenomena

[1]  H. Koerner,et al.  Force Field for Mica-Type Silicates and Dynamics of Octadecylammonium Chains Grafted to Montmorillonite , 2005 .

[2]  R. Maboudian,et al.  Tribological Challenges in Micromechanical Systems , 2013 .

[3]  Berend Smit,et al.  Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications , 1996 .

[4]  Patricia McGuiggan,et al.  Liquid to solidlike transitions of molecularly thin films under shear , 1990 .

[5]  P. Cummings,et al.  Hydration structure of water confined between mica surfaces. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  M. Śliwińska-Bartkowiak Freezing Behavior in Porous Materials : Theory and Experiment , 2001 .

[7]  Carson,et al.  Relaxation time of confined liquids under shear. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[8]  H. Christenson,et al.  Presence of Particles on Melt-Cut Mica Sheets , 1999 .

[9]  R. Tanner,et al.  Crystal bridge formation marks the transition to rigidity in a thin lubrication film. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[10]  S. Granick,et al.  Reassessment of Solidification in Fluids Confined between Mica Sheets , 2003 .

[11]  E. Kumacheva,et al.  Simple liquids confined to molecularly thin layers. II. Shear and frictional behavior of solidified films , 1998 .

[12]  E. Kumacheva,et al.  Simple liquids confined to molecularly thin layers. I. Confinement-induced liquid-to-solid phase transitions , 1998 .

[13]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[14]  Frank E. Talke,et al.  Effect of thermal pole tip protrusion and disk roughness on slider disk contacts , 2009 .

[15]  Berend Smit,et al.  Simulating the critical behaviour of complex fluids , 1993, Nature.

[16]  H. D. Cochran,et al.  Molecular simulation of the transition from liquidlike to solidlike behavior in complex fluids confined to nanoscale gaps , 2001 .

[17]  J. Gong,et al.  Influence of cyclohexane vapor on stick-slip friction between mica surfaces. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[18]  Jacob Klein,et al.  Lubrication at Physiological Pressures by Polyzwitterionic Brushes , 2009, Science.

[19]  E. Maginn From discovery to data: What must happen for molecular simulation to become a mainstream chemical engineering tool , 2009 .

[20]  M. Salmeron,et al.  Preparation of mica surfaces for enhanced resolution and cleanliness in the surface forces apparatus , 1998 .

[21]  R. Tanner,et al.  The structural origin of the complex rheology in thin dodecane films: Three routes to low friction , 2007 .

[22]  K. Gubbins,et al.  Global phase diagrams for freezing in porous media , 2002 .

[23]  Zhiqun Lin,et al.  Platinum Nanoparticles at Mica Surfaces , 2003 .

[24]  L. Bureau Rate effects on layering of a confined linear alkane. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[25]  Sharon C Glotzer,et al.  Icosahedral packing of polymer-tethered nanospheres and stabilization of the gyroid phase. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  E. Kumacheva,et al.  Forces between mica surfaces, prepared in different ways, across aqueous and nonaqueous liquids confined to molecularly thin films. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[27]  R. Tanner,et al.  Very low friction state of a dodecane film confined between mica surfaces. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[28]  K. Gubbins,et al.  Phase separation in confined systems , 1999 .

[29]  H. D. Cochran,et al.  Molecular dynamics study of the nano-rheology of n-dodecane confined between planar surfaces , 2003 .

[30]  P. Cummings,et al.  Fluidity of hydration layers nanoconfined between mica surfaces. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[31]  K. Gubbins,et al.  Freezing and melting of azeotropic mixtures confined in nanopores: experiment and molecular simulation , 2005 .

[32]  Uri Raviv,et al.  Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films , 2001, Nature.

[33]  H. D. Cochran,et al.  Effect of branches on the structure of narrowly confined alkane fluids: n-hexadecane and 2,6,11,15-tetramethylhexadecane , 2001 .

[34]  P. Cummings,et al.  Direct evidence for fluid–solid transition of nanoconfined fluids , 2010 .

[35]  H. Christenson Confinement effects on freezing and melting , 2001 .

[36]  E. Kumacheva,et al.  Confinement-Induced Phase Transitions in Simple Liquids , 1995, Science.

[37]  Jianping Gao,et al.  Layering Transitions and Dynamics of Confined Liquid Films , 1997 .

[38]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Comment on reassessment of solidification in fluids confined between mica sheets. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[39]  Ravi Radhakrishnan,et al.  Effect of the fluid-wall interaction on freezing of confined fluids: Toward the development of a global phase diagram , 2000 .

[40]  R. Tanner,et al.  Low friction lubrication between amorphous walls: unraveling the contributions of surface roughness and in-plane disorder. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.